User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (November)

Transport Integration Act article

Hi Wifone Sorry, I'm new to contributing to Wikipedia. Apologies if I've not done things correctly. Re your questions -

• The article was written purely be me. Basically I've just attempted to identify this particular Act, explain what it does and relate how it came to be proposed, passed and implemented. I've tried as best I can to avoid opinion and have therefore simply tried to be factual, hence all the references back to the Act itself and other relevant documents. I took some care adding references. I'd actually like to be much more effusive about this Act, but I know that sort of thing isn't permitted here.
• The refences back to the Act are entitrely uncontroversial I believe as they are either short or simply take the redaer back to the official Victorian State Government legislation web site.
• As to the two images in the aricle, the first, the picture of Westagrath railway station, just comes from Wikipedia itself. I saved it from the article in Wikipedia dealing with that station. The picture of the Transport Integration itself was taken by me earlier today on my family room table, loaded up on my PC and adopted for use in the article.

I hope this is sufficient. Cheers, Declan Declan Palmer (talk) 12:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

• Hi Declan Palmer. I think you're mistaking me with another editor who's asked you questions. I had not asked any questions. I think you're on the right path of learning the usage of Wikipedia. By the way, if you don't know already, we have a sweet editing guideline called WP:BOLD, which encourages you to not worry about inadvertently treading on our policies or guidelines. There're a lot of helpful editors, including I, who'll more than be pleased to assist you. Drop in here for any support any time. Best wishes. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 02:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Cheers Wifone, thanks for that. I have to say that you guys are impressive. Knowing how many other new people like me must be editing and contributing, you appear to have the patience of saints. Thanks again. I'll read up on that editing guideline. Cheers,Declan Palmer (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

• Happy editing :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 03:38, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Peter Ralston Reinstatement Request

Hi, There was an error made in the decision to delete the Peter Ralston article from wikipedia. I understand that a lot of the material is sourced by him however there are thousands of people that studied with him in the Bay Area. Others that can verify Peter Ralston as a viable source. John Nieters L.Ac http://www.johnnieters.com/HealthCare/index.html, Scott Jensenhttp://10000victories.com/about/sifu_jensen.html, Alan Roberts http://www.aikidonz.com/, Kevin Magee 3rd Dan Aikido. What does the wikipedia community need for this article to remain online? I vote to reinstate the article titled Peter Ralston.

Brendan —Preceding unsigned comment added by209.99.195.26 (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

• Hi Brendon. In its current state, it's very hard to reinstate the article on Peter Ralston. Might I recommend you read the following few non-negotiable Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which have to be followed for any biography to be included on Wikipedia?:

• Notability
• Notability guidelines specifically for biographies
• Rules to be followed while writing biographies of living persons; read the point on requirement of verifiability of each line in a biography
• What is meant by verifiability
• What is meant by writing an article in a neutral point of view

Also additionally read up an important guideline on how to identify reliable sources:

• WP:RS

Feel free to write back to me or to any other Wikipedia editor for any help. Best. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 02:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Question following an unblock decline.

Dear Wifione, Thank you for your argumented and clear answer. Let me copy/paste the core point leading me to ask you a (last ?) question : ME : "On same idea, I haven't added link of SkoBrowser (on purpose, it was not an oversight) in the page if you look more closely in the edit history"
YOU : At the same time, if I perceive one of your statements correctly, you claim that you've not tried to add any link like that. Our records don't corroborate that. There's a clear contradiction here."
You joined the correct link to your reply so I can't deny you got it from somewhere. Though I am puzzled how you got it. I remembered that I tried to put the link at first time on the article and, as Wikipedia warned me that putting a link may have consequences - and lead me to read COI link, I backed and finally have removed it before submitting. I can't remember how long it was between the 2 submissions, but it was very short time. When looking at the edit history of the page, I can't find any track of this link so I supposed that the submission with link was cancelled.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Game_server_browser&action=history : only one edit from me
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Game_server_browser&diff=388877885&oldid=379961106 : there is no link in my submission

I can't find any other wikipedia sources with this link... Could you tell me from where you knew about that link and/or show me the wikipedia's link where it appears.

