Wave26
Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
October 2015
editHello, Wave26, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Mystywave18 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 14:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. BethNaught (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Wave26, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
editHi Wave26!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 7)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Wave26,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 12)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (March 21)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Suspected sock puppetry
editYou are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mystywave18. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mystywave18 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (Philippines) has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
333-blue 00:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Wave26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please unblock this account. My article is already published and accepted here & it's very hard for me to make some edits on my article in Wikipedia if my account is blocked. I have in good faith and I'm responsible user that never violates any rules in Wikipedia. Since a new beginner, it's very hard for me to make an article with many errors on it but in the long run, I already manage of it. I have not related and no connection to the User:Mystywave18 since I didn't know it personally. There's such a little bit of confusion why my account was suspected by sock puppetry since I didn't know that other user uses my article with the same name. If there's any rule that I've violated like many edits or revisions on my article, I sincerely make an apologize with it. Please unblock my account since this is a legit account of mine and no one else. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thanks.
Wave26 (talk) 03:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You really need to explain why, then, User:Wave26 is identical to User:Mystywave18. --jpgordon::==( o ) 04:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wave26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As the previous administrator said and declined my first request that to unblock my account that I need to explain why. I've already made an explanation of it. My reasons of it is since my article is already published and accepted here & it's very hard for me to make some edits on my article in Wikipedia if my account is blocked. I have in good faith and I'm a responsible user that never violates any rules in Wikipedia. Since a new beginner, it's very hard for me to make an article with many errors on it but in the long run, I already manage of it. I have not related and no connection to the User:Mystywave18 since I didn't know him or her personally and we have not related to each other. There's such a little bit of confusion why my account was suspected by sock puppetry since I didn't know that other user uses my article with the same name. If there's any rule that I've violated like many edits or revisions on my article, I sincerely make an apologize with it. Please unblock my account since this is a legit account of mine and no one else. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thanks.
Wave26 (talk) 08:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
WP:DUCK sockpuppetry.OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.