User talk:Xaosflux/Archive41

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Xaosflux in topic History of Rajasthan


Does Template:Update have a documentation= parameter?

I don't see a |documentation= parameter in the code for {{update}}. Am I missing something? – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I just used it wrong, tweaked. — xaosflux Talk 15:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
That makes sense. Templates with multiple unnamed and named parameters do not make sense, but that's a battle for a different day. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

bot task

Hi. I hope you are doing well.
I am actively back at WP:RM, and moving pages. Recently I closed a few moves, where I had to perform find & replace task through AWB (eg this, and this Bell TV RM). The first RM's page didn't have many incoming links. But the Bell TV page is going to be a dab page, and the article is going to be moved to Bell Satellite TV. So the bot will not be able to fix the redirects, and I have to update the links manually. As of right now, I am running a find & replace task on around 450 pre-parsed pages that link to Bell TV. Do you think requesting a bot task for that (find & replace tasks) would be appropriate? As I think I will be coming across such situations often in the future. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

@Usernamekiran: can you give me an example of one or two of the diffs that you would want to run under a bot flag? — xaosflux Talk 15:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
[1], [2], [3]. I am currently doing it, so 100 or so edits under special:contributions//Usernamekiran (AWB) would be such edits. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Usernamekiran: Have you looked over the options/other bots that can already deal with this at Wikipedia:Requested moves? — xaosflux Talk 15:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I don't think there is a bot at RM for this. There might be some bot with this or similar task approved. But that would mean I will have to wait till the bot operator comes online. Whereas if I had the approval, I can do it whenever the need arises. As this is a basic, and uncontroversial task; I thought I should ask about it. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Usernamekiran: most of these can't be that time sensitive - however if you want to you can file a WP:BRFA - as you are using something like AWB that means that all the account edits will be bot flagged, so you will want to use a dedicated account for this type of task (and only for BRFA approved tasks). — xaosflux Talk 16:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thank you. Also, can you suggest me a username for the bot account? KiranBOT sounds way too uncool. I love DumDumBOT, but Primeface thinks it would look too similar to DumbBOT. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Usernamekiran: User:KiranBOT seems fine, this bot is for quiet background updates - it doesn't need to be "cool". — xaosflux Talk 16:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
How about User:DumDumBOT? —usernamekiran (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Usernamekiran: sounds bad - it niether describes the operator relationship or the function. — xaosflux Talk 16:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
For what it's worth they already have User:Usernamekiran BOT. Primefac (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
@Primefac: lol. You, and me both are sounding like kids telling on each-other to some older person. hehe   But you guys are right, I think should go with KiranBOT. Not trying to argue, but I got the idea for DumDumBOT from DumbBOT. Thank you for your inputs, and apologies for me annoying you. See you guys around   —usernamekiran (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Jeez

I know you were talking about global locking, but I have to say, seeing "GLOCK" in your edit summary on BN gave me a bit of a spook, because it made me think of something very different. We should really think of a better contraction as a community... Writ Keeper  15:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

@Writ Keeper: duck! On meta, think I normally just say "GL". — xaosflux Talk 16:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Could not ping you, so...

 
Hello, Xaosflux. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Deindexing talk pages.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aasim 23:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Awesome Aasim: thanks for the note, I added a bunch of technical notes there too - will be useful if it closes as successful or if anyone has any technical questions. — xaosflux Talk 23:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Partial blocks

If I apply a partial block to an article, does that block extend to the target article's talk page as well, or would that have to be enumerated separately? OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: each would need to be listed individually. — xaosflux Talk 18:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Marvel Animated Universe

Can you remove the protection level for Marvel Animated Universe page as they officially confirmed it's existence.

To request a protection change, please see WP:RFPP. — xaosflux Talk 16:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

They're not listening to me.

