WhiteCas

January 2020

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Yang Zi (actress)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mehazabien Chowdhury. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Your article দিল্ রাবা দিল্মুরাত

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page দিল্ রাবা দিল্মুরাত to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Csgir (talk) 07:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, দিল্ রাবা দিল্মুরাত

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, দিল্ রাবা দিল্মুরাত. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Dilraba Dilmurat. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dilraba Dilmurat. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cahk (talk) 11:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Saga of Light for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saga of Light is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saga of Light until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Eternal Love of Dream, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi WhiteCas, the discussion at Talk:Eternal Love of Dream § Requested move 18 February 2020 concluded that Eternal Love of Dream is the best title for the article, since this is the only article on Wikipedia that covers something called "Eternal Love of Dream". We generally only use parenthetical disambiguation, such as "(TV series)", when the title could refer to more than one subject. — Newslinger talk 07:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eternal Love of Dream Poster 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eternal Love of Dream Poster 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Eternal Love of Dream

I am an administrator dealing with requests at WP:RFPP. One request is that Eternal Love of Dream be move protected to prevent further changes to the title agreed at Talk:Eternal Love of Dream#Requested move 18 February 2020. I am going to decline the move-protection request but please know that you will be blocked if you move the article again (after moving it on 17 February 2020 and 1 March 2020) without first establishing a new consensus per WP:RM. Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, WhiteCas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?

If you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WhiteCas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WhiteCas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply: Don't harass me further

Hi, this is WhiteCas. Why are you harass me? I don't no what kind of promotional edit i have done. But I have to clear you that I am not a employer, client and affiliation. Don't get me wrong. You are totally sick mentality. I edited page with verified link. I contributed underrated Wikipedia page. What is your problem man? It will very embarrassing things If you massage me and notice me further.

I clearly announce that I have no connection with any kind of promotion. don't harass me further OK. So Back those contribution as soon as possible. Sick People

I have moved this unsigned response from my talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Colorful Technology

Hello, WhiteCas

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Colorful Technology for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GirthSummit _(blether) 17:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Just to explain the above: I see above that you have been asked more than once about your editing. I have just reviewed a new article that you created which was outrageously promotional in tone, and largely a copyright violation of the subject's website. I believe that you are editing for pay without making the proper disclosures, which is a breech of the terms of use of this website which you agree to abide by whenever you click on the 'Publish changes' button (see WP:PAID). If this is not the case, and you are genuinely editing as a volunteer and have no financial stake in the subjects you choose to write about, then I am afraid that your idea of what constitutes the neutral, encyclopaedic tone that we aim for is not compatible with this project (see WP:NOTPROMO), and your disregard for our copyright policies is unacceptable (see WP:COPYVIO), and so the block is still necessary. If you wish to appeal this, you will need to demonstrate an understanding of the policies I've mentioned above. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 17:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Colorful Technology Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Colorful Technology Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhiteCas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think Wikipedia misjudge me. I'm not a paid writer. I want to enrich the Wikipedia page by adding new information. That's all. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I agree there is a decent chance that you are a paid editor. (I am curious why it took you two months to request unblock if you aren't a paid editor) If you aren't, then you for whatever reason are unable to write about topics in the neutral tone required of Wikipedia. You'll need to explain any connection you have to the subjects you have edited about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AshiqurRahman7FEB per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AshiqurRahman7FEB. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhiteCas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i don't know why Wikipedia is doing with me. What should I do now?

Decline reason:

Behavioural and technical evidence indicate that you are abusing multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhiteCas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit that I edited something but that edited info is not my own tone. I research online and collect them and arrange them in a good way and published them on Wikipedia. That info was correct and if Wikipedia doesn't want to accept that what they can do. they can remove that info but the wiki team cannot block me. And I would say that some mannerless behavior I am facing from Wikipedia. I challenge you that my all edit is 100% right. If you argue with me then prove that I edited fake news

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.