Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/3SeriesBOT
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Request Expired.
Operator: Bwilkins (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:42, Friday November 5, 2010 (UTC)
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: (to come)
Function overview: to properly qualify categories
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): AN Discussion, Original bot request
Edit period(s): continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: unknown
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y
Already has a bot flag (Y/N):
Function details:
- ===Discussion===
- Comment: This is not being added as a task to User:7SeriesBOT as that bot has an admin flag. This current task has no requirement for that level of access. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A more relevant discussion link is to the bot requests archive, in which I spelled out the actions that I'd like to see taken. Nyttend (talk) 20:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Im creating a list of categories I would like you to review. (Subcats of Category:Buildings and structures in the United States going down two levels) and remove any that you think don't qualify. ΔT The only constant 16:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See User:Δ/Sandbox 2 for a listing of all cats, if there are any that I should delve deeper into let me know, and remove any that shouldn't be there. ΔT The only constant 18:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Im creating a list of categories I would like you to review. (Subcats of Category:Buildings and structures in the United States going down two levels) and remove any that you think don't qualify. ΔT The only constant 16:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Implementation plan of action
- exact requirements finalized on CFD
- code built by beta/delta
- code released for verification by BFRA group, and amended as required
- bot started for short run of test articles
- approval for full run
- modifications/amendments verified by other python coders before implementation
- Any news on the "finalized on CFD" step? - Jarry1250 [Who? Discuss.] 17:24, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any news on the "finalized on CFD" step? Anomie⚔ 03:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bwilkins asked me to comment on CFDs via bot. Unfortunately, I can't help there, as I wasn't aware that such a process was happening or was being planned. Nyttend (talk) 12:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any news on the "finalized on CFD" step? Anomie⚔ 03:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Request Expired. Mr.Z-man 22:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.