@NoobMaster01: first please sign your posts so we know who to reply to, second the best way to show that your newly proposed article should replace a redirect is to write a good article to go there, you can go to Draft:Marvel Animated Universe and start anytime. — xaosflux Talk 11:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Marvel_Animated_Universe Okay, I have made the draft what should I do next?NoobMaster01 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@NoobMaster01: I tagged your draft for a new article reviewer to review - you can track progress at the top of it. I don't normally volunteer in that area, so you will really just need to wait now. — xaosflux Talk 14:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

How much time I have to wait? NoobMaster01 (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@NoobMaster01: I don't know - like I said I don't volunteer in that area - it can take some time as Wikipedia:There is no deadline for articles. — xaosflux Talk 15:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

My recent edit

I like to respect closure discussions in general. I trust it won't surprise you to learn that my recent addition to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Please_remove_my_user_rights was composed before I saw that you had close the discussion. While I don't think the OP handle this in the best way possible. I interpreted the request for removal of rights as a way of saying the community has treated me wrong. I don't know whether there is merit to that of whether the present situation is recoverable but I do think it's worth a little checking to see if it could've been handled better.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: I removed the archive wrapper from that thread as it is still being discussed. — xaosflux Talk 15:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Xaosflux, Thanks S Philbrick(Talk) 15:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Technical Wishes: FileImporter

Hi @Xaosflux:, I was pretty late for my response to your question, so here it is (here is the link to the previous discussion):

We were trying to keep the documentation for FileImporter and all related documents in the same place, which is the reason why it is in the MediaWiki:Extension namespace. However, you should have full access to the config file with you global wiki account. -- For the Technical Wishes Team: Max Klemm (WMDE) (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

@Max Klemm (WMDE): thanks for the note, I think that's a bad idea but it's not up to me of course! (This configuration mostly impacts commons - so I think it probably belongs on commons: - where pages can be protected and monitored by that community if they are getting disrupted.) I think mw: is fine for documentation, just not running configuration. — xaosflux Talk 11:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Xaosflux:, thanks. I will discuss your feedback with my team and will contact you when there are news in those regards. -- For the Technical Wishes Team: Max Klemm (WMDE) (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvel Animated Universe (August 27)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 
Hello, Xaosflux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Looks like you submitted this draft for NoobMaster01 (talk · contribs), I've copied this notification over to his talk page accordingly. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

It's not a Copy and Paste of Marvel Animated Universe as I am the one who created the article and the consensus was made at 2011 and it's 2020 now and they officially confirmed it's existence now. NoobMaster01 (talk) 11:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

@NoobMaster01: sorry, but I really don't want to work on this at all - please follow up at the links that were placed on your draft. — xaosflux Talk 11:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Arameans article

Hello there, could you please place protection on the Arameans article again, which is highly in need of it, due to edit warring with a group of national vandalists. Many thanks in advance. --Optra2021 (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

[5] ——Serial 10:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
@Optra2021: to request a protection review you may post at WP:RFPP. — xaosflux Talk 11:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello there!

Hummm... It seems there have been rumors you have gained another talk page stalker... How amazing is that! I can offer to figure out who it is if you would like.:) Lindjosh (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

I have 303, no big deal. — xaosflux Talk 21:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Eddie891
  AngelaJcw69Just ChillingPhilg88Viajero

  CheckUser changes

  SQL

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
  • A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
  • A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

  Arbitration


Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Interface admin on testwiki

Can I bug you to take a look at testwiki:Wikipedia:Requests/Permissions/Jackmcbarn? It's been there for about a month without any activity, and it's really painful to test script changes without it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:WikiProject Lebanon on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Help with regex

Xaos, hey there! :)

Can you help me set up a certain find and replace regex? I need to find all words that have space between them and then add one slash after the first word.

So, for example:

Text text

becomes

Text\ text

I used \w \w for the find part and it worked pretty good. Then I thought I would use \w\\ \w for the replace part but the result was way off of what I was hoping for. - Klein Muçi (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Klein Muçi: may depend on your interpreter but this may work:
FIND
([^ ]+) ([^ ]+)
REPLACE
$1\ $2
xaosflux Talk 16:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Note, this will only work for the first and second words on a line - not between every word in a sentence. — xaosflux Talk 16:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
No, unfortunately it doesn't find the correct part I'm trying to find. Another user just suggested me I should use these patterns - the string is one of the real strings I'm trying to match/find and replace. That does the job. Any other way I can write the regex more "elegantly"? The user who gave me that wasn't quite secure about the writing style. Although, as I said, it does the job even like that. - Klein Muçi (talk) 16:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Like I said, these well all depend on your parser/software - lots of applications interpret regex their own ways. — xaosflux Talk 16:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm using Notepad++ to help me set up a find and replace pywikibot. But thank you anyway as I'm new to regex-es as you know and I have lots to learn. :)) - Klein Muçi (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Merging on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

@xaosflux: Thank you very much for your reply, however, can you clarify what this means?:

