User talk:Waddie96/Archive 3

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 27 June 2021
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Murphy's law

Excuse me, I'm reverting vandalism on Murphy's law. I'm not letting a bot beat me to it. --Facthead1 (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@Facthead1: you reverted what the bot did, please do not revert a bot as it's not constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Hildenbourgh section removal of infomation

Hi there. You removed my information on the Hildenborough section, I now realise that it is permanently closed, so I will add a section with something like this after Dame Kelly Holmes name. It will go like this, she had formally owned a cafe in Hildenborough called Cafe 1809

Im sorry for not including a source. You see I go through hildenbourgh every day and thought it would be useful to put on.

Kind regards, Jacob — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1612jacob (talkcontribs) 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Fugitive

What is your problem, turkey ? The paragraph I removed had NOTHING to do with the teevee story. The only way it even *resembles* the story is that the case was a husband-wife murder. No conviction of an innocent person, no escape, no running from the law, no relentless pursuit by a single-minded detective and most relevant of all, *no documented secondary sources indicating anyone else thought the Bailey case was relevant*, either.

I am now going to go back and remove that paragraph AGAIN because it is not relevant. I suggest you work on your reading comprehension before you do any more reverting. Maybe when you can pass a sixth-grade comprehension test you can come back and edit some more. Thank you. 203.160.71.20 (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your reasoning for deletion makes no sense. comrade waddie96 (talk) 11:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey Waddie96 - I am SO sorry about the various external links I've added to various Hastings pages. I'm just getting started on things and didn't realise this breaches the rules. Will spend some time reading up and it won't happen again. Thank you. Charlie HavokCharlie2101 (talk) 11:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of my addition

Hi Waddie I have not tried to edit a Wikipedia page for at least ten years and my addition was probably not the usual format but I think my addition is useful and informative in that section and more could be written about the song lyrics, which are very different from the original... a mixture of the Rastafarian take on the bible (Israelites and twelve tribes) and also the civil rights movement.

I have now tried to include a citation (to Wikipedia) and also the other link, which can take readers to the lyrics and audio of the song. Johnnyr92 (talk) 21:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi there Johnnyr92, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, when making additions to Wikipedia we need a reliable source to reference/cite the changes we make. Google search is not a reliable source. comrade waddie96 (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there Johnnyr92, other Wikipedia pages cannot be used as a WP:RS either. Please read the policy. comrade waddie96 (talk) 10:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

I opened a discussion on the article talk page, you are welcome to participate there but please remember that all content added to Wikipedia needs to be supported by a reliable source. If there is not a reliable source it will be removed.Spudlace (talk) 11:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi there Johnnyr92, your reverts are constituting violation of the WP:3RR. Please note that yes everything should be WP:RS, if a statement is not we do not remove it unless it is incorrect, but try find a source to support it. comrade waddie96 (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi waddie96 “if a statement is not we do not remove it unless it is incorrect, but try find a source to support it. comrade waddie96” You didn’t do this. You deleted everything. Why didn’t you just help with the citations instead? Johnny

Johnnyr92 (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

WIKIHOUNDING

Keep up your WP:WIKIHOUNDING and you'll find yourself reported.Jorge1777 (talk) 12:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Per the policy you've quoted, I am "fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy". comrade waddie96 (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Personally disagreeing with edits is not "unambiguous errors".Jorge1777 (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Per revert and discuss the edits can be reverted and a discussion started. comrade waddie96 (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Of course they can, you just cant stalk and should kindly fuck off.Jorge1777 (talk) 12:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Jorge1777 reported by Waddie96. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Important notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Lord Kelvin

Errm follow the link to his article? 93.136.139.21 (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Not notable in another article, unless you have a specific reason? comrade waddie96 (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Could've written that then as your reason instead of wasting my time. 93.136.139.21 (talk) 15:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Liberty Bell

Try reading the edit summary before drive by reverting edits 81.108.136.100 (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

81.108.136.100 there is a reference. comrade waddie96 (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

About movie plot resembling a novel plot

A Indian movie named Anniyan,about a lawyer suffering multiple personality disorder had the concept of a person suffering from the same mental disorder from an American Novel titled Tell me your dreams(1998),on checking the plot there are many similarities about both protagonists of the novel suffering from the same mental disorder and indulging in killing certain person who affected the person. Wiki778920 (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Wiki778920 please give more info what you need help with comrade waddie96 (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Check the plot section of both Anniyan and Tell me your dreams novel,the info is their. Wiki778920 (talk) 14:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Let the edit about anniyan plot being based on Tell me your dreams novel stay. Wiki778920 (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

About a Indian movie plot lifted from an American movie

This Indian movie named Gangleader,had its plot lifted from an American movie named Widows(2018). The concept of the plot of gangleader movie had five women whose dear ones suffering from cancer tried to make quick money by performing a robbery killed in a botched getaway similar to widows where one of the robber fakes death and takes the money. Wiki778920 (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please provide a reliable source when adding content. comrade waddie96 (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Check Plots of both Nani's Gangleader and widow(2018)movie,it is a reliable source Wiki778920 (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Seriosuyl?

