Wkn96

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Modak (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xegma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debjani Modak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xegma(talk) 18:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Xegma, Thanks for taking out your valuable time and reviewing and giving your feedback. Could you please help what other reliable sources(can you please list out or attest some templates as a reference for better understanding to make the content acceptable and approvable. Thanks for the help! Wkn96 (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Wkn96! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Xegma(talk) 18:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Modak (May 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No real improvement since Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Debjani_Modak

Qcne (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Wkn96, sorry I have to reject this draft. The Times of India really is unreliable for entertainment subjects so should not be used, and that just leaves mostly non-independent Youtube clips. Qcne (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Debjani Modak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Debjani Modak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debjani Modak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CNMall41 (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sir/Ma'am/Bot, I completely understand it but I tried my best to put all the references here to prove the content valid and also quick question if you don't mind... do these rules apply for all the pages similar way because I encountered lot of other pages where I did not find any additional references from what I tried to add. Nevertheless, Will work on it and your suggestions would be valuable to keep this thing going with right validations. Thanks and Appreciate your help. Instead of providing guidelines to help in improving the content. There are so many users out there who wanted to remove this page due to extreme vandalism and Partiality. Glad you helped. Thank you once again.

curprev 18:25, 14 August 2023‎ Arumobileworld talk contribs‎ m 2,959 bytes 0‎ Arumobileworld moved page... Publish page to mainspace undothank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added Wkn96 (talk) 16:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)