Wikilinks to the special page, Special:Badtitle, are being styled with class "new" - although this is a valid target. However, it still doesn't explain why it is a red link. Is it like example.com/404, where there's no actual page, but just an error message? Gioguch (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gioguch: not sure how much you know about web layout, but when Special:Badtitle is being processed server side, it gets transformed in to: <a href="/wiki/Special:Badtitle" class="new" title="Special:Badtitle (page does not exist)">Special:Badtitle</a>. Part of that transform is adding that class=new" tag, and a cascading style sheet is then telling your browser to style it red. I think that part is getting added erroneously by the wiki parser, and the development ticket I opened is asking to have that class tag removed from that link when used. Without that styling, the link will use the default colors for other links (blue). — xaosflux Talk 18:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail!

 
Hello, Xaosflux. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 00:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: ==>   Donexaosflux Talk 00:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Template editor permission

Hello – unfortunately due to non-virutal world circumstances, I missed the opportunity last month to request my template editor permission (that you granted) be extended. Can that permission be regranted? Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Goldsztajn: please drop a request at WP:PERM. — xaosflux Talk 10:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

You've got mail

 
Hello, Xaosflux. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Gioguch (talk) 01:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

your assistance please...

Could you please help me understand what is going on at User talk:DBigXray?

Yes, I see there is OTRS ticket 2020031010005932 out there, and that may limit what you can reveal.

Has DBigXray been indefinitely blocked? Or has he been given an opportunity for a fresh start, under a new wiki-ID?

I know individuals' request to have their User space pages deleted, as a courtesy, routinely have their requests agreed to. But it was my impression that requests to delete their User_talk pages were almost always denied, because those pages often contained important revisions recording discussions of policy matters that other contributors could need to consult.

Even his contributions can't be tracked.

DBigXray spent a couple of months wikistalking me, in 2012. His wikistalking was so flagrant that an uninvolved third party took the issue to WP:ANI.

The WPANI discussion was highly contentious.

Uninvolved third parties wrote that they found his extraordinary focus on my contributions to be questionable. They wrote that it looked like he was particularly targetting me, as part of a personal vendetta.

DBigXray claimed he had no previous interaction with me.

I provided some diffs to show his claim he had no previous interaction with me was completely false.

In response, he retired that ID, for a year or more.

Are we still under an obligation to try to assume good faith when individuals have been indefinitely blocked for disruptive behaviour?

I am considering arguing for undoing some of the damage he did, while he was wikistalking me. Being able to consult discussions we had on User talk:DBigXray could be helpful, if I end up doing that.

FWIW, I considered the possibility that individual had been employing sockpuppetry.

My first interaction with DBigXray was in a couple of discussion of Template:Kashmir separatist movement -- here and here. Short version - DBigXray tried to claim non-collegial edit summaries constituted a civil discussion, and I explained why controversial or complicated edits had to be explained in the Talk namespace.

When I came across that discussion I found half a dozen individuals who weren't really hiding their bias, their support of India's position in the Kashmir dispute. In the eight years since then several other individuals who shared his views, like Darkness_Shines and Vibhijain, were indefinitely blocked. I did consider the possibility that there was sockpuppetry or meat-puppetry behind that clique. Geo Swan (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: As far as I am aware, that editor has permanently left the project. That editor was not blocked. The extraordinary user_talk deletion was made following review by the oversight team - you can appeal that privately to ArbCom if you feel it needs additional review but I can't discuss the details. As far as any content disputes you may have had with the editor, as they have left I would not expect you to have to come to any compromise with them - if your content edits are contentious you should discuss them at the relevant talk pages with whomever is disagreeing with your improvements. If you think there is current sockpuppetry occurring please open an investigation request at WP:SPI. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 01:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the quick reply.
Appeal the extraordinary deletion of User talk:DBigXray to Arbcom? Hmmm. I'll consider it.
Yes, I am afraid there may be ongoing sockpuppetry. Geo Swan (talk) 02:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes, ArbCom is the only place to raise an oversight deletion appeal that has already gone to the general oversight team. — xaosflux Talk 10:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AjpolinoLuK3
  Jackmcbarn
  Ad OrientemHarejLidLomnMentoz86Oliver PereiraXJaM
  There'sNoTimeTheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


