User talk:WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives/2021

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbados national under-20 football team has been accepted

Barbados national under-20 football team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Em-em ^talk 21:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Lucia national under-20 football team (February 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Previous Block Evasion Appeals

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As you know, I have contributed to Wikipedia in lots of good ways. So, why out of the blue? I don't who TechnoBladeSPX is, and if you are talking about me ALONE... you can check my user page as to why I had to create this second account. Also, I have over 535+ edits, and I have done my best to stop vandalism such as, on Kevin de Bruyne, WhiteHat Jr. and Adam Sanford. I have done everything the right way. I started out all my articles as drafts, and all the articles I published were when they were reviewed, such as Zxcvbnm, Rich and Sagotreespirit. Please unblock me. I have not done anything wrong. I do not understand anything right now. I have many drafts waiting to be published, and-I believe I make a point-Wikipedia has a long way to be a fully, finished encyclopedia. Check my statistics for all I care. I just want to help Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a fully-grown community, and if I may-still needs to improve. That is all from me now. I hope you will, PLEASE unblock me.

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sock puppet. Appeal the block on your original account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As you know, I have contributed to Wikipedia in lots of good ways. So, why out of the blue? I don't who TechnoBladeSPX is, and if you are talking about me ALONE... you can check my user page as to why I had to create this second account. Also, I have over 535+ edits, and I have done my best to stop vandalism such as, on Kevin de Bruyne, WhiteHat Jr. and Adam Sanford. I have done everything the right way. I started out all my articles as drafts, and all the articles I published were when they were reviewed, such as Zxcvbnm, Rich and Sagotreespirit. Please unblock me. I have not done anything wrong. I do not understand anything right now. I have many drafts waiting to be published, and-I believe I make a point-Wikipedia has a long way to be a fully, finished encyclopedia. Check my statistics for all I care. I just want to help Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a fully-grown community, and if I may-still needs to improve. That is all from me now. I hope you will, PLEASE unblock me. Also, I can't appeal on my other account, since I trashed me other computer and I do not remember my password for my original account.

Decline reason:

Based on edit patterns and checkuser's evidence, this appears to be a clear case of sockpuppetry. only (talk) 02:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. As I have looked back on my past mistakes, I have realised my many mistakes on Sockpuppetry. This is why I pledge (vow) to never repeat this mistake on abusively using multiple accounts. Apart from my other accounts, this account has been different, and I believe you can say the same. I will try to NEVER do this again. And, if I do, well any admin can block me without question, and I won't appeal. I will also try never to create a different account which in any way is a case of Sockpuppetry. I am incredibly sorry everyone for abusively using multiple accounts. Sorry. Please unblock me. I will never, EVER repeat this measly mistake. WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given your very recent history of sockpuppetry, please wait at least six months before appealing, and use this time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. After at least six months without sockpuppetry or block evasion, an unblock request may be accepted under the standard offer at an administrator's discretion. If you still have access to the TechnoBladeSPX account, please submit future unblock requests at User talk:TechnoBladeSPX. — Newslinger talk 05:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block Evasion Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WellThisIsTheReaper/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. As I have looked back on my past mistakes, I have realised my many mistakes on WP:Sockpuppetry. This is why I pledge (vow) to never repeat this mistake on abusively using multiple accounts. Apart from my other accounts, the account, WellThisIsTheReaper has been different, and I believe you can say the same. I will try to NEVER do this again. And, if I do, well any admin can block me without question, and I won't appeal. I will also try never to create a different account which in any way is a case of Sockpuppetry. I am incredibly sorry everyone for abusively using multiple accounts. Sorry. Please unblock me. I will never, EVER repeat this measly mistake. I would also like to point out that I have done 6 months (October 20th, 2020 - April 20th, 2021) without sockpuppetry and/or posting a single block evasion proccess message. Thank you for listening to me. I hope you unblock me. Thanks. (Note: I have also posted a block appeal on TechnoBladeSPX) WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 00:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This is a duplicate request, there's an open request on your original account and the matter will be dealt with there. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

As discussed at User_talk:TechnoBladeSPX, I have unblocked this account and reblocked that one (to reduce the possibility of inappropriate use of multiple accounts). GeneralNotability (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@GeneralNotability: Thank you, and I hope you have a good day. Cheers, WellThisIsTheReaper (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let's Go! Valtryek! (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Yeeno were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let's Go! Valtryek! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Let's Go! Valtryek!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 20:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let's Go! Valtryek! (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yeeno was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let's Go! Valtryek! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Let's Go! Valtryek!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 22:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valt Aoi (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valt Aoi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Valt Aoi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Flash (season 1) into Draft:Going Rogue (The Flash). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Going Rogue (The Flash) (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Going Rogue (The Flash) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Going Rogue (The Flash), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous (season 1) (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous (season 1) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous (season 1), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OceanHok (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daughter of the Deep (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daughter of the Deep and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daughter of the Deep, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 21:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Your edit to Draft:Daughter of the Deep has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Spicy (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Big Shot has been accepted

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Big Shot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jlvsclrk (talk) 19:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Going Rogue (The Flash) has been accepted

Going Rogue (The Flash), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minor League Cricket (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Minor League Cricket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Minor League Cricket, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 23:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Minor League Cricket has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minor League Cricket. Thanks! Tame (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minor League Cricket has been accepted

Minor League Cricket, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Saint Lucia national under-20 football team

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saint Lucia national under-20 football team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Your edit to Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Big Shot has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Asia Cup

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Asia Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 00:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Asia Cup

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Asia Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Gargi Bhogle

Hi. Please note that the article for Gargi Bhogle does not meet the notability requirements for a cricketer. If the USA reach the 2022 ICC Women's World Twenty20 Qualifier, AND she plays in the tournament, she would then meet the requirements. Playing in the sub-regional qualifiers doesn't make the person notable in itself. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Valt Aoi

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valt Aoi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Beyblade Burst (anime)

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beyblade Burst (anime), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous (season 1)

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous (season 1), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Houston Hurricanes (cricket team)

A tag has been placed on Houston Hurricanes (cricket team) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beyblade Burst (anime)

Hello, WellThisIsTheReaper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beyblade Burst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)