Wipeblade39

Hello, Wipeblade39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! FOX 52 (talk) 07:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Afghan Air Force

Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Afghan Air Force article. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Are you disputing the 159 Black Hawks? I added a reliable source, there are dozens of news reports to back that. Also, why did you undo the update in Afghan_Air_Force#Organization? In the infobox you put 217 aircraft but in the Afghan_Air_Force#Organization you put 96. Please respect my edits. I'm only trying to improve the article.--Wipeblade39 (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Afghan Air Force. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Afghan Air Force

For any further major changes to the Afghan Air Force article, please take it to the talk page - FOX 52 (talk) 02:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Bagram Airfield

I've reverted the move from Bagram Airfield to Bagram Air Base. Airfield was settled on after long debate on the talk page, since it's the actual name of the facility given to it by the Department of the Army. Please open discussion there before making major changes. CatCube (talk) 00:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 19:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)