User:Arjoccolenty/schools

Can you please e-mail me the content of this page that was deleted? Once again I promise I won't repost it to Wikipedia. Arjoccolenty (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  Donexaosflux Talk 23:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Request revision delete- very libellous

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhruv_Rathee&oldid=983661085 Should this revision be deleted? 4thfile4thrank (talk) 14:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: at the least it was disruptive vandalism, and has been revdel'd. Thank you for the report. — xaosflux Talk 14:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

@CAPTAIN RAJU: thanks - guess I've moved in to the Wikipedia:Fifteen Year Society! — xaosflux Talk 18:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Can this revision be deleted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alex_de_Campi&oldid=984066295

  Donexaosflux Talk 01:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Mass message question

Hello, I am currently attempting to restart the Newsletter for WikiProject Spaceflight, I have noted this on the Project talk page however I am unsure how many people would actually see these talk page notes. I was wondering if a one time mass message to active members of the WikiProject substituting a note of the revival of the newsletter that I could make in my sandbox for example, would be acceptable or not. I ask this since the Wikipedia page on this appears vague to me on mass messages, Thanks. Terasail[Talk] 22:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

@Terasail: that seems OK, assuming you actual check if people are "active" somehow first and only include those already on the project "active" sheet (which would mean they have opted-in to the project). You will need to build an addressable mailing list first, I've started one for you here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Members/Mailing list. After that is ready, you will need to formulate the message you want to send - then request the mailing at WT:MMS. — xaosflux Talk 23:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: thanks for setting up a mailing list for the project, and getting back to me so quickly. I appreciate it. I will make sure to check who is active, create a message and then request it. Terasail II[Talk] 23:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Timelinesinhistory.com

Why did you move my proposal?

Jroehl (talk) 23:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jroehl: see the top of Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals) - your posting was more of an "announcement" (even though it partially read like an advertisement) - you were not presenting a proposal for something for the English Wikipedia to add or change about the way we do things, which is what VP:PR is about. If you wanted us to take some specific action here, I suggest you work it up at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab) first (for example, "We should add timelinesinhistory.com links on every article"). — xaosflux Talk 01:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

I reposted the message in a format that I hope is more appropriate to the forum it is in.

I am not an expert at these type of things.

I agree with your assessment after further contemplation.

Thanks Jeff Roehl

Jroehl (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

WT:MMS

Hello, I have submitted a request at WT:MMS two days ago and I was just wondering if you know how often the page gets checked by WP:RFP/MMS users? Thanks Terasail[Talk] 17:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Terasail: usually within a few days, if it is still open this weekend, ping me and I'll go take a stab at it. — xaosflux Talk 17:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: Ah, ok, thanks Terasail[Talk] 17:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 1 November 2020

Request for Courtesy Vanishing

@Xaosflux please read below. I would like this account closed as I no longer use this. Please delete any data associated with it too. Thanks Bryce M (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Tornadosurvivor2011: there is no facility to "delete any data associated with it too" - your former contributions that you released under CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL require certain data to be maintained. You may request that your username is changed to something such as "Vanished user 4556414564028974" if you never intend to edit anymore. To request that, please use this form: meta:Special:GlobalRenameRequest. — xaosflux Talk 22:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
If that form says you are not logged in, refresh the page after it loads. — xaosflux Talk 23:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! I already did it using your link. Thanks Bryce M (talk) 00:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Does this edit need to be revision deleted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lalu_Prasad_Yadav&diff=prev&oldid=986737174&diffmode=source#2015%E2%80%93current:_Conviction_in_2_fodder_scam_cases 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: I've removed that revision from the history, thanks for the report. — xaosflux Talk 19:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Does this need to be deleted?

Draft:Materialscientist Absolutely no sign of notability. Wikipedia admins do not get articles unless they are notable. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 15:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: I deleted it as an implausible redirect, in the future you can just use a speedy deletion nomination tag on pages like that. — xaosflux Talk 17:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: Yes, but then this occurred, and I want to know when drafts should be speedied or not. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 18:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
@4thfile4thrank: you'll learn with experience, if it feels right nominated CSD, if not sure, nominate xFD - patrolling admins will normally let you know if it isn't CSD-worthy. — xaosflux Talk 19:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Should this edit be revision-deleeted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jay_Beatty&diff=prev&oldid=987246431&diffmode=source 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 20:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: I don't think that is needed - it seems to be blatant generic vandalism, and reversion is the primary method to deal with that. If some other admin were to rev-del it as "purely disruptive", I wouldn't complain though. See WP:REVDEL for more details on what it is normally used for (..RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility,..) — xaosflux Talk 21:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: What is the line between revdel and simply revert? This looked like a threat, so I asked. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :?

