Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Vroonmenon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baseline Ventures (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
John from Idegon (talk) 15:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Baseline Ventures India

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Baseline Ventures India, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Baseline Ventures has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baseline Ventures. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Feedback on your draft

edit

Hello, unfortunately I had to leave the IRC help chat due to real-world issues. You said the best three sources in your draft are 1, 3 and 9. Of those, #1, Bloomberg, is a mere business directory. It's not media coverage at all, and the amount of editorial oversight is questionable (Bloomberg also has genuine news reporting by journalists, but that's a different, unrelated part of Bloomberg). #3 doesn't say much about Baseline at all other than that it's new and Mumbai-based. #9 is slightly better in that it mentions some funding and the names of the founders, but neither provides all that much detail. We don't know any key facts that would allow us to tell how big and/or significant the company actually is. How many employees do they have, what are the revenues or profits? How do they compare to other companies in the sector? We don't know. You said on IRC that they have "made a significant impact on the sports industry" - neither source confirms that; I rather don't think we can conclude that brokering specific deals makes much of an impact. So if those were the best sources, it appears the company isn't quite notable (yet). Huon (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baseline Ventures (May 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 15:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flooded with them hundreds was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flooded with them hundreds 07:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Pro Volleyball League has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pro Volleyball League. Thanks! Whispering(t) 13:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro Volleyball League (January 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Volleyball Tournament Main

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Infobox Volleyball Tournament Main, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PVS Jan2018 01372.png

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:PVS Jan2018 01372.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply