User talk:Werldwayd/Archive33
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Werldwayd. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article The Call (2002 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mongolian-National-Democratic-Party-2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mongolian-National-Democratic-Party-2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majash2020 (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nexus-music.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Nexus-music.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anomie (Stephen Simmonds album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Majash2020 (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of A'typisk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A'typisk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A'typisk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Your draft article, Draft:Alexandre Tarta
Hello, Werldwayd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexandre Tarta".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Jeanene Fox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable BLP
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Anomie-album-by-stephen-simmonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of International College of Excellence
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on International College of Excellence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- On second thought, rather than speedily deleting the page, I've converted it back to being a redirect, to Robb Thompson#International College of Excellence. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Khalil-and-majnun.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Khalil-and-majnun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arev-arabic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Arev-arabic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Requesting article expansion help
Hi,
Recently initiated Draft:Yasmine Mohammed as stub article. Pl. do have a look at the article and if interests you then join in expanding the same with suitable references.
Thanks and regards.
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beste Zangers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jan Keizer and Ben Saunders.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leto (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niska.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Node (singer)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Node (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://krposts.com/block/ycqf5J44SWgTvMeO1lQ-2w. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 14:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Orphaned non-free image File:The Washington Post front page.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Washington Post front page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Mookie's Law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable short film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability for over a year.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mookies-law-short.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mookies-law-short.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Jubël - Dancing in the Moonlight
Hello Werldwayd
I wanted to thank you for your contributions to the Jubël version of Dancing in the moonlight. I thought I would let you know that I have added some more charts and a certifications table (although it has displayed using the American MDY date format whereas the chart table uses the DMY date format, I’m not sure why this is?)
Thanks again, TF0771 (talk) 12:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- The reason for using DMY in the Jubël section was because Jubël is a Swedish act and in Sweden they use DMY. But since the great majority of the page is in MDY, go ahead, you have my go ahead to convert all of the ones appearing as DMY to MDY for consistency in the whole article. werldwayd (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response, I will do this now. TF0771 (talk) 20:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey Werldwayd. Would you be willing to expand Jubël (duo) into an article? I was just notified that this and Jubël (band) have been nominated for deletion, and I think it's pointless as the band have had more entries in Europe than just their cover of "Dancing in the Moonlight". Thanks. Ss112 15:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. I am happy you contacted me after all this time. I appreciated you great contributions and chart updates. And I appreciate your edits from time to time. But no rush. A person like you could have a chart website on your own. You were visiting all these chart pages and you probably know a lot about international music. I will definitly try to come up with an article for Jubël as well in a couple of days I hope. I do really believe Wikipedia is not doing enough to highlight international music. Yes we have a lot, but we miss a lot as well. werldwayd (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the well wishes you left on my talk page a few months back and here now. I've semi-returned to editing, but also remain semi-retired. I haven't gotten back into doing chart updates, and I don't particularly wish to or see myself doing so. There are other users covering most of that now, and I'm fine with that freeing up most of the time I used to dedicate to doing them, although I do agree with your point that Wikipedia's coverage is lacking on international non-English music. Anyway, thanks if you can get around to expanding the article. Ss112 16:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks User talk:Ss112. After your great words, I am even more motivated to at least launch a page for Jubël. I am also having this "Wikipedia fatigue" by now and don't edit that much. I am happy you keep at least a token link with Wikipedia. Plus that your tremendous input for years to Wikipedia Music was legendary and much appreciated. I can't forget that. I used to keep up just the music number ones pages and it was so much work. But you were updating all the new entries and the new peaks of all the songs and with much better referencing than I could ever do. That was awesome. So I quit even doing the number ones. In any case, there are times we have to set our priorities and if necessary call quits here. The whole Wikipedia system is built on voluntary efforts of people who have this idealistic vision that they are contributing meaningfully to a greater project and that they are appreciated by many. Then some stupid discussion and so much insult makes us realise that our sacrifices were not considered at all by other trigger-happy colleagues and administrators. I am surprised how people like me just continue to donate our times this way. Me I almost never take part in discussions because of their toxic atmosphere. I make one token effort to save an article and if I get a tit for tat or firey answer, I just quit. They can delete it for all I care. And move on to some other article myself. No one article or position is worth the risk. I just mind my business and almost totally ignore discussing after a token intervention. Still thanks to you. By the way, I love Jubël. I find them fascinating. werldwayd (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Now I have created a complete article to avoid all this discussion about redirects etc. It was such a pleasure to contribute this as I am fascinated by the talent of this duo and gave me the opportunity to listen to 8-9 songs of theirs. I have also left a message on the redirect talk page about closing the discussion after all these improvements. werldwayd (talk) 23:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks User talk:Ss112. After your great words, I am even more motivated to at least launch a page for Jubël. I am also having this "Wikipedia fatigue" by now and don't edit that much. I am happy you keep at least a token link with Wikipedia. Plus that your tremendous input for years to Wikipedia Music was legendary and much appreciated. I can't forget that. I used to keep up just the music number ones pages and it was so much work. But you were updating all the new entries and the new peaks of all the songs and with much better referencing than I could ever do. That was awesome. So I quit even doing the number ones. In any case, there are times we have to set our priorities and if necessary call quits here. The whole Wikipedia system is built on voluntary efforts of people who have this idealistic vision that they are contributing meaningfully to a greater project and that they are appreciated by many. Then some stupid discussion and so much insult makes us realise that our sacrifices were not considered at all by other trigger-happy colleagues and administrators. I am surprised how people like me just continue to donate our times this way. Me I almost never take part in discussions because of their toxic atmosphere. I make one token effort to save an article and if I get a tit for tat or firey answer, I just quit. They can delete it for all I care. And move on to some other article myself. No one article or position is worth the risk. I just mind my business and almost totally ignore discussing after a token intervention. Still thanks to you. By the way, I love Jubël. I find them fascinating. werldwayd (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the well wishes you left on my talk page a few months back and here now. I've semi-returned to editing, but also remain semi-retired. I haven't gotten back into doing chart updates, and I don't particularly wish to or see myself doing so. There are other users covering most of that now, and I'm fine with that freeing up most of the time I used to dedicate to doing them, although I do agree with your point that Wikipedia's coverage is lacking on international non-English music. Anyway, thanks if you can get around to expanding the article. Ss112 16:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banana (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaggy.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Can you make an article for the new Kane Brown EP?