Anyway, you got it, I am screwed !

Thank you. Regards.

SkorpSSS :-P —Preceding unsigned comment added by88.167.79.23 (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry for blocking you. It's inevitable. Get another name and drop in for any assistance you might require on Wikipedia. And about your link, yes, our records showed it up. Thanks and regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 03:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:Broadf & User:Gynonc

Hi, Wifione. I listed these users at WP:UAA less because the usernames are explicitly promotional than because, together with the users' edits, they disclose a violation of WP:NOSHARE in that they confirm that the account is editing on behalf of a group, company or organization rather than as an individual. As WP:NOSHARE is incorporated as a subhead of WP:USERNAME -- something that has always struck me as odd, since the problem of sharing accounts is typically only indicated by the username, which in itself is only a tangential issue, but whatever -- I don't immediately see how a violation of WP:NOSHARE can be intrepreted as anything but a violation of the username policy, at least as it's currently crafted. Perhaps WP:NOSHARE needs to be gotten out from under WP:USERNAME, but at the moment it looks like an adjunct. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Rrburke. Good to see you around here. I'll respond to this in some time. Sincerely. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 18:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I went through all the edits of both the users. My view (and I believe this will be the view of most administrators) is that unless the name is extremely similar to or the same as an organisation's name, and unless the edits corroborate the same link to the organisation, it'll be tough to consider the user name a group account. In the above two cases, the case could be more for CoI than for blocking. You could leave a note on their talk pages commenting on CoI. And yes, the Noshare issue, while I have no particular views for or against your pov, you could bring up your pov on the user names talk page. Feel free to write back to me for any support, clarification, yada :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 18:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar

		The Resilient Barnstar
		For disagreeing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Blakemanwithout becoming disagreeable. Bearian (talk) 19:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

• Like totally honoured and overwhelmed :-) My deportment really should have been quintessentially better. But you're too gracious. Thanks Sir. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 03:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Stop it

An "only warning" [1] is uncalled for and you know it. What about the four-step warning process? How about reading WP:POINT: something was tongue-in-cheek and not an attack does not deserve an "only warning"; you need to lighten up and follow the rules.

If I see you make any edit like this again, I will report you immediately. — Timneu22 · talk 10:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

• I'll continue this discussion on your talk page with a renewed request to you to not believe that calling Sarah Palin an idiot, is ok. Even at an AfD, this can line you up for a warning and a subsequent block if you continue using such words to address living persons. Do feel free to report me; as long as that ensures you refrain from addressing living persons derogatorily in the future. Regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 11:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

• • Bouncing these conversations between talk pages is annoying. It should have been kept here. At any rate, "only warning" is my problem. It should have been a general warning. An "only warning" is incredibly over the top. —Timneu22 · talk 11:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

• Note left on your talk page. I'm assuming good faith and hoping that you'll refrain from addressing living persons with disparaging remarks in the future. Thanks and regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 11:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

He's already indeffed and there's no interest in undoing that currently.

What's he gonna do; get put on "Double Secret" indef if he isn't careful? HalfShadow 19:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

hi

Yo - I just wanted to say hi to let you know I haven't disappeared :) Regarding adminship, I will hold off for longer than I expected, because my activity will be restricted for a couple of months due to a few work commitments. I do have an agenda though -I'll use that interval for getting one FA/GA done (slowly, obviously, but I've already done quite a bit to build up the Janata Party article), a few more DYKs (easier), RC patrol and other chores. First of all, though, I need to work on Greater Bangladesh. Thank you for your support all this way! Shiva (Visnu) 09:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

• No problems :) I'll be waiting. Best. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 15:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Hi Wifione. Do you still have a need for "Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not" to be in Template space? Nothing links to it. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

• Ha ha :) Of course, it has to be there. Something important does link to it. If you're in for a quick quiz, find it out yourself :) If not, I'll tell you after you leave a reply. Thanks for the note. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 07:09, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks! No, don't tell me. You peaked my interest. I'll see of I can figure it out. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Super :):) I'll wait for your reply. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
      • You have engaged in some sort of sorcery to make that message appear at the top of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not&action=edit Editing Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Evil or good sorcery of which I am unsure. I'm thinking it has to do something with meta or something like that, 'cause when things don't make sense, the answer usually is meta or has meta in it. Metawiki? Maybe. Hum. I'll figure it out. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
        • You're very sweet :):):) At least you're trying and have reached somewhere. I can tell you that technically, you have the answer. So firstly, the template page has to be there because it notifies any user who is trying to edit Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not of the policy imperative. So your analysis on that part is perfect. If you wish to further find out how this sorceryhappens, feel free to search a bit again - I'm sure you'll be able to find out :):) If you're not able to, just drop a line back. I've got to go right now to code up some more low-level data and will see your reply after a few hours. Thanks again for the reply and best of luck for the search :):) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 11:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
          • Per Wikipedia:Editnotice, "Some of the header boxes that you see when editing a page (or viewing the code of a protected page) are not editnotices, instead they are MediaWiki interface messages." Yes, and some are not. That clears everything up. Well, I read the rest of that page and that is as far as I got. It either is appearing at the top of the page through maybe {{Sprotect}}or some MediaWiki wacky way. I'm at the edge of my coding knowledge universe, so any additional information would be most greatfully received and would allow me to avoid similar template query use talk page postings in the future. -- Uzma Gamal(talk) 11:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Uzma :) Sorry for the delayed reply. Ok. The deal is that the file you've been referring to, is actually the Edit notice for What Wikipedia is not. Whenever you attempt to edit any page, there're two edit notice links that come on the top right corner of the edit box. One is the Group notice, the other is the page notice. What you've been trying to decode is the page notice that I created for What Wikipedia is not. While normal users can edit and change the group notice and edit notice on their personal user and talk pages, other group and edit notices can only be edited by either administrators or editors with the Account creator permission; that's the reason you've been able to only view the edit notice of the particular page. Write back any time now or in the future for any assistance. Enjoy your experience here :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Do you know mechanism that causes the Editnotice to be shown above the edit window when you edit Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not? Is it {{Sprotect}} or something via MediaWiki? Also, if possible, please consider adding "Category:Pages with editnotices" to the page. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Not a problem. I've added the category you desired to What Wikipedia is not. And with respect to the Editnotice, the template {{editnotice load}} causes editnotices throughout Wikipedia to be loaded. Cheers. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 15:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again! -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

And might I add that you have a kind heart way that comes through in your discussion writings. Though we now go our seperate ways, may our paths cross again someday. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Likewise, it has been a pleasure having you here on my talk page :) Best wishes and drop in whenever... Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 02:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

AFD/Moshe Sachs

Fantastic close, well done! I would have closed it as delete when I relisted except that there were assertions of systemic bias and assurances that sources did exist. Despite 3 keep votes after that no-one came up with sources which was what I relisted for. I just wanted to drop you a note to commend you for correctly applying policy in assessing the consensus. Spartaz^Humbug! 10:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

You're too gracious :) I'm overwhelmed. Thanks so much for the message. Sincere regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I also want to commend you for how you handled this matter, even though I argued to keep the article. Clearly, the lack of reliable sources was the fatal flaw. My frustration is that I believe the man is, in the abstract and outside of Wikipedia policy concerns, notable. However, your decision is right until the sources can be found. I hope that an editor with good connections in Israel or among the ultra-Orthodox, takes up your offer to "userfy" the article and then searches for such sources. Thank you.Cullen328 (talk) 06:40, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

In the aftermath of this AFD close, a few editors (myself included) have expressed concern that there is an inherent difficulty in finding sources for notable institutions and people inside insular Jewish communities. A mini discussion is going onhere at a new AFD but it is not the right place for the topic. Would you be interested in helping me create a policy change initiative so that WP:N/WP:V could deal with notable but insular topics? (I'm a bit shy of approaching policy pages and such.) Joe407 (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

• Joe407, thanks. I should love to assist you. However, you'll have to throw more light on what change are you looking at so that I can comment further. Thanks Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
• Cullen328, hi :) Your message is highly appreciated by me (and much as you had voted to keep the article). I do hope the article gets recreated with sources subsequently. Best regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your vote at Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/PresN?

It would seem that your name is floating in between support votes 47 and 48. Considering that there are no comments at the end, and it isn't struck throguh, I think it might be some sort of error. It looks like it's going to pass anyways, but I just wanted to let you know. Sven Manguard_Talk 20:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

• Oh hiyo Sven! That's just a good natured question I'm asking from Brewcrewer, who's voted above me; not a mistake :-) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

re:PresN

Understandable—I'm sure he'll take all the advice and feedback to heart. Thanks again,—Deckiller (t-c-l) 00:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the note :) Regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit filters

Hi there - normally I wouldn't do this, but my request for the AbuseFilter right has been up for 9 days and hasn't been commented or acted on. Would you like to comment on whether you feel it would be beneficial for me to get the tools? Thanks! --Addihockey10^e-mail 03:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

• Hi ADH10/Addihockey. I'm sorry to see that nobody has commented till now. This generally happens when not many editors are conversant with your background and/or your benefit to the edit filter extension. I should mention that neither am I; but that in no way restricts you from getting the right. You have to realise that even normal editors are allowed to comment and support/reject your candidature for getting the edit filter right. If a consensus is established soon, you would be granted the right. Might I suggest you post a neutral statement adhering to WP:Canvass on the Village Pump (in the same way as one would perhaps publicise the community's attention towards a topic)? This will at least bring other editors to the forum to comment. Please feel free to leave another note in case even that doesn't work in eliciting comments, or in case you need any other help. I'll be more than pleased to assist you. Thanks and sincere regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 04:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Jeff Ragsdale: methinks not notable

I've come upon a wikipedia page that I would classify "BLP, not notable" that I'd like to nominate for deletion. My googling to figure out how to nominate it turned up your name :) I followed some of your links and discovered that I'd need to log in to do that, or I should ask somebody to do it.... "you've won!" :) The page is Jeff Ragsdale. Originally I saw the page used as a "resume" in an ad on craigslist. It is heavily edited by a very small number of contributors, and when I added a "notability" tag, one of them deleted it, and when I added an "RfC" on the talk page, it was also deleted. Article contains a very large number of citations, but if you look closely, the citations refer to a couple of incidents where he made a public spectacle and it got picked up by local newspapers. (For example, standing in a public park in NYC with a sign around his neck apologizing to his girlfriend.) Somebody with the same username maintains an extensive youtube video library, including his gameshow win but the videos do not attract many views. Seems to me, probably a nice guy, interesting friend, maybe a little attention seeking (in a good way!) but not notable. This just in, I see the same editors have added him with photo as the example on the media prank, publicity stunt, and Street theatre pages.71.190.77.101 (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

fyi, editor Sailsbystars has resurrected the RfC that I added that got deleted, so perhaps the matter will work itself out.71.190.77.101 (talk) 22:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

• Hi :) Don't worry. Like you mention, there're enough editors watching this issue now. It'll sort itself out in the appropriate manner. In case you need help or future assistance, feel free to drop in. Best. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 16:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Quick question...

Isn't User:Wifione/sandbox/tobedeleted a copyvio? I'm not really sure it's appropriate to use it, even for testing purposes.Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Chase, of course you are right. This was deliberately put as I believed that if we wished to test the prospective administrator, one of her past handled cases would be a good test. No issues with this being deleted if you want to although I would have preferred Panyd to give it a quick run-through and answer it before the deletion. However, please do delete it whenever you wish. (you could leave a note on the RfA that you've deleted this post discussions with me). Thanks and best regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 04:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I think in this case it falls under fair use as an educational tool - we'll G12 it once she's done. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 05:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

