Vidovler
Sockpuppetry case
editYour name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aram-van for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
This investigation turned out negative; I apologize for any problems. We just thought temporarily that you might be the same person as another user who is banned on Wikipedia. You have no reason to worry from here on though. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
tks
Welcome!
edit
|
thank you.
WTF! Why am I blocked! I don't care to what he has reverted to, I have reverted to him! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 It was identical to the other editor, checking article history makes that clear!!! Also, this is not true: Vidovler came very soon after this sock person User:Mark Barsky was at last denied many times to be unblocked by admins. I have finals and am not contributing, just checking the recent edits. Its not because another editor was blocked that I should be careful and wait before making an edit!
Why can I only edit this page, how am I supposed to defend myself when I can't even contact the person who blocked me? What? Am I supposed to wait until someone visit my talkpage? Vidovler (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Is there anyone reading this?
Vidovler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Accept reason:
Although you have a similar point of view to the user of the other account involved, it does indeed seem that the charge of sockpuppetry is based purely on the fact that you undid a revert of that account's edit, which is minimal evidence. Also your account existed before the other one was even created. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
I am not the other editor, someone filed an accusation against me, and I was blocked 15 minutes later, without being able to defend myself. The accusation is not accurate. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 you can see that I only reverted on edit out of several edits which were reverted from both sides for days, because the others, both side had arguments for their version. Why should I be careful to edit, if someone else has reverted. It makes no sense for me to wait a day to revert. See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423727577&oldid=423685542 Does this mean they are the same user? It's true I did not edit that much, but I had my finals, so I keep myself updated by checking other editors contribution.
Also, why would I use another account, when mine is not blocked and that I could have reverted with it?
Nonetheless, I've blocked the account. These two edits are identical, so something is going on. — HelloAnnyong
- This is not true, my edit was identical to another user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nagorno-Karabakh_War&action=historysubmit&diff=423927061&oldid=423706401 the blocked user happened to revert to the same users version.
Thank you, thank you, thank you! :) But there seem to be a problem, I can't still edit. :(
- Sorry, I forgot to check for autoblocks. I have done it now: I hope you can edit at last. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you!
Talkback
editMessage added 19:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
An AE proceeding was launched against User:Dighapet [1]. This may concern you since you were involved in editing articles with his participation. Gorzaim (talk) 00:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)