The new Kane Brown EP has two pretty huge hits, with "Cool Again" and "Be Like That". I was wondering if you could make an article for it. 2001:558:6012:50:7902:D51F:B9F7:9985 (talk) 02:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Now I have created the page for the EP. Please refer to: Mixtape, Vol. 1 (Kane Brown EP). You may also make further improvement if you want and thanks for the suggestion. I really like Kane Brown's songs and it was a pleasure. 08:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shot in the Dark (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shot in the Dark.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
"Liraz" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liraz. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 9#Liraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Balavoine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starmania.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Süßer die Glocken nie klingen
You created the redirect for Süßer die Glocken nie klingen to "the writer", but it's the wrong person. Did you read that article? Just wondering ... - No need to change, and the correct one has no article, - I'll substitute by an article about the song tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda Arendt. Well I was depending on the List of carols under German. Now as a rectifying move, I have redirected like this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christmas_carols#German which is our page List of Christmas#German which is the best move for now. It explains as "The Bells Never Sound Sweeter" / Traditional / Wilhelm Kritzinger .... So you see my obvious confusion with Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger. In this latter article it says his father was a Christian pastor. Is it actually his father we are talking about? In any case, now the forward is to the Christmas carols page, so accurate. Hopefully some fellow editor will use this as an incentive to create a full article for this popular Christmas song werldwayd (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Looking forward for a full article on this from you. Don't forget also the language versions and covers by well known artists recording it. WE thankfully have a German article about it already in Wikipedia in addition to Spanish, Italian and Polish. So an English article will fill a great need for coverage of a wonderful song. werldwayd (talk) 00:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NewYorkTimesFrontPage-15Nov2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I think the disambig page should be merged with Atletico into one page, with the various Athletico SC's and Atlético's redirecting to the same page. Nehme1499 (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for suggesting. But Atletico had just two items whereas I had collected more than10-12 items and I thought the English Athletico would be better for English Wikipedia. But now that most of the items I have added are Atlético, I have taken your suggestion and moved them there. werldwayd (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Perfect, thanks! Nehme1499 (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- God bless. والله كنت نور ونعمة عليّي werldwayd (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Perfect, thanks! Nehme1499 (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Beach basketball for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beach basketball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach basketball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deadbeef
04:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atlético, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nacional Atlético Clube.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Atlético F.C.
