Williamwang363

October 2017

• ClueBot NG did not know that the edit was constructive. The robot even undid the worldwide release for The Sims Mobile. Now no one's going to know when will the worldwide release be. Also, iOS is not just iPhone and it's actually iPhone, iPad, etc.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Sims Mobile was changed by Williamwang363 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951139 on 2017-10-29T13:18:37+00:00 .

Thank you.

Final Warning Vandalism

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Garretka (talk) 02:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

2020 New Year Message During Covid

January 1

Happy New Year and welcome to 2020 and a new decade of improving climate change issues.

January 25

I wish you all a happy Lunar New Year.

February 2020

I wish you all a happy Valentine's Day on February 14.

Weather predictions

You cannot present a possible future event as fact, especially when it is about the weather. Wikicanada1127 (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Jellico Mountain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jellico Mountain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 23:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

April 22

Happy 50th anniversary of Earth Day everyone. Remember to continue protecting our planet from further climate change. Methane gas emitted from cows disrupt the ozone layer in the outer reaches of the Earth's atmosphere, so please be careful when trying to eat beef. Opt for pork instead. Thank You!

April 24, JFK Airport first edit warring warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John F. Kennedy International Airport; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

For your information, the padlocks are only displayed on articles that are protected. If you feel that an article needs to be protected, you should file a request at WP:RFPP. Please do not edit war with bots that are operating correctly. Mjroots (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

June 11

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 🐔 Chicdat ^ChickenDatabase 11:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jellico Mountain

Hello, Williamwang363. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jellico Mountain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forest Glen station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Failure to Cite Evidence First Offense

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hurricane Katrina, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Duluth, Georgia

I removed unsourced material from the article. You re-added it - without an explanation, and without any sources. Care to explain why you did that? It's borderline disruptive editing and can certainly result in you being blocked if you keep it up. JimKaatFan (talk) 14:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Would you mind giving me an explanation if what I done is disruptive editing or vandalism, because what I done could have also been contributing to edit warring? Williamwang363 (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources. The text that is directly relevant to this case is "In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article." (emphasis mine) JimKaatFan (talk) 22:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for that. Will definitely not forget this time and thank you for the reminder. Williamwang363 (talk) 23:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Removing template WMATA type from many stations

Hi, I noticed you removed the {{WMATA type}} template from many of the station pages. Was there a discussion or other consensus reached to remove it? Otherwise it seems like that discussion should be had and the removals reverted. Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

There is a controversy here. Then who removed a lot of rapid transit station template from major transfer hubs, such as Metro Center, Gallery Place, and L Enfant Plaza, for instance. We need to get to the bottom of this. Williamwang363 (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Huh. I guess I'll have to poke around more to figure out why that template has been removed overtime, since it seems overall useful. I've started a section on the project talk page, I think: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Washington_Metro#Why_has_Template:WMATA_type_been_slowly_removed_from_station_pages?. Skynxnex (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

That is especially true for major transfer hubs. Now without all that, it makes it very ambiguous. When I attempted to add it back, someone would revert it within a few hours. Again, thank you for trying to figure out who is behind all of that mess. Williamwang363 (talk) 23:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

@Williamwang363 See the project page linked above. I'm still pondering this (and might mean I agree with the removal in the end, I just had originally thought it was a weird mass removal without any discussion--but that isn't true on Pi.'s part) but I think it makes sense to pause and I didn't mean for you to revert/add back a bunch of stuff if there was a reason. I'm a bit confused by you saying figure out who is behind all of that mess when before I asked you, you removed it on many pages. So, stop. And discuss on the project page is probably the best action. Skynxnex (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I guess you are right on this one. Thank you for the discussion page anyway. Williamwang363 (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced material

Hi I saw you left a message on my talk page. There is indeed a valid source covering the changes from WMATA themselves. Plus the name change has been approved for months now, but have yet become official. Here is the source below:

Metro to implement five station name changes Sept. 11

This means the changes have been official but have yet to be updated on Wikipedia and maps. Someone has already did North Bethesda station on this edit here.

