User talk:Vidarlo/Archive1
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, Vidarlo/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist 16:34, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
No Problem
editThanks for returning my welcome, just one thing, you should put four tildes like this ~~~~ after your comments on talk pages, so people can respond to you easier. Karmafist 16:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
I found a source for the Roger Toll story so it's not your basic attack page. Please note, that you don't need to add extra categories when tagging them. Articles with deletion tags are automatically categorized. - Mgm|(talk) 13:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- You could always reword it in a more neutral way. - Mgm|(talk) 13:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/DrugChart
editWikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/DrugChart was submitted as a diagram including the links (as stated in the submission). Of course it is meaningless without them. --Thoric 03:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Looking at your recent vote on Single-phase transformer, I find your opposition to the drug chart a tad unfair in comparison. I would say that the Single-phase transformer diagram is less stunning, and less meaningful without the article. --Thoric 01:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
I know Thoric has spoken to you about this already, but I've been trying to decide whether to promote it or not for a few days now. You were opposed partially because the image was meaningless without the overlaid text. Have you seen Image:Drugchart.png? This image includes the text, so I was wondering what you thoughts are on this new image. Thanks. Raven4x4x 05:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks for replying. Raven4x4x 00:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Spoiler Warning
editHi, thanks for signing up. I have not been active with it lately, but the idea is still valid. We need to identify articles that have professional-level content worth publishing. If you happen to see any, please add them to the list! Theorectically with time the number of articles that are worthy of being published will increase. Finding them is a challenge. --Stbalbach 17:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Newcomer contribution
editHi. "Port 80" is a newcomer's first and only contribution and it's not self-serving vanity. In the future, please be kind and not use words like "unencyclopedic", "a lot of nonsense", "I don't think this page should exist on wikipedia." It would be nice if we appreciate the time the guy spent composing his contribution. Regards. -- Perfecto 15:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
FSF Screenshot Template
editFirst, forward the email you received to permissions at wikimedia dot org for recordkeeping. There are instructions for creating a template at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Creating new tags or sub-category. You could call the template {{FSF-screenshot}}. It should say something like "The FSF will permit the use of "screenshots without restrictions" of programs they own the copyright of. This does not include all programs licensed under the GPL or LGPL." I would ask on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags before creating the template. If no one objects, you can create it and list it on WP:ICT. It should be listed under Any purpose copyright, but probably not in GNU licenses. Superm401 | Talk 21:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Kosebamse
editThere's a word or two about me at User:Kosebamse/stuff. "Kosebamse" arose as a reminescence of an amorous involvement with a Norwegian; it's long past, but the nick stuck with me. And what's Vidarlo, by the way?
Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising
editThe Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 00:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter, Issue I
edit
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue I - March 2006 | |
|
Welcome to the inaugural issue of the Military history WikiProject's newsletter! We hope that this new format will help members—especially those who may be unable to keep up with some of the rapid developments that tend to occur—find new groups and programs within the project that they may wish to participate in. Please consider this inital issue to be a prototype; as always, any comments and suggestions are quite welcome, and will help us improve the newsletter in the coming months. Kirill Lokshin, Lead Coordinator |
|
delivered by Loopy e 05:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Reply to "Your UNIX-category image" on Commons
editIt took me a few minutes to figure out what image you meant, but I finally figured it out. ;) Now, about the GPL comment- here is why I do that. In Section 3, Part A of the GPL 2.0, it is stated:
Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code
I realise this requirement is met in itself, but some older text editors refuse to edit SVGs. Thus, I inlcude the source just in case. I will edit the page to no longer include the "must include" part. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 02:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Do you think that I should simply remove the code instead? I guess I could, as not many people you text editors like Notepad for Windows 2.0 anymore. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 10:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, i guess I will remove it. When I first tried to make SVGs in Inkscape, I thought of SVG as a type of graphic that could be scaled, and nothing more! ~Linuxerist E/L/T 10:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I am still getting used to Inkscape myself, as I have been using The GIMP for about 8 years, though just horrible drawing at first. I have mainly gained SVG knowledge merely by expirementing. I once had a weird idea to open up an SVG in pico, and sure enough saw it was an XML file. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 11:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oh sure. ;) I guess I should have noted I recently switched to emacs, so don't get me wrong there. I hadn't realised about xpm's before, though I guess it makes since. Also, a quick read through the Inkscape tutorials will allow you to do enough to make the basics. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 11:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I am still getting used to Inkscape myself, as I have been using The GIMP for about 8 years, though just horrible drawing at first. I have mainly gained SVG knowledge merely by expirementing. I once had a weird idea to open up an SVG in pico, and sure enough saw it was an XML file. ~Linuxerist E/L/T 11:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, i guess I will remove it. When I first tried to make SVGs in Inkscape, I thought of SVG as a type of graphic that could be scaled, and nothing more! ~Linuxerist E/L/T 10:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue II
editThe April 2006 issue of the project newsletter is now out. You may read this issue or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following the link. Thanks. Kirill Lokshin 19:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I have posted a reply on my talk page. — Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 00:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have posted a reply on my talk page. — Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 21:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
shortcut
editI removed the shortcut because none of the other portals have shortcuts listed at the top. When navigating from portal to portal, only the technology portal's content is shifted down because of the shortcut box at the top; shortcut boxes are more appropriate for project space than content pages like portals and articles.--ragesoss 19:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006
editThe May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
WikiLove!
editThank You! (You're Welcome too!)
editThank you for the barnstar, and you're welcome for the words and pizza! It feels great to be recognised with a barnstar. Anyways, happy editing. With WikiLove, ~Linuxerist E/L/T 18:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC) |
Vandalism?
editThank you for experimenting with the page Sarah McLachlan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Yamla 15:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- This was a simple mistake from my side. I checked an article I watch (pH) and found the image Image:Sarahvulva.jpg in that article. I checked other articles edited by the same IP, and looked for the image in them It was in the Sarah McLachlan aritcle. However, I must've waited until some other fellow had removed the image, and then pressed edit, and removed the first image line I saw. Sorry for not checking better, but it was not intentional harm. See this diff for more information. vidarlo 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006
editThe June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)