Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (October 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi MurielMary,
Thanks for reviewing my submission. I added the Cuthbert Yerex page via the list on the Women in Red list of red links (assuming that all the people on that list had been selected as sufficiently notable). The sources that I found for the page seemed to be all the ones that are available, unless I missed something. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (October 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 16:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I have no idea what the two articles say, because I do not have access to JStor or ProQuest. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi - if you're still interested in pursuing this, you might be able to get those sources through the resource exchange here on Wikipedia. The Wikipedia Library grants access to both JSTOR and ProQuest (you're not yet eligible to sign up for the library, but many other folks here are part of it and they can get the information to you via the resource exchange). 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I will try that. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Betsy Whyte moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Betsy Whyte, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Betsy Whyte has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Betsy Whyte. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Dan, could you remove or revise the "This article has multiple issues" box now? I have fixed most of the issues, especially reliance on a single source. Thanks! Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Whyte has been accepted

edit
 
Betsy Whyte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances Elizabeth Herring (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. asilvering (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I thought I had fixed this issue. Could you point out any remaining text that is identical? Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cuthbert Yerex

edit
 

Hello, Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cuthbert Yerex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Axelle Lenoir has been accepted

edit
 
Axelle Lenoir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arianna Gleason (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello. Your recent edits to List of Sikhs, List of people from Vancouver and List of Canadian Sikhs appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply