WatermelonSugar05

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article .

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Andrew Tan (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Barkeep49 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin Andrew Tan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kevin Andrew Tan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Barkeep49 (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Amielalcala! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Barkeep49 (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 13:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WatermelonSugar05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am already aware what I am blocked for. This is regarding Kevin Tan's article. I understand the violation and promise not to do it again. Hoping for your kind consideration. WatermelonSugar05 (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WatermelonSugar05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi @Yamla: I apologize for not complying with Wiki guidelines and policies regarding Undisclosed Paid Editing (UPE). I understand the reason why I was blocked in editing Kevin Andrew Tan's article and I will not continue to cause damage like this and instead will make useful contributions in the future. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thank you. WatermelonSugar05 (talk) 04:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This doesn't address what was going on in that article. There was either sock or meat puppetry. One of you would write the article, then someone else would move the article out of draft space without waiting for an independent review. Why should we let people like this edit our website? You need to justify why we should unblock you when you've already showed contempt for our policies and processes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WatermelonSugar05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi @NinjaRobotPirate:. I sincerely apologize if I have executed sock or meat here on Wikipedia. I am just a newcomer and this is my first time creating and publishing an article and I wasn't aware back then what are the do's and don'ts. The person in the article wants it to be published asap. Hence, the article always moved out. I hope you understand. Thank you and have a nice day. WatermelonSugar05 (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Whether the person wants an article or not is completely irrelevant as it's not up to them. You haven't adequately addressed the reason for the block nor told what you will edit about that you have no conflict of interest with. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Kevin Andrew Tan

Hello, WatermelonSugar05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kevin Andrew Tan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)