Bro are you dumb or what? Yiube already been spoken to about stalking. Jorge1777 (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Please keep WP:CIVILITY Jorge1777. comrade waddie96 (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Keep this up and I'm going to report you. Jorge1777 (talk) 09:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do Jorge1777 comrade waddie96 (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
For a so-called communist you sure do seem content on enforcing CIA narratives. What sort of communist are you? Jorge1777 (talk) 09:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

 

Hi Waddie96, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  CaptainEekCreffettCwmhiraeth
  Anna FrodesiakBuckshot06RonhjonesSQL

  CheckUser changes

  SQL

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  • A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates

Read this in another languageSubscription list

 
The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Newton, Chambers & Co., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chapeltown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

  Fixed comrade waddie96 (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Editing news 2020 #3

 
On 16 March 2020, the 50 millionth edit was made using the visual editor on desktop.

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

  • The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
  • More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
  • Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
  • The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
  • Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
  • On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
  • In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Stanaford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raleigh County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

  Fixed comrade waddie96 (talk) 06:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feroza Adam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

  Fixed comrade waddie96 (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

James Johnston Shaw

See Talk:James_Johnston_Shaw#Contested_deletion - I believe that the material in question is out of copyright. Alekksandr (talk) 17:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Graham McNeill

Hi there, User:Waddie96. I did explain, on the change list. All of the information I removed already existed on the page in the bibliography, but the written version contained a lot of unnecessary details, and is all unsourced. To be honest, it reads a bit like the subject wrote it themselves. It includes information that no one but the author would know (and it isn't sourced): "[...] until he saw an advertisement for a writer in the December 1999 copy of White Dwarf." I think it’s a good change for the article, that it should stay, and then the article should be marked as a stub. Imaginestigers (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Red Phoenix
  EuryalusSQL
  JujutacularMonty845RettetastMadchester

  Oversight changes

  GB fan
  KeeganOpabinia regalisPremeditated Chaos

  Guideline and policy news


The Signpost: 2 August 2020

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nvidia Shield TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4K.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Editing news 2020 #4

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

 
The number of comments posted with the Reply Tool from March through June 2020. People used the Reply Tool to post over 7,400 comments with the tool.

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

  • More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
  • Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
  • Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[1]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

  • The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
  • Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Eddie891
  AngelaJcw69Just ChillingPhilg88Viajero

  CheckUser changes

  SQL

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AjpolinoLuK3
  Jackmcbarn
  Ad OrientemHarejLidLomnMentoz86Oliver PereiraXJaM
  There'sNoTimeTheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Thoughts on creating an article

Hello @Waddie96:, I noticed you are part of WP:Medicine and wanted to run a concept by you. I have a WP:COI with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and its faculties, so I typically ask for help from the WP:Medicine community. In my sandbox(linked below), I have a proposed article for a very notable physician-scientist. Dr. Kantoff is a physician-scientists at the organization. The heavy lifting of writing and sourcing the content with secondary sources is completed. Your help verifying the content and references would be super helpful.

What is your level of interest to collaborate on a project like this?--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Chefmikesf, I suggest submitting your article for review by using Articles for Creation since you have a COI and cannot create the article directly. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 1 November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AndrwscAnetodeGoldenRingJzGLinguistAtLargeNehrams2020

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Editing news 2021 #1

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

 
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in this report.

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

  • The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
  • It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

  • As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
  • There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[2]
  • The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[3] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
  •   A large A/B test will start soon.[4] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

New discussion tool

 
Screenshot of version 1.0 of the New Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[5] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

 

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  TJMSmith
  Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

  Interface administrator changes

  AmandaNP

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of INTERPOL.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of INTERPOL.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Destruction of Kashmiri Shias on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration


Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Malassezia on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Re: Ramadan

Hi,

I changed the illustration. I corrected the bug, now the infobox displays correctly without glitches.

PawełMM (talk) 17:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

May I ask what the benefit to making a montage a single photo instead of leaving it as a {{photomontage}}? Prior, readers could open an individual photo, now it's all one photo. waddie96 ★ (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnchanterCarlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration


Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ayurveda on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
  HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

  Arbitration


Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chimpanzee on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bank Zero South Africa logo 2019.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:Bank Zero South Africa logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

 
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021