User talk:Zanglazor/Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joshua Freedman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to EQ, COO, O Magazine and Workplace

Amir Gross Kabiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to English, Israeli and Russian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anabel Jensen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to EQ

Joseph Csaky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Expositions universelles de Paris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

+Beryll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Austrian, Private, Maxfield and Accessories

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claudia Romani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mega TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sigmar Berg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Nice work on the Leonid Poretsky Page!

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maxthon

Template:Maxthon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Antonio Pio Saracino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *2007: ''New Generation of European Art'' ([useum of Contemporary Art, La Centrale Electrique in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Antonio Pio Saracino

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Antonio Pio Saracino, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://antoniopiosaracino.com/about-aps/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Antonio Pio Saracino and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Antonio Pio Saracino, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Antonio Pio Saracino with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Antonio Pio Saracino. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Antonio Pio Saracino saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SERGIO aka the Black Cat 09:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Pio Saracino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antonio Pio Saracino, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyvio

Can you re-write the article in its entirety? I know that you say that it's released into the commons, but it's highly recommended that when writing an article that you re-write it in your own words. In most situations it's because even if all rights to the content is given up as fair use, the text will likely still contain peacock phrases that would set off concerns of promotion. Using Saracino's own text also brings up concerns of self-promotion because it's something he wrote as opposed to being something that was written by a non-COI editor. Leaving it as it is now, I can guarantee that the page will be repeatedly dinged for copyvio even if this is registered as fair use. It's the easiest way to solve the issue on the page in general. Other than that, the tone is also fairly casual for an encyclopedic entry. I would really recommend re-writing it. I can't stress enough how much easier it would make everything in general and it would keep people from continuously tagging the page for deletion in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

• I've moved it to your userspace at User:Zanglazor/Antonio Pio Saracino so you can work on re-writing it. The thing about the fair use rationale when it comes to text is that you're still expected to re-write the content for Wikipedia. Not only would there be issues with people assuming it's promotional, worrying about peacock prose, and showing concern that Saracino is essentially controlling what is on the page, but a few have also expressed concern that at some point in the future the original author of the work might try to claim ownership of the writing in some form or fashion. Basically put, Saracino might be upset that it doesn't sound good enough or wants to change it, then tries to yank it from the page. We've had people do similar-ish stuff in the past. I also have to be blunt and say that most of the concern would be over promotion. I know I sound like a broken record, but I can't stress how much this can negatively affect your editing reputation on Wikipedia. The last thing you want is for someone to automatically assume that you're a paid editor or that you're doing copyvio or any number of concerns. The easiest way to avoid all of this is to just re-write it. It's annoying, I know, but it's just the easiest way around everything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
• If you want, I don't mind helping with the re-write. I'll be going to class very shortly so I can't do it right now but I don't mind helping to clean it up. I figure if I'm going to ask you to do a complete re-write of a rather large article, the least I can do is offer to help. Offhand, the only sections that will need to be re-written will be the first three sections. The works section will understandably have information in it that will always be substantially similar to anything he posts anywhere. I just don't want this to be deleted outright, is all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, thank you for being so helpful, even if it was deleted; your explanations all make sense. I will work on the larger version, making sure to reword more carefully. Not sure if you can help on this, but I did post a much smaller version on the old talk page, where I was very careful to reword things and use independent sources where possible - until the big one gets ironed out, do you think that could be found, perhaps popped live as a placeholder? I think it might be deleted already, though, let me look. Zanglazor (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

• It probably could- as long as it's neutrally written we can use it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

• I think that this is what you're referring to. It looks to be OK for the most part, so I'd say it could serve as a good place holder for the time being. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
• I've moved that into the mainspace to serve as placeholder for the time being. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
• I've also left a note on the talk page asking for anyone coming in to show some clemency while we work on things. I can't guarantee that they'll do that, but most will give us the time we need. I've also added the works section into the article since that won't really count as copyvio. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Couldn't find but no biggie, I will just work on the big one. I have to take my friend to the dentist soon, but after that will spend some time in the sandbox. Thank you for your offer to help edit: of course you are very welcome to (maybe it is a topic that interests you), and editing with other people is always better in the end! I like to edit, though, so I don't mind working on it myself. If you are busy like it sounds, perhaps I could ask to use your time as a reviewer, before there are any attempts to put it on the real page again? I would so very much appreciate that :) I doubt it would take too long. Zanglazor (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Woah, just read your note, you are the most helpful Wikpedian ever! thank you Zanglazor (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Cleaned it up

I've cleaned it up and pasted it into the mainspace. We can always continue to add and flesh it out, but the hardest part (the re-write) is done. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for being flexible about the article for Antonio Pio Saracino! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks for the unicorn! It made me blush! :) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)