Zoë2000

July 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Zoë2000, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zoë2000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Incest between twins. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Boys (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 00:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boys (TV series). Meters (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Boys (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boys (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meters (talk) 05:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 22:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 22:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 22:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Zayn Malik. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoë2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Am I allowed to upload files to my userspace? Zoë2000 (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm allowed to have 29 August 2017 recent pics of Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson on Liam Payne's 24th birthday on their userspace article on my user page right now in the One Direction category and everything. Twitter. Phoebe's.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIYGGXRW0AAb8oP.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIYGIe3W4AAJWrJ.jpg

The Catcher in the Rye's little sister's name is so much better than the middle name of Daisy Hilton! I think White people put the right handed twin first before the left handed twin! Phoebe is the left handed twin and Daisy is the right handed man! --Zoë2000 (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Unblock me right now you & I are playing with white people and touching Phoebe! Revert 1D to Family musical groups, but not twins?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoë2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I agree, One Direction is not in Twin musicians, but I miss them in Family musical groups, why I have to edit One Direction right now! I need "be able" to "elaborate" more on that, on what a second cousin is, or a cousin at all, in there, too, and I also miss their X Factor performances chart! And that Zayn has to win against Cher Lloyd! I think you were 15 minutes of fame where I talked about reality show contestants One Direction's 15 minutes of fame and that they need YouTubers Evelyn & Titi the exact same twins as Daisy Violet Hilton, Louis's two twins! Reality show and YouTube? Then they are a userspace page in mine! Can you go on the category for One Direction and find them and me more? We are still promoting me, right? We are still "shameless self-promotion" and Creative Arts Agency! I am not going to beat them to it! I think that's Diana DeGarmo not me! Adele gonna make it better for you! That wasn't me in the first place and you were that's not me! I'm still working on Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson anyway, it's just done, that's all, at least, until tomorrow, like my blog on LiveJournal is! Zoë2000 (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Respectfully, this is almost incoherent. It does not seem to address the reason for your block in any way. Kuru (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 15 minutes of fame, you may be blocked from editing. Back from a block with more of the same gibberish. Meters (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Just 15 minutes of fame, right? And not One Direction, right? --Zoë2000 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at One Direction. Meters (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I think it's Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson that you don't want! Image caption- Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson on 29 August 2017, Daisy likes denim blue jean jackets for the letter D in Daisy and is right handed and Phoebe likes purple peplum rompers for the letter P in Phoebe and is left handed. --Zoë2000 (talk) 20:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You have now been blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia requires a level of competency you have failed to demonstrate here. You are deliberately engaging in edit wars and your actions here have served to actively harm Wikipedia articles. Any further evidence of this here on this talk page and I'll revoke your access to this page, too. --Yamla (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I think it's only for a day. Twitter pics are share-alike and by larry stylinson. --Zoë2000 (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Zoë2000/Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson

User:Zoë2000/Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zoë2000/Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Zoë2000/Daisy and Phoebe Tomlinson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Block evasion

User has engaged in block evasion here. --Yamla (talk) 22:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

User has engaged in block evasion in March of 2018 as I Have Always Been a Twin (talk · contribs) and via an IP address. --Yamla (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)