Hello. I've attempted to fix the links to dabs resulting from the Atlético F.C. move, but it's a complex web of redirects and renamings and I may have made mistakes. Please can you check my work? Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- I appreciate so much your work Certes and thank God for DisamAssist without which this would have been an impossible task. It was wrong from the outset to establish Atletico FC for one specific club, even if it was called Atlético Fútbol Club as you realize Atletico FC applies to hundreds of teams. So I don't know why that one team was chosen for this. It had to be changed to Atlético FC Cali or whatever. Plus there were so many links as Dépor F.C.. Also Atlético Juventud is also a common generic name of many clubs, so I had to change that specific one to Atlético Juventud Girardot. There are many Atlético Juventuds. Atletico SC was also a very common name, so why assign it to some obscure Lebanese women's team in a small town. All these generic names needed to be corrected. I am so sad this caused so many wrong links in Wikipedia that needed fixing, but now you have done an admirable job for which I am forever thankful. I am checking the corrections one by one and they look fine. werldwayd (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- You're right that there are other clubs called Atlético Juventud, such as Juventud de Las Piedras, Juventud Unida Universitario and Juventud de Pergamino. I retargeted that redirect to Atlético Juventud Girardot, but perhaps it should be a {{R from ambiguous term}} or even a new dab and its incoming links changed. My other concern was that some links to Athletico SC (Lebanon) clearly refer to men's football. I'm going to assume that the "homonymous sports academy" also had a male team not mentioned in the article; it's no worse than linking Atlético Cali from 2019 Colombian Women's Football League. Certes (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Just wanted to clarify. Athletico SC (Lebanon) is a football academy, for men and women. The men's sector only has youth clubs, and compete in U17, U19, etc. leagues. The women's sector has youth clubs, as well as a senior club that played in the top division. The article in and of itself is about the women's senior club, because it is notable (for having played in the Lebanese Women's Football League). The academy itself—and its youth clubs—isn't notable. Hope that makes sense. Nehme1499 (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- You're right that there are other clubs called Atlético Juventud, such as Juventud de Las Piedras, Juventud Unida Universitario and Juventud de Pergamino. I retargeted that redirect to Atlético Juventud Girardot, but perhaps it should be a {{R from ambiguous term}} or even a new dab and its incoming links changed. My other concern was that some links to Athletico SC (Lebanon) clearly refer to men's football. I'm going to assume that the "homonymous sports academy" also had a male team not mentioned in the article; it's no worse than linking Atlético Cali from 2019 Colombian Women's Football League. Certes (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoongAng-Ilbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RIPRO-4-by-Lacrim.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RIPRO-4-by-Lacrim.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RIPRO-4-by-Lacrim.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RIPRO-4-by-Lacrim.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
"Romeo Lacoste" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Romeo Lacoste. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 29#Romeo Lacoste until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Greyjoy talk 05:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Tove Lo
Thanks for thanking me for starting the page. But mine was a modest start, a very very modest for the page when she had just one or two hits. I heard them and I liked them. So I rushed creating the page. I was terrified though some colleague would come swiftly and suggest deleting it for lack of notability, lack of references etc. But it stayed strangely enough and now look at the page! Yes I was so excited for an unknown Swedish singer, but never expected it would blossom into this. So impressive. I am though still with the small guy as always. I always have that fear they will delete a page I really cared for... So despite all my edits, I still fear such a treatment. But when a page gets real big, you won't see me edit in a page like Tove Lo anymore. She is so big now, my effort is better used somewhere else. At the time I was the one. The only one practically. Now there are hundreds of volunteers... but not me. Still thanks anyway. You made my day and made me reminisce the days when my service was needed. This is my two cents for fellow editors. That they err to the side of inclusiveness. Someone somewhere needs our input. Perhaps the artist himself or herself in his/her greatest time of need for being acknowledged. When they get real big eventually, who needs an editor like me anyway. werldwayd (talk) 00:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Your reply made me smile during the entire time I was reading your comment @Werldwayd:, Lo's music means a lot to me and I certainly dose to you too! I related completely when you talked about getting a page deleted. I had the same fear after my first page, that someone would suggest it getting deleted because of some strange reason, but no, it stayed! My very first article/draft/sandbox wasn't so lucky though... when I received the "welcome to the TeaHouse" notification, my day would be completely ruined. You were the one to start Lo's page and you built the foundation for that article, now people are building the rest, and look at it now! It's now a Wikipedia:Good article! Thank you for creating the article when you did, and for your work on this wonderful piece of art! Thank you so much! Much love,--Los Perros pueden Cocinar (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC) <3
Thanks again. When you have a problem with editing or a page you proposed is being nominated for deletion, I would love to help if possible. Drop a line on my talk page. You have to restore at least a minimum user page as well now deleted. Nothing elaborate mind you. Just what areas you love editing, what are your priorities editing and how they can contact you. It shouln't be a red link. Just 3-4 lines will do. Meanwhile all the best. It was a pleasure. werldwayd (talk) 07:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
UFO Yepha
Hi, they didn't have an & in their name. While you're at it, you can link Yepha which you made later on. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your note. I have fixed the name and linked to Yepha as well. Thanks again werldwayd (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Reverted move
Hi, just to let you know I've reverted your move of Illustrated Daily News, given it was never formally named the Los Angeles Daily News. It might be worth a talk page discussion if you intend to move FAs in future, since they are generally watched and their names have been the source of discussion, as indeed this was at the FAC. All the best.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Esporte Clube Juventude
- added a link pointing to Juventud
- Juventude Sport Clube
- added a link pointing to Juventud
- Los Angeles Herald
- added a link pointing to Los Angeles Express
- Los Angeles Herald-Express
- added a link pointing to Los Angeles Express
- TeenStar
- added a link pointing to Hayes
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The-Times-5-June-2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The-Times-5-June-2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Baselios-Paulose-II.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Baselios-Paulose-II.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://www.syriacchristianity.info/MorBaseliosPauloseII/Photos.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elizium23 (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- This may be considered a fair use since it pertains to a deceased person and is a very standard historical photo. For notable dead persons, it may be impossible to provide non copyright photos. So we may use a widely used photo already in circulation on many other sites and print publications. Such photos are considered typical photos for general use. werldwayd (talk) 09:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)