User talk:WorldProtectors

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldProtectors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am not affiliated with FilmLover2016, I have no clue who that is or why I am accused of being him but it's not me WorldProtectors (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it. If you have nothing to do with the other account, you will need to explain why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 18:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldProtectors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I don't know why you think I'm FilmLover2016 but I'm not. Can you please explain this supposed evidence so I can at least know why I am being accused?

Decline reason:

We don't do that because it would allow people who habitually sock puppet to figure out how to do it without being caught again. If you really aren't FilmLover, you should look into who he is and try to explain to us why we're mistaken in thinking you're him. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldProtectors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Then how do you expect me to able to prove it's not me? That makes no sense! All of FilmLover2016's edits on his contributions page are all things I have no idea about!

Decline reason:

We can't tell you any more than what Daniel told you. If you are unable to do that, then we will have to make do without your potential contributions. 331dot (talk) 17:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldProtectors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

That is ridiculous! How am I supposed to dispute your supposed evidence, if I have no clue what it is. There's nothing for me to explain because I did nothing wrong and have no idea why I'm being accused of being some rando

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorldProtectors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Seriously, what makes you think I'm this random person? I'm not. Please refrain from banning people unless you have actual evidence of the things you are accusing them of

Decline reason:

User admitted to Using multiple accounts in UTRS appeal #39570. At this point, I simply don't care who the sock-master is. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Asked and answered. Since these requests are becoming repetitive and you are unable or unwilling to provide an explanation, I am removing access to this page. When someone else declines your request, that will leave you with WP:UTRS should you either choose to be honest with us, or provide the explanation that you have been asked for. 331dot (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

UTRS

UTRS appeal #45498 Declined. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #109073 is currently under discussion. JBW (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #110146 was declined by another admin. User is in danger of losing UTRS access. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)