@4thfile4thrank: they are not either/or things, any bad edit can be reverted - ones that are also egregiously bad may also be revdeled. This is generally admin discretion. I don't think that is a "threat" as there wasn't a claim that the editor was going to cause the negative action. If you feel this is a legitimate threat of harm, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Responding to threats of harm and a foundation employee will review the report. Another way to get a review from other admins as to if it should be rev-deled is to report it at #wikipedia-en-revdel connect. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 21:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

licensing

Why are your contributions licensed as non-commercial? Wikipedia prohibits non-free content.4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 13:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: I'm not following you, with the exception of some specific uploads, my contributions are licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL, just like everyone else. Additionally, I also multi-license contribution with additional licenses. Anyone is free to reuse a multi-licensed contribution under any single of the applicable licenses. — xaosflux Talk 14:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
@Xaosflux:

Multi-licensed with Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License version 2.0

Licensing, Disclaimers, etc
Licensing, Disclaimers, etc
Multi-licensed with Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License version 2.0  
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
Minor edits multi-licensed into the public domain
I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions marked as minor edits, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my minor edit contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide.
and/or
All rights released to all minor edits
I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked as minor edits, enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use my minor edit contributions, please check the multi-licensing guide.
4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 14:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
@4thfile4thrank: yes, as I mentioned above, as a content author I can license my contributions any way I want, I can make 100 different license options available for things that I own the copyright to, and so long as these include the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL, they are fine here. — xaosflux Talk 16:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Does this need to be revdelled?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Sears&curid=46758559&diff=988248542&oldid=980610627&diffmode=source 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 00:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

It already was. Please keep in mind, a better and more private way to report revdels is to use #wikipedia-en-revdel connect. — xaosflux Talk 01:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Revdel?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JonTron&curid=50059087&diff=988349155&oldid=987690822&diffmode=source 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 16:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@4thfile4thrank: I'm not somewhere that I can deal with these now, and posting these links on my page isn't really a good way to regularly report such concerns - please use #wikipedia-en-revdel connect for assistance on this and future similar issues. — xaosflux Talk 17:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hello, Please unblock my bot (User:Omar2040Bot) for testing, thank you --Omar2040 (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

@Omar2040: hello, you may request a bot trial at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval - in your request note that your bot account needs to be unblocked and it can get handled all at once. — xaosflux Talk 14:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you --Omar2040 (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Emily W. Murphy

Hi Xaosflux, I'm just letting recent contributors to Emily W. Murphy know that I've dropped the protection level to extended confirmed and added a consensus required restriction. Please see my explanation on the talk page for more information. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

17:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AndrwscAnetodeGoldenRingJzGLinguistAtLargeNehrams2020

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Email

YGM, but you can now diregard it. It was handled in the meanwhile. Sorry :-( —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: no worries, you may always ask! — xaosflux Talk 22:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Was Xaosflux2a created by you?

I want to make sure just in case... I blocked it as an impersonator but I wanted to also ask. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@Oshwah: yup it was me, see: Special:Redirect/logid/113219318. That being said, it was a one-time test and I never plan to use that account so it can stay blocked. — xaosflux Talk 22:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey thanks for letting me know! I'm so sorry that I blocked the account so quickly. When I see an account creation like this, in most cases, it's sock puppetry or impersonation. I've unblocked the account since the log says that it was "sock puppetry". Feel free to re-block it; I do this for all doppelgänger accounts I've created for myself. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
@Oshwah: no worries, thanks for the heads up! — xaosflux Talk 00:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

User Aaa11769

Hello, I want to report a user named "User: Aaa11769" who is constantly tried to vandalize the Guardians of the Galaxy (TV series) page previously and now vandalizing the Spider-Man (2017 TV Series) page with wrong information despite being said many times. Can you please block this user from editing the Spider-Man (2017 TV Series) page?