Also, I forgot to mention Downtown Largo was approved in January here. Swagging (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, and for getting rid of the confusion that I was having earlier. I will promise to not mislead you again. Williamwang363 (talk) 02:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, it cool lol. Swagging (talk) 12:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Vienna station

Why did you add the GMU to the main station name? It is the secondary name. I have fixed it. Fastfoodfanatic (talk) 16:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

I am telling you this because GMU is within the proximity of Vienna station. Williamwang363 (talk) 01:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Plagiarism First Offense

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to MARTA rail, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. In addition, please don't replace entire articles with the contents of other articles like you did here. That is disruptive editing. Epicgenius (talk) 15:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

@Epicgenius I deeply apologize for what I have done recently to several MARTA articles, and I promise to not do it again. Can you please forgive me and not tell a Wikipedia admin to block me for the disruptive editing? Williamwang363 (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Williamwang363, I personally forgive you, but it's not me you need to convince; it's the administrators who look at your edits. If they see a pattern of disruptive editing, they may very well block you. This also goes for adding information without reliable sources. You should take the advice that was given to you in the section below, to prevent yourself from being further sanctioned.

I Epicgenius (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Unsourced Material Warning

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ⸺(Random)staplers 18:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

• Also, this edit summary is highly misleading. You should know better than that.⸺(Random)staplers 18:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
• Williamwang363, let me emphasize something to you. You need to cite sources. You need to look at sources. I've reverted two edits where you just changed information, like Special:Diff/1240380686 and said it was a minor edit. It is not a minor edit if you're changing ostensibly factual information.
• I would advise double checking your edits again, and again, and again. Please break the bad habit of making assumptions when editing.⸺(Random)staplers 19:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

  • You've got lots of unsourced additions to MARTA pages and a lot of misleading minor edits too, months after your block. At this point, I don't know what to do here. Paging @Yamla.⸺(Random)staplers 19:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

I agree this user's edits are significantly problematic. If their edits do not meaningfully and immediately improve after this notification, please let me know. --Yamla (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

---

Do not change the exact dates, as variants of SARS-CoV-2 can change at a moments notice.

Also, why are you nitpicking these small details (that may be important) instead of verifying sources, or your previous edits?⸺(Random)staplers 18:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Seriously, over a variants of Covid article. If you have disputes, please post the comment on the talk page of the Variants of SARS-COV-2 article, not mine. Williamwang363 (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

• @Yamla, what do you think of this edit summary? Special:Permalink/1244897353.⸺(Random)staplers 22:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

• Williamwang363, threatening to start an edit war is almost enough by itself to justify a block. Given your history of inappropriate edits, your next block will be for an extended period or will be indefinite. I strongly urge you never to make another threat like that and never to make another inappropriate edit. --Yamla (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  So what if you do catch me make another inappropriate edit? What are you going to do about it? Block me indefinitely or for an extended period of five to ten years? Williamwang363 (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  That would depend on the edit. --Yamla (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

---

Here's the thing Williamwang363: I don't think you should be punished for just this one edit over "Variants of SARS-CoV-2", especially since it's your one edit after being heavily warned. However, your previous edits are problematic, and you need to demonstrate that you are capable of editing productively. That either means substantial edits that improve articles, or at the very least, going to articles you've edited, and adding citations to the edits you've made, and undoing the ones that are problematic.

The reason why I'm talking to you directly, and not posting this to the talk page, is because I didn't add the date. So it would be pointless for me to gauge consensus on that issue in particular. Also, let me remind you that it was your problematic editing of {{as of}} dates that got everyone to check the sources in the first place.

In any case, it might be best for you to act as if this is your last warning. Demonstrate good edits, and editors might be less exacerbated at you. Just my two cents.

I'm going to undo this edit one more time. If you have something to add, please make it substantial, and backed by citations. Don't just defer to consensus. And please don't threaten to edit war.⸺(Random)staplers 23:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@Randomstaplers What are you talking about? For which of my previous edits was heavily problematic, and does it pertain to the SARS-COV-2 article that you mentioned? Williamwang363 (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.