• Zeleted :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message}

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010
Updated every week
News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations In the news: Jimbo Wales interviewed and parodied; Wikipedia in politics Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football Features and admins: The best of the week Election report: Candidates still stepping forward Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page· Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

THANK-YOU

Thank you for directing me to my reply- I fell into this site quite by accident- but "SERENDIPITY" has never been more defined.Ineed2knownow (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

• You're welcome :) Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 19:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry. Money.news (talk) 04:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

No problems. From now on, just try and make friends out here when you try to improve pages. That'll solve the issue. Drop in for any assistance you might require in the future. Best. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 09:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I will be in touch. Got so much to read now. Money.news (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

You granted me rollback rights recently. I thank you for that. About my not often leaving messages on users' talk pages after reverting, every time I try to do this, by the time I get to the user's talk page someone else has already said what I would say about the situation. Thanks again. KezianAvenger™ 12:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

• Hey Kezian, good to see you here! Actually I noticed otherwise - that no message had been posted either by you or by any other editor. Try and use Huggle/Twinkle for your reversions. They either prompt you to leave a message or automatically leave a message, depending on the versions/preferences you are using. Best of luck for the experience; and drop in for any help anytime. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 13:11, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
  • That's strange. But I have started to comment on these people's pages a bit more now. Anyways, thanks for the advice!KezianAvenger™ 23:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Great :-) Like I mentioned, drop in for any help you may wish in the future. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 16:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Permissions granting

Hey Wifione. Just a little friendly advice for you to follow or ignore as you please! ;) I noticed that, when you grant permissions from the WP:PERM pages, you sometimes leave advice for the editor. In my experience, though, editors tend not to check on those pages unless they're wondering why they haven't been flagged, so you might find it more productive to leave the advice on their talk page. Also, User:Amalthea has made a couple of handy scripts that you might find useful. User:Amalthea/MakeReviewer.js for granting reviewer in one click from a userpage and User:Amalthea/MakeRollbacker.js, the same, but for rollback. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

• Amazing to see you here HJ :) I shall follow what you've written; it's very sweet of you to leave a note. By the way, am sending you an email in a while. Check it out and respond wherever you wish (I mean, either on email or here). And yes, it's great to see you around. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 13:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Wifione, thank you for your considered questions and your even more considered support. It means a lot to me to have someone who I feel is an excellent administrator supporting and I will definitely be raiding your monobook page! I hope our paths will continue to cross and if you ever need help with anything please let me know. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Your words are overwhelming :-) I'll cherish them. My best wishes for your future as an administrator. Panyd, my sincere regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 16:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

About the AWB request: Err.........K

Hey Thanx for replying, I do a lot of editing and research, you are right my count is ~333, I felt using the AWB would make things easier..... sorry if wasted your time......... :) Msrafiq (talk) 17:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Rafiq. Actually your AWB request has not been rejected (or accepted) as of right now. I only need to know why you wish to use AwB. Unfortunately, even this reply of yours doesn't make that clear. If you might be able to give me an idea of what would you wish to use AwB for, I'll grant you the rights if it seems all right. Please note; even I got my AwB right much before the 500 mark. Warm regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 18:02, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Thanx Wifione! well, lets see, I generally contribute towards Afghan History, when the topics and pages are read and edited by users from that region, they are usually not good with their English and Wiki skills, so, I end up with poor quality articles, mistakes and so on. As you know, I am a member of the WikiProject Afghanistan. Things would be much more simpler and easier with AWB, or that is what they tell me, as I havent used AWB yet, and before I tried, I had to be given approval. I really dont know what else to say...... Thanx again.Msrafiq (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Cool. I'm granting you the right on good faith :-) Please read the documentation of AWB very well before using it. For any help, drop in here or ask the Gods of AwBthemselves. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 18:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

WoW! Thanx a million bro! you aint the coolest Mod here for no reason you know :). I will try not to disappoint. Thanx.Msrafiq (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Be very diligent in your use. And very careful (remember, editors can even get blocked for wrong use of AwB). So learn well, and use it well. Best always. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 19:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
Election notice
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 02:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)