Welcome!

edit

Hello, Z3C2X1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vyjayanthimala did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  - SUN EYE 1 15:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Wesoree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scarlet macaw have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wesoree (Talk) 19:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! I'm Iloveparrots. Your recent edit(s) to the page Scarlet macaw appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iloveparrots (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Glaucous macaw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to List of Japanese supercentenarians, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:19, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Namrata Shirodkar, you may be blocked from editing. Geniac (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shilpa Shirodkar. Geniac (talk) 01:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Geniac (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Juhi Chawla. - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 20:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply