Welcome

edit

Hello, Wikijuniorwarrior, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 16:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Draft:Heroes of 71

edit
Hello Wikijuniorwarrior as this was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE I've restored it upon your request. Izno may have more information that you could find useful assuming you want to work on improving this page. That page was originally an article that was pushed back to draft for improvement, once it meets article standards, feel free to move back to article space. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 20:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Awesome. Thank you. Wikijuniorwarrior (talk) 00:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
As you have been barred from editing, you won't be able to work on this article now - should you return in the future please see WP:REFUND if you would like it redeleted. — xaosflux Talk 13:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussions

edit

Hi. I have seen your contributions in various places today and can tell that you have a strongly inclusionist stance in deletion discussions. That is fine and even laudible as long as the !votes are in good faith and meet a basic threshold of reasonableness. However, the DRV you filed here was not defensible as the article was a BLP violation and there was no acceptable previous version to revert to. Frankly, I'm curious how you came across that two-and-one-half-year-old deletion in the first place. I'm not going to comment on your other !votes today, but if you make more nominations of that nature, your pattern of edits is going to start to appear trollish. Please give this some thought. Thank you, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Newyorkbrad: I saw an old discussion about a potential draft. Like above with [1], I wanted to see if it could be worked on. I didn't know about the BLP problems, that wasn't clear in the MFD. Wikijuniorwarrior (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Huon (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive277#And another. This person is banned from Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikijuniorwarrior (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok but why am I blocked?

Decline reason:

Banned is banned. You can appeal to arbcom as I'll be removing talk pages access. NeilN talk to me 02:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I really don't understand what I did wrong. Wikijuniorwarrior (talk) 02:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply