Wgrommel

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wgrommel. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Trial of Socrates

Hi, I saw your page move. I think you were trying to get rid of the italics since that's what you said in the edit summary, but you ended up moving the article to the Trial of Socratesxx instead. Don't worry about it, I fixed it. In regards to the italicized title, a lot of the time articles like that will have {{Italic title}} near the top. I'm actually surprised that this didn't have that, but I'm guessing there's something that even I'm not aware of that's causing that. But it isn't just works of art that have italicized titles... legal cases do, too: Snow v Eaton Centre Ltd is another example of this. But again, don't worry too much about any of this. In general it's great to be bold in your editing. If you ever have any questions, feel free to ask me though. Or at the Teahouse, which is a friendly forum for new editors. Clovermoss (talk) 23:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, in my world (databases) renaming an object and then renaming it again isn't a big deal ... oops. Not sure I would call 'Trial of Socrates' a legal case (In re Socrates? City of Athens vs. Socrates??), but what do I know? Thanks for fixing this! Wgrommel (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Wgrommel Honestly I'm inclined to agree with you, I was just trying to explain the most likely reason for why it was the way it was. As for databases... have you heard of wikidata? If you're passionate about those that sister project might be of interest to you. Clovermoss (talk) 06:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trial of Socratesxx

A tag has been placed on Trial of Socratesxx requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PatGallacher (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)