What does the article (or section) do well? I thought you did a good job of defining key terms which lays a good groundwork to build off. You also had a list of good sources.
What changes would you suggest overall? I would recommend that you add any information that has currently been done on music therapy and then also discuss more specifically about what kind of brain diseases this treatment would be used for. I think it would also be helpful to include more about the scientific aspect of the therapy and talk about how exactly it can or can't help. I would recommend researching about the successfulness of cognitive music therapy. Are there any negative side effects to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyu331 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Discuss more in detail about the scientific reasoning of why music therapy works and back it up with current research studies that have been done on it.