Mystywave18

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Mystywave18, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 18:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Mystywave18! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 18:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Draft articles should not be categorised as per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. Please stop adding your draft to mainspace categories. Categories on draft articles can be deactivated by adding a : before the work Category, or by commenting them out totally. Thank you. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Mystywave18! I'm Kethrus. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. --  Kethrus |talk to me  11:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, In regards to your response, may I ask to you Kethrus if do so, give me some suggestions from you if what will be the correct & right sentence to the phrase " which is very common and popular by most good-looking & handsome men to do dubsmash"? How can I make construct of it??? Please make some more response what should be the right sentence? The explanation of it is, he is the most popular man who gain popularity in dubsmash in the Philippines especially the track "Twerk It Like Miley" among the other good-looking men. Tnx.
Mystywave18 (talk) 08:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I've copied this message over to my talk page so I can get a response to you quicker here. --  Kethrus |talk to me  08:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--  Kethrus |talk to me  08:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--  Kethrus |talk to me  09:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Do not add copyrighted images to Wikipedia or to Wikimedia Commons. You will be blocked if you continue. BethNaught (talk) 07:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner, August 2015.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner, August 2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/KennethEarlMedranoofficial/photos/pb.492761354211398.-2207520000.1444229813./540079256146274/?type=3&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kenneth Earl Medrano in Buena Familia, Sept. 2015.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kenneth Earl Medrano in Buena Familia, Sept. 2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 13:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Seven Grand Finalists of That's My Bae on Eat Bulaga!, Aug. 2015.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Seven Grand Finalists of That's My Bae on Eat Bulaga!, Aug. 2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner on Eat Bulaga 2015.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner on Eat Bulaga 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 17:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 17:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 07:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 08:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Note you may be unblocked if you explain how your uploads have violated Wikipedia's copyright policy and how you will change your behavior. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 08:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenneth Earl Medrano (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner during mall show, 2015.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mystywave18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I deeply say a sorry and apologize with it to all administrators in Wikipedia cause I violated the rules. It's very hard for me at first as a first timer user to make an article with many errors on it. Many times of submitting my old article with much references and its resources but in return is still an error. And because of this, I created a new account under the name -- Wave26. It's been a while I didn't use this account on which is already blocked that's is why I decided to close this account cause it's been I no longer used of it and I didn't know the procedure of how to appeal on it before. But I don't know how to close this old account. If do so, I'm appealing and begging on it's administrators to please unblock my new account which is User:Wave26 cause the draft I made on this user was already approved and moved into an article. And as the owner of the article I made, it's very hard for me to make new articles and make some additional edits to my article its because of being blocked. Please give me a second chance by refraining from making any edits, using any account or anonymously. Again, please unblock User:Wave26 cause this user is already my new account and please close this old user account in order not to confuse it's administrators. And I will promise not to do it again. Hoping for your warm kind consideration. Thanks.
Mystywave18 (talk) 07:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violations of our copyright policy, and this is the issue you must address if you wish to be unblocked. Please explain your understanding of copyright policy and law as it affects Wikipedia articles.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mystywave18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all, I want to say sorry and make an apologize to all administrators in Wikipedia cause I violated the rules. And I admitted all of my mistakes which is the copyright violation from this main account and the second one is sockpuppeting through my new account. It's very hard for me at first as a first timer user to make an article with many errors on it. Many times of submitting my old draft/article in spite of much references and its resources but in return my draft/article is still declined after being reviewed by it's reviewers. And because of that time I feel a little bit of disappointment on that time, due to many errors on which I didn't know that I already crossed the line and violated through it's copyright which leads on this main account of mine was being blocked, I decided to create a new account under the name -- Wave26 in order to continue my unfinished work draft/article in order to be published as an article. It's been a while I didn't use this account for almost 5 months already on which is already blocked that's why I decided to stop using this account it's because of being blocked. It's been no longer & I never used this already and I didn't know the procedures of how to appeal on it before. But now, after I already read all the copyright policies and rules, the sockpuppeting offenses and also on how to appeal blocks. I admitted all of my mistakes and errors I made on it and I will take all the consequences on it. From violating copyright procedures and also sockpuppeting through my new user account. By this time, I'm appealing and begging on it's administrators to please give me a second chance. Please unblock my new account which is User:Wave26 it's because the draft I made on this user was already approved and moved into an article. And as the rightful owner of the article Kenneth Medrano that I made from this main account before, it's very hard for me to make new articles and make some additional contributions of edits to my article which is Kenneth Medrano its because of being blocked. Please give me a second chance by refraining from making any edits, using any account or anonymously. Again, please unblock User:Wave26 it's because this user is already my new account and please close this old user account User:Mystywave18 in order not to confuse its administrators. And I will promise never to do it again. Hoping for your warm kind and consideration. Thanks.
Mystywave18 (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You aren't asking for this account to be unblocked. Even if you were, I'd be concerned that you haven't expressed a clear understanding of copyright, and you seem to think you own the article, Kenneth Medrano, which you don't. See WP:OWN. Yamla (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also have clearly have at least one more undisclosed sockpuppet account, Kemhaetroian (talk · contribs), which will now be blocked for ban evasion. --Yamla (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

To Yamla: I didn't know what are you saying. You accusing me again of sockpuppetry of this another account and so on and so forth that I didn't know who are these users? Why is it that you are forcing me to tell the truth, the truth that these users are also my sockpuppets? Even though I didn't? Even I didn't know these accounts you mention and I'm an innocent of this accusation. I'm already admitted all of my mistakes and I'm already said to my appeal that there's only one sockpuppet account I made which is User:Wave26 and NO ONE ELSE or any new account I created after. So please, please, STOP accusing me of anything about these users it's because even me I didn't know these users at all and I'm already tell the TRUTH and I'm NOT hiding anything. It makes me so disappointed of all of your accusations. Too much judgmental
Mystywave18 (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mystywave18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all, I want to say sorry and make an apologize to all administrators in Wikipedia cause I violated the rules. And I admitted all of my mistakes which is the copyright violation from this main account and the second one is sockpuppeting through my new account. It's very hard for me at first as a first timer user to make an article with many errors on it. Many times of submitting my old draft/article in spite of much references and its resources but in return my draft/article is still declined after being reviewed by it's reviewers. And because I feel a little bit of disappointment on that time, due to many errors on it, I didn't know that I already crossed the line and violated through it's copyright rules which leads on this main account of mine was being blocked, I didn't know the rules at first that a picture that comes or sources from the web to use as an image on my draft is a COPYRIGHT VIOLATION. That's why, after my account was blocked, I decided to create a new account under the name -- Wave26 in order to continue my unfinished work draft/article in order to be published as an article. It's been a while I didn't use this account for almost 5 months already on which is already blocked that's why I decided to stop using this account it's because of being blocked. It's been no longer & I never used this already and I didn't know the procedures of how to appeal on it before. But now, after I already read all the copyright policies and rules, the sockpuppeting offenses and also on how to appeal blocks. I admitted and realized all of my mistakes and errors I made on it and I will take all the consequences on it. From violating copyright procedures and also sockpuppeting through my new user account. By this time, I'm appealing and begging to all on it's administrators to please give me a second chance. I'm asking and begging for you all to please unblocked my account, and I take all of my responsibilities as a biggest mistake I made. It's very hard for me to make new articles and make some additional contributions of edits to my article which is Kenneth Medrano its because of being blocked. And I admitted that I am the author of this article. Please give me a second chance by refraining from making any edits, using any account or anonymously. And also I may request to it's administrators to cancel or erase to your system my sockpuppet account which is Wave26. I'm be using this account again if my request of apology and sorry is granted, please unblock my account and I will promise never to do it again. Hoping for your warm kind and consideration. Thanks.
Mystywave18 (talk) 11:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If there was any remaining trace of a chance that an administrator might accept your unblock request, removing Yamla's message to the reviewing administrator again, after you had been warned about doing so, would have removed that trace. If you didn't realise that, then you lack the ability to understand that is needed to edit constructively. And if you really wanted to make 200% sure that no administrator would consider unblock you, removing that message and giving the edit summary "FUCKING BULLSHIT WIKIPEDISA" was a pretty good way to do so. (All that is quite apart from the fact that you still haven't answered the questions about copyright.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin, note that this user has not made a statement about the abusive sockpuppet account previously mentioned, Kemhaetroian (talk · contribs), nor did they mention the new sockpuppet account, Baeken (talk · contribs), an account editing as late as yesterday. I strongly suggest not unblocking this user until they have shown they are willing to abide by Wikipedia's policies. --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Mystywave18, if you remove my comment to the reviewing admin again, you will lose your access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

You were warned. You have now lost access to your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

• Another point is that your claim not to have used sockpuppets other than Wave26 is even less likely to be believed than would have been the case had you not repeatedly lied by claiming that Wave26 was not you. Have you ever heard of crying wolf? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)