@NoobMaster01: to report immediate vandalism, please see WP:AIV. — xaosflux Talk 12:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Autumn (Australian band)

I've started the article. Thanks for your comments. Have a better one.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

20:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Shoot...I didn't realize I had put the timestamp in the card itself! I tested it in my sandbox, really I did. So. Please tell me what I did wrong at User:Shearonink/Holiday. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
@Shearonink: I made some edits, try sending it to just me again below (just edit this page and add that one line to subst it in). — xaosflux Talk 20:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Xaosflux Wow, a lot of changes but, ok yeah I'll try. am going through all your edits and trying to understand lol. Sadly I am kind of a toddler on these things "me *do*!" and I do it and then I usually kind of understand...So there it is below and it works on your page but...ummm...what is going on at the page User:Shearonink/Holiday? Why does it have your user name there, on the page itself? Please just tell me how to fix it, heh it's ok if you explain it like you would to a child. One who doesn't understand html. Very much at all... Shearonink (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
@Shearonink: I put extra "magic" in it, but also made some errors along the way. You can make it refresh that 'last user' field on your own page by editing the page and saving it. (e.g. add some white space in the categories or something else in the noinclude section). Feel free to experiment and change however you want of course! — xaosflux Talk 22:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

(Sent: 21:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC))

ArbCom SecurePoll page

What is Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Coordination/SecurePoll/formated/4 and why does it contain a link to a locally blocked and globally locked account? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: it was one of the initial reviews of the electoral rolls for the arbcom elections this year, a draft of "eligible voters"; keep in mind this list did not include the eligibility requirement to not be blocked/locked as that element was only necessary at the instant someone voted - 2 other technical controls checked for this. All voter vote records (but not vote choices) are public, you can verify that this editor (or any other inelligible editor) did not actually get a vote counted by viewing this list. — xaosflux Talk 15:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Clear, thanks.  Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


Deleted articles

Hey xaosflux. Here are the links to the articles that were deleted. I can assure you that there were no copyright issues since I was the owner and founder of those record labels and that band.

Would the edit log/changes be something you'd send me via email? Otherwise, how would I see them on here? --AbridgedPause (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

re on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 21:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much!!!! I really appreciate it.--AbridgedPause (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm really sorry to trouble you with this again but after going through the batch of logs that you sent me, I was able to find a few more pages related to my research; all of which I had created around the same time and were deleted for non-notability. Virkelig Død, Virkelix and Vision Éternel (the 2010-deleted version, I don't need the 2018 version). Would I be able to receive the edit logs for those as well please? I hope that I am not imposing on you. --AbridgedPause (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  Doing...xaosflux Talk 17:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  Done See your email. — xaosflux Talk 17:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much once again! --AbridgedPause (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

(Sent: 04:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC))

InTheNews

Hi, Xaoflux, I've a suggestion for the main page, the Portrait of a Young Man holding a Medallion by Sandro Botticelli will be put on auction at Sotheby's in January 2021, but do not really know where and how to bring it in the discussion adequately. Then also, there is the question if or when to include it in the main page, or as the POTD. If the painting achieves a good price at the auction, it would be probably news worthy, if not, it would still be worth for a POTD, but then when ever someone wants. I've worked quite a bit on the article and a lot of the info which was to be found is currently included in the article. The article is more informative than the Portrait of a Man (Baldung), the POTD of the 25 November 2020. About the notability of each painting, opinions might differ. I've not had a suggestion for content at the Main Page yet and I'd be grateful for some advice how to proceed.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle: hello! I don't do a lot of "content" updates to the Main Page, but there are several avenues to getting content to the main page:
  • For POTD, the entry to MP is about the actual image, not the article about the image. To qualify, first the image would need to be considered a Featured Picture (Wikipedia:Featured pictures). At that point you could ask over at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day for how to schedule a FP on a special date related to a special event about the picture. This will be one of the "harder" ways to get to the MP.
  • To be the Featured Article, first your article would need to meet the Wikipedia:Featured articles requirements, then it can be scheduled. This is a "hard" way to get on the MP as well.
  • If there is something newsworthy going on and we have an up to date article about it, a nomination can be placed at WP:ITNC to have a listing in the "In the News" section of the MP. This can not be done until the newsworthy event has actually occurred. If it is a slow news week, this can be an easier way to get on the MP.
  • If something interesting happens and an article is updated to include it, it could get to the main page via Wikipedia:Did you know. This has less prominence, but is also one of the easier ways to get to the MP as there is a lot of content that cycles through this page.
Keep in mind, with the sheer size of the project being the displayed featured article or featured picture is quite rare - but that doesn't mean your article can't still be excellent! If you think your article is well developed one of the first "big" recognition's it would usually get is "GA" (Wikipedia:Good articles). This is usually the path taken along the way to becoming a featured article and would be a place you could start having your article reviewed now. I hope all this helps, happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 01:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, xaosflux, well the painting is thought to achieve a new record for a Sandro Botticelli of who very few paintings are on the market. I guess I wait for the auction and see how the news are then. To get a GA, the article still needs some info, I'll see what I can add.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello, Xaosflux! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Elio Deejay's article!

