March 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sharhabil Yaqaf, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. skarz (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, please carefully review Wikipedia's policy requiring the use of reliable sources: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Information involving historical mosques, for example, should be based on reputable publications written by academic historians and archeologists, not news websites, magazines, or other web sources. R Prazeres (talk) 14:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
It is extremely unfair that the edit to Al Najashi Mosque was reverted, honestly. The previous sources weren't much different, and there were sources with stronger evidence to support the claims. Couldn't you at least just remove the questionable sources and just put "citation needed" to the new content?? Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's not unfair at all, this is an encyclopedia that everybody can read and the expectation is that articles should always be improving and becoming more reliable, not less. It's better to inform you of these issues as soon as possible, rather than let you make edits that are likely be reverted or tagged at a later time. There is no reason to add new content only to then tag it as unsourced; we generally only do that to old content sometimes to give someone the chance to fix it if possible (and if it doesn't get fixed, it gets removed eventually).
If you want to add content about the mosque's recent history which can be verified through relevant news sources, that's fine, but its origins and older history need scholarly sources, as this is the domain of professional historians and archeologists. R Prazeres (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mashhad al-Tabataba has been accepted

edit
 
Mashhad al-Tabataba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBritinator (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright, thank you for letting me know. Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 08:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Hamra Mosque (Kufa) has been accepted

edit
 
Al-Hamra Mosque (Kufa), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, thank you! Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amr ibn al-As Mosque (Damietta) has been accepted

edit
 
Amr ibn al-As Mosque (Damietta), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 05:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishr al-Marisi (March 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidi Zouk Tomb has been accepted

edit
 
Sidi Zouk Tomb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmud Shukri al-Alusi (March 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaykh Rajab Mosque (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Imaginary history of Egypt moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Imaginary history of Egypt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad Bahjat Athari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Quduri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sumyafa Ashwa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greek and Syriac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aksumite–Persian wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:YEMEN

edit

Abo Yemen 09:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ibn Dawud. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.TheEagle107 (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Yusuf Asar Yathar I also came to your talk page following couple of your edits. It's quite interesting that you are taking so much effort and still so many messages coming your way, but that is the way we all have learned here and I hope and request to take all these messages in good spirit and try to read as many help page links suggested by various users.
And it's okay to reduce speed a little since searching for best possible quality academic sources and writing in own words and navigating through so many policies is time consuming process for any new user. You need to write in own words but write what the source is saying and not any thing beyond the source says. I hope you are taking care on this point.
I suggest using academic professors of relevant subjects from https://scholar.google.com/ and https://books.google.com/ as much as possible so you will face less number of questions on reliability from other Wikipedia users.
In case of any question feel free to contact WP:Teahouse or drop me a line. Happy editing Bookku (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Bookku: This user considers the Muslim scholars who criticized the Wahhabi movement, such as: Ibn Dawud and Ibn Fayruz (By the way, these two articles were created by him) are infidels/atheists, without any sources at all, only from his own mind!TheEagle107 (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Yusuf Asar Yathar requesting awaiting your response. Bookku (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I mean some scholars (not me) did call them atheists. I was just following those, and in case you think I'm a Wahhabi fanatic no I'm not one, I'm an Ash'ari. Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • First thing first ".. I mean some scholars (not me) did call them atheists. .." This much answer is sufficient. In Wikipedia are you following Wikipedia policies and guidelines is important, what is your personal background is not. You can seek to preserve your privacy and not being discriminated against on the basis of your background.
  • 'Some scholars' is vague, naming which or who is important
    • Wikipedia has nuanced guidelines where you can or can not use Wikipedia voice and where In-text attribution are essential. WP:INTEXT provides you interesting examples. But until you get nuanced expertise always state Which scholar/ author said what.
    • Scholars can be of more types religious scholars and academic university professor / scholars of Islamic studies / religious studies / cultural and anthropological studies. Even if you wish to quote a religious scholar let that reference come from reference of academic university professor / scholar.
  • Also try to get acquaint concepts of majority view among academics need to be given primacy, minority views are dealt as per WP:Fringe guidelines.
  • Then you get grasp of WP:BLP and MOS:BLP guidelines if you are writing about living person. and MOS:ISLAM while writing on Islamic topics.
  • Wikipedia has various notice boards like WP:RSN to ask doubts and seek inputs use them too as much as possible.
Last but not least Wikipedia has many policies and guidelines, writing and defending one one sentence can be skill and challenge, don't get overwhelmed every one goes through these learning steps. Read and follow as many as possible, if some one points out any mistake study related policy and be willing to make corrections as needed. All the best happy editing. Bookku (talk) 03:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Mausoleum of Talha ibn 'Ubayd Allah: "but in 2006 the mosque building was destroyed with explosives by Shi'ite gunmen in an act of revenge for the 2006 al-Askari mosque bombing." Sources say 'Unkown gunmen' not 'Shi'ite gunmen'.
  • Abu al-Abbas al-Nahawandi: "He opposed the Ash'ari school and their founder, Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari. He even excommunicated them, and made a claim that a thousand scholars opposed the Ash'aris." The cited sources are not considered reliable. However, I did not find this statement in the sources as well. Please WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE. Thank you.--TheEagle107 (talk) 11:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ibn Dawud, you may be blocked from editing. TheEagle107 (talk) 10:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar

Your recent contribution to Wikipedia, on the topic Amr ibn Luhay has been fabulous and amazing. Keep up the good work. Hamza A. Durrani (talk) 06:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ubayd bin Sharia

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from ar.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Thank you for your efforts and contributions! Take care.

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Yusuf Asar Yathar. Thank you for your work on Sheikh Ma'ruf Cemetery. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharhabil Yakkuf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Hamdani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tafsiri Raman moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Tafsiri Raman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page is still there as the sources have been added Yusuf Asar Yathar (talk) 03:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tafsir works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bishr al-Marisi

edit

  Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bishr al-Marisi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Imaginary history of Egypt

edit

  Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imaginary history of Egypt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amr ibn Luhay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bukhari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Al Bu Sa'ad

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Al Bu Sa'ad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khaled bin Sinan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Avian, Algerian and Ishmaelite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bishr al-Marisi

edit
 

Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bishr al-Marisi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Al-Baghdadiyun, Akhbaruhum Wa Majalisuhum for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Baghdadiyun, Akhbaruhum Wa Majalisuhum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Baghdadiyun, Akhbaruhum Wa Majalisuhum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 23:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Tafsiri Raman

edit

  Hello, Yusuf Asar Yathar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tafsiri Raman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab Al Faihani

edit

Assalamualaikum. Many thanks for creating an article of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab Al Faihani. Anyaway, since there is a unique fact on his photo often falsely attributes to Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, it is better for you to submit it to Did You Know (DYK). Faldi00 (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply