Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JCbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

JCbot

Operator: –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Function Overview: The bot will run simple and regex find/replace tasks for Wikipedia:WikiProject Topic outline and any other articles that need it.

Edit period(s): Whenever it's needed, most likely no more than once every few days

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: Various repetitive find/replace tasks for the pages listed here. Mostly minor stuff, such as changing links; an example of this can be seen here.

Discussion

This is my first BRFA, so bear with me, and sorry if I screwed anything up too badly... –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify specific tasks, don't say "It'll do stuff" since there's no way for us or anybody else providing feedback to generate consensus if we don't know what it does. Q ^{T C} 16:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doing... –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You managed to file a BRFA correctly though, so kudos for that. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 16:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Simple, uncontroversial task, but it's best to ensure that there are no gremlins in the code! Richard ⁰⁶¹² 20:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for a while, operator request. No need to expire this brfa. ST47 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any updates? – Quadell ^(talk) 14:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) – Quadell ^(talk) 23:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's best to expire this, as I'm more or less stuck. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. – Quadell ^(talk) 00:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.