Yyyyyyyyyyy

Welcome!

Hello, Yyyyyyyyyyy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

BSG Episodes

Let's list them by season/episode instead of year. For instance 101|33 (Battlestar Galactica) for the premeire. It seems like a better idea to me --ZachPruckowski 00:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok, my mistake. I'll change back the ones I started. But it may be better to have two categories, since they're totally different series. But whatever you want to do. Also, you accidentally wrote that on my user page instead of my talk page (I moved it) --ZachPruckowski 00:50, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. I'll change the rest of them tonight to year production# title, it looks we've got about 8 like that, and the rest just by year. I'll do it in a few hours, let me know if that doesn't work. --ZachPruckowski 00:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

After a discussion with an admin (the one who reverted the category back to straight alphabetical order), we decided that in conformance with Wikipedia standards and conventions, we ought to have two categories arranged alphabetically. I'll be making that change sometime later today. If you have comments or concerns or questions, you know where to find me. :) --ZachPruckowski 18:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Full Colors vs. Pyramid

(there is no proof that the new game is played the same way as the old one)

There is NO PROOF it isn't either, your basing everything off your own conjecture which violates Neutral Point of View rules. Cyberia23 23:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

(from another page's conversation) How does it violate POV? We have no proof that Full Colors and Pyramid are the same. Therefore combining the two and saying that they *are* the same is a POV violation. Keeping them separate allows them to be whatever they are. When they are proved same, they can be merged then. Yyyyyyyyyyy 02:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Y, you are making a fallacious argument that by NOT seeing anything confirming them to be the same that they are not the same. Cyberia23 and I are both in the right here. The ONLY thing that we KNOW about this from the screen is that they use the same deck of cards. Off-screen we have RDM's admission that they ARE the same thing and the name issue was his fault. There is plenty of evidence and rationale for a single article and NONE for two different ones. (Even when you DO pull it into two, the second one is less than meager.)

VigilancePrime 06:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox animanga/Dorama

I've moved this component of the Animanga infobox to Template:Infobox animanga/Drama in order to avoid confusion. In general, foreign terms should not be used in place of an English equivalent unless the foreign term is also in common use among English speakers. --TheFarix (Talk) 18:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Dorama v Drama

But Dorama is fairly widely used in English. The Dorama Encyclopedia : A Guide to Japanese TV Drama Since 1953 (Amazon.com) for example. - Yyyyyyyyyyy 13:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't think one book title is evidence of "wide use" among the general English speaking/reading population. Besides, "dorama" appears to be a Japanese phonetic corruption of "drama" to start with. So why not use the term that English speakers already know and understand? --TheFarix (Talk) 17:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Sasha

• You recently moved the article on Sasha the DJ to a new location and replaced it with a disambiguation page. This has broken approximately 100 links or so. I hope you plan on helping clean up all the links that now link to the new disambiguation page. Thanks. Wickethewok 05:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Notification of page deletion

I have nominated the following page for deletion after merging them into a simpler Ghost in the Shell (disambiguation).

• Ghost in the Shell (manga) (disambiguation)
• Ghost in the Shell (anime)
• Ghost in the Shell (anime film)
• Ghost in the Shell (TV anime)

Discuss at WP:SD#Ghost in the Shell disambiguation pages --70.111.249.132 19:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Fiction by work

Are you the creator of this category, and if so, what does this term mean?? thanks - ♥ Her Pegship♥ 17:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sigma Draconis (Honorverse)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sigma Draconis (Honorverse), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 03:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Macross and Robotech characters

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Macross and Robotech characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Macross and Robotech characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Macross and Robotech characters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Star Trek regions of space

I have nominated Category:Star Trek regions of space (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Ball_sport_(Battlestar_Galactica) maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball_sport_(Battlestar_Galactica).

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
   
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
   Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
   Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
4. You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Colonial Forces (Battlestar Galactica)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Colonial Forces (Battlestar Galactica), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of or evidence of notability; lacks citations to reliable sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --EEMIV (talk) 03:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Battlestar Galactica objects

I have nominated Category:Battlestar Galactica objects (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Law in fiction by works

I have nominated Category:Law in fiction by works (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Law in fiction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Fiction by topic

I have nominated Category:Fiction by topic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Topics in popular culture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fences&Windows 15:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Literary fiction has been nominated for discussion

Category:Literary fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 02:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ila (Battlestar Galactica)

The article Ila (Battlestar Galactica) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zac (Battlestar Galactica)

The article Zac (Battlestar Galactica) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of alien species in the Honorverse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of alien species in the Honorverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alien species in the Honorverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 21:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Colonial Raptor

The article Colonial Raptor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Battlestar Galactica locations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Battlestar Galactica locations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 14:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Adar

The article Richard Adar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Historical fiction has been nominated for renaming

Category:Historical fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Family saga has been nominated for merging

Category:Family saga has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:History in fiction has been nominated for renaming

Category:History in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Military in fiction has been nominated for merging

Category:Military in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Science in fiction has been nominated for merging

Category:Science in fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Zack (Battlestar Galactica) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zack (Battlestar Galactica) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack (Battlestar Galactica) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:After War Gundam X images

A tag has been placed on Category:After War Gundam X images indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Fictional works has been nominated for renaming

Category:Fictional works has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)