Welcome

edit
Hello Wave26, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Wave26, good luck, and have fun.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Hello, Wave26, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Mystywave18 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 14:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. BethNaught (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wave26, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
The
Adventure
 

Hi Wave26!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Wave26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Suspected sock puppetry

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mystywave18. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (Philippines) has been accepted

edit
 
Kenneth Earl Medrano (Philippines), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 00:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wave26 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock this account. My article is already published and accepted here & it's very hard for me to make some edits on my article in Wikipedia if my account is blocked. I have in good faith and I'm responsible user that never violates any rules in Wikipedia. Since a new beginner, it's very hard for me to make an article with many errors on it but in the long run, I already manage of it. I have not related and no connection to the User:Mystywave18 since I didn't know it personally. There's such a little bit of confusion why my account was suspected by sock puppetry since I didn't know that other user uses my article with the same name. If there's any rule that I've violated like many edits or revisions on my article, I sincerely make an apologize with it. Please unblock my account since this is a legit account of mine and no one else. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thanks.
Wave26 (talk) 03:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You really need to explain why, then, User:Wave26 is identical to User:Mystywave18. --jpgordon::==( o ) 04:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wave26 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As the previous administrator said and declined my first request that to unblock my account that I need to explain why. I've already made an explanation of it. My reasons of it is since my article is already published and accepted here & it's very hard for me to make some edits on my article in Wikipedia if my account is blocked. I have in good faith and I'm a responsible user that never violates any rules in Wikipedia. Since a new beginner, it's very hard for me to make an article with many errors on it but in the long run, I already manage of it. I have not related and no connection to the User:Mystywave18 since I didn't know him or her personally and we have not related to each other. There's such a little bit of confusion why my account was suspected by sock puppetry since I didn't know that other user uses my article with the same name. If there's any rule that I've violated like many edits or revisions on my article, I sincerely make an apologize with it. Please unblock my account since this is a legit account of mine and no one else. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thanks.
Wave26 (talk) 08:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.