Hello! I have created an article for Elio Deejay can i ask you to review also suggest me to make it better? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xhoel.m (talkcontribs) 19:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

I don't normally review articles of that topic, please follow the directions on the submission template for the next steps in the standard process. — xaosflux Talk 20:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Can you lend a linguistic hand

It looks like this editor may have some English-language-comprehension issues or possibly some other issues that get in the way of him being productive editor. I see you have edited on the Indonesian-language Wikipedia.

If you speak the language, could you try to figure out if his issues are simply language-related or if it's something else, or maybe he's just this. I can't tell which. I'm hoping it's just a language issue, that might be something that can be worked around. The other two possibilities, well, not so much. I'm not optimistic but I'm hoping I'm wrong. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Davidwr: sorry, I'm id-0, my only edits there are purely technical in nature. — xaosflux Talk 20:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding userpage protection.

I request you to semi-protect my userpage. Vimlesh Kumar Kanaujiya (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Trinity112233:, your base userpage (User:Trinity112233) is automatically semiprotected (everyone's is) - see Wikipedia:UPROT for details. — xaosflux Talk 14:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

My project for my people

I can't say say much to you, however, thank you so much for keeping this certificate for the future. Thanks again. Hope you have a great day's every day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:D08:2187:8BB2:1:0:8D15:E15B (talk) 08:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

happy bday wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teh iiCuppyx (talkcontribs) 14:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment, and at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on "Wikipedia proposals" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Huggle note

Sorry about the groups I added. Yes I was having trouble getting Huggle to recognize that my account had rollback privileges. I can't do 2FA so I've never enabled it. I'll go see if someone at the Huggle page can help. I'll take myself out of those extra groups. Thanks for the heads-up. Cheers, Mark Ironie (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mark Ironie: if you are using the API logon for Huggle see Wikipedia:Using AWB with 2FA and mw:Manual:Huggle/Bot passwords. — xaosflux Talk 20:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I've got it solved now. Cheers, Mark Ironie (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

He Is Amazing!

he is amazing--99.89.93.51 (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Template talk:No article text

Posted an edit request on Template talk:No article text, could you please have a look? 54nd60x (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

It is queued and the backlog is low (Category:Wikipedia fully-protected edit requests) someone will get to it soon. — xaosflux Talk 14:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


Help required with an IP hopping vandal

Hi, I'm an active editor of martial arts articles and I have for last month or two had a problem with this IP hopping vandal. This IP hopping vandal in question makes these damaging/non-constructive edits but removing info and adding nonsense, such as unverifiable names on notable practitioners section, editing birthdates, breaking links and adding stuff like "art must be practised with ska-music" and such. Noticed him first on the Tang Soo Do entry, where this vandal whose IP often begins with 260x-something - and upon looking at history, these vandalisms from these IPs have been going on for two years.

I've notified this to User:WereSpielChequers on 10 January 2021. While WereSpielChequers configured pending changes settings for Tang Soo Do, it turns out that the vandal in question also targets other martial arts entries. Recently, he added nonsense like "It’s practioners include doormen, priests and teachers" to the Shotokan entry and "eats a lot of cheese" to the Jeet Kune Do entry. Also it appears that this specific vandal has been going crazy at the 10th Planet Jujutsu for well over a decade.

Basically these are few IPs I've caught the vandal using:

  • 2600:387:1:803:0:0:0:3B
  • 2601:543:4003:6D60:5464:D40C:5EB6:62FC
  • 2601:547:180:4EC0:8483:B28C:1787:455E
  • 2601:147:C000:1705:92D:6CC6:B07:7D8E
  • 2603:6080:2A40:16B:70BF:1876:BFAA:A801
  • 2603:6080:2a40:16b:4c85:7fa1:cc92:e7ff
  • 2806:101e:9:15e7:adf2:5ebe:2e73:9429
  • 64.134.239.88
  • 64.134.234.157
  • 66.191.229.239
  • 73.229.62.19
  • 74.94.200.49
  • 88.111.226.195
  • 45.251.49.143
  • 114.75.70.166
  • 203.177.105.119
  • 99.145.102.42
  • 90.240.183.67
  • 24.130.130.74
  • 95.144.192.43
  • 103.78.50.250
  • 81.12.120.188

And there are probably others. Only real user name I've seen the vandal use is User:Babak.tangsoodo, seemingly wanting to bypass the pending changes setting for the Tang Soo Do entry. Those starting with 64 or 66 are what he used for 10th Planet Jujutsu and the 260x ones are in Tang Soo So. Others I speculate are achieved via VPN.

Mainly targets Tang Soo Do and 10th Planet Jujutsu, but has also targeted Taekwondo, Shotokan, Jeet Kune Do, Garry O'Neill, Jun Hyeog Lee and possible others.

I notified about this to User:Barek, but the person appears to be out. I checked the "Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to make range blocks" and found your name on it. I'm not sure if range block is the right option per se, but I still hope you could provide some preliminary help this matter. TrickShotFinn (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@TrickShotFinn: hi there, looks like you have a lot of information. I can't jump on this wholesale problem right now but can point you in some directions for next steps.
  • First, range-block isn't going to fix this as you suggested. Range bock is if a group of IP's are related (like. 88.111.226.190, 88.111.226.192, 88.111.226.201, etc) where we block all of the ips in a row (e.g. 88.111.226.128 through 88.111.226.255) even if some of them haven't been seen. OK so what then right?
  • If the same type of vandalism is happening on all of the articles an edit filter may work, you can request one at WP:EF/REQ. This is useful for example if the same phrase is being put in by an ip hoping vandal in to many pages. Provide examples of the articles and diff's with the phrase for EF/REQ.
  • If there are multiple accounts being used you can request a sock puppet investigation at WP:SPI (you can use this for one user and many ip's as well -- it can result in banning the user but won't really fix the ip problem)
  • Finally, as you've seen page protection can be used if the disruption is limited to a few pages - you can request those at WP:RFPP
Hope that helps you get the resources you need to move forward? — xaosflux Talk 12:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, OK. 'the stuff came pretty front-loaded, sorry. I figure requesting for page protection - granted the weirdo starts to get too aggressive with vandalism again - would be the best option then. The vandal uses new IP address per every new act of vandalism, so I figure socket puppet investigation won't be effective enough. And the vandal's acts are often pretty easily reverted, so I guess I went bit overboard here. Anyway, thank you for providing some useful info. TrickShotFinn (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
@TrickShotFinn: best luck on this - keep in mind if they are inserting the same disruptive text, edit filter may be the best and a new phrase could be added to an existing filter. — xaosflux Talk 15:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Ryan (restaurateur)

 

Hello, Xaosflux. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Ryan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

User rights groups

Hi Xaosflux, You may recall assisting in making me vanish in 2018, then un-vanish me when it became clear that I'd misunderstood what it actually involved. I retired from editing for quite a while but more recently, due to the Covid lockdown, I've been spending some of my spare time editing images and wotnot. It's come to my attention that there's an error in my user rights groups. Namely, that I'm not even an autoconfirmed user despite almost 8000 edits over nearly 12 years. Please could you take a look at my account and fully reverse any remnants of my vanishing? Cheers. nagualdesign 05:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Nagualdesign: your account was showing as autoconfirmed, but not extendedconfirmed. I manually updated that for you, this should reenable you to edit articles such as Coronavirus. If you need access to other specialty permissions you can request them at WP:PERM. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 11:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Much obliged. All the best, nagualdesign 13:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6th, 2021 -

February 6th, 11am-1pm E.S.T: Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE
 

Hello User:Xaosflux! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 3rd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - Saturday, Feb 6th, 2021 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how information on wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19.

We'd love to hear if you have any ideas. If you can not attend, please feel free to comment on my talk page, or here, or on the event page.

11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 21:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

History of Rajasthan

user:History of Rajasthan just attempted to make a threat of violence according to the filter log. CLCStudent (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

@CLCStudent: dealing with, thank you for letting us know. — xaosflux Talk 15:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
No problem. WP:EMERGENCY has been notified. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. — xaosflux Talk 15:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)