Vishnuchakra
Welcome
editHello, Vishnuchakra, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Jisha (Talk) 19:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
India related Links
editEspionage in ancient India
editHello vishnu thanks for your interest in the article, unfortunately the article got deleted due to copyright problems and sadly i dont have a copy of it LegalEagle 04:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Your concerns
editVishnuji, I am not a very active editor on Wikipedia right now, and even when I do edit, I tend to stay mainly on anti-vandalism now. Anyways, I had put the tags up there a long time ago when there was indeed conflict about their neutrality. I have just reviewed Hindu Unity, and tried to make it NPOV up to my standards at least (I still have concerns that a whole entire section is used for the Israeli-Lebanon conflict; since the conflict is over the section should be condensed and put into the ideology section maybe??). Oh and by the way, there hasn't been too much activity about these articles recently so silence about neutrality does not mean no neutrality problems. Anyways, I would suggest starting a discussion on the talk page asking if any other editors object to removing the tag, but since I have not edited for a while now, you should check with WP guidelines first. But personally, I think:
- At least the HSS article is slanted to some degree
- I cannot judge the BJP article
- I already addressed my concerns on the HU article above.
But act according to Wikipedia guidelines and your own unbiased judgments if possible. Thank you! Mar de Sin Speak up! 19:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- As of right now, the tag is up there. I am also rather busy currently, and I will look into this matter later if possible. Try to talk to those who are involved in high school data etc., as they may be more seasoned on the topic. Thanks. Mar de Sin Speak up! 21:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
MS602: On Michael Crow's page, you wrote "The article doesn't explain WHY Crow was criticised." That's because some unknown user keeps deleting discussion which specifically criticizes. Whomever this is only leaves vague references on the page, and deletes all else. If you would like to read the articles that are referenced, and attempt an explanation, go ahead and try, but I'll bet this person will remove it fairly quickly.
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Clipmarks logo.gif)
editThanks for uploading Image:Clipmarks logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Clipmarks website.png)
editThanks for uploading Image:Clipmarks website.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I have converted your speedy-deletion tagging of this article into tagging for AFD consideration; it is not suitable for speedy deletion by a strict interpretation of policy. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top Tollywood films. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Request for help over sanskrit caption of R&AW
editHello, I would request you to kindly look into the devnagri seal caption of R&AW, which is given as धर्मो रक्षति रक्षित for Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha. I wish to know if it is correct in devnagri script. The english caption is correct, also can you tell the meaning of the motto in english LegalEagle 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)