Wanderer777
Main page: ru:User:Wanderer777
protection?
editHi Wanderer777. I was pinged at meta about problematic edits on your talk page. If you require protection on the page, please ping me with type and duration. For what it is worth, I have blocked the last IP address that edit for a day for disruptive editing. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @billinghurst Yes, I am an administrator in RuWiki, and on this page write indefinitely blocked. Can you hide everything except the very first version (2012 year) and last version ("protection?")? And protect against unregistered. --Wanderer777 (talk) 09:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Done Hi. Soft protection for 12 months. Plus I have deleted the content, I am hoping that leaving the edit summaries is okay to support the deletion summary. If there are problematic edit summaries, please identify which. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:15, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Wanderer777 (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization)
editHello, Wanderer777,
Thanks for creating Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization)! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thank you for your new article on the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, though I recommend finding more information from professional media articles (if there are any) about this group's shady operations.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs, what is the problem?
According to the link in the article - the organization is described in detail. So there is includin a characteristic from the real scientist with international authority. --Wanderer777 (talk) 17:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, You canceled my edits, despite the fact that i set a template "in use" on the article. This action is similar to vandalism. In addition, you are promoting a link that infringes copyright. This is very similar to spam. I ask you not to violate the rules of Wikipedia. If you have questions or objections about my contribution, you can always write to me on my Talk page.--DrPoglum (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --DrPoglum (talk) 11:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization) for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (Non-Governmental organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 18:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (non-governmental organization) for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (non-governmental organization) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.