Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
    You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

    The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs 0
    RfBs 0
    Overdue RfBs 0
    Overdue RfAs 0
    BRFAs 14
    Approved BRFAs 0
    Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
    No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
    It is 15:42:36 on August 3, 2024, according to the server's time and date.


    "Me getting attacked by a bunch of users" etc.

    Has anyone passed this boring disruption on to the WMF? Is there any point in it? Before the proxying there were IPs and of course CU on the accounts has real information--I don't know if the lawyers and sleuths at the Foundation act on those things. Drmies (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

    See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#So_what_are_we_doing_about_that_IP. I have taken no action here other than blocking some proxies. --Yamla (talk) 21:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I'm not seeing how this is a bureaucrat specific issue; is there something special that is needed from this team? — xaosflux Talk 23:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Xaosflux I think Drmies is asking if the issue can be raised to the WMF. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    The checkuser team (already mentioned) is under the auspices of arbcom, who has recurring meetings with WMF resources; the bureaucrat team has no such thing. So I'd suggest having the CU's escalate to arbcom if they need WMF support. — xaosflux Talk 23:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Maybe Drmies posted here because the vandalism has spread to this board. Graham87 (talk) 07:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I believe that at this point literally every single administrator and functionary has been, forcibly, made aware of this person's ridiculous and ignorant complaint dozens of times, owing to them spending several months making it thousands of times across every conceivable attack surface and every project on which it's possible for them to edit. There are only a couple ways for this to resolve: either they realize that nobody cares and it will never result in their unblock and they give up (extremely unlikely since they've already been told this hundreds of times), they get bored and stop, or we just figure out enough rangeblocks and edit filters that they have to spend two days figuring out a loophole to post their absurd thing and get reverted and blocked within 15 seconds. jp×g🗯️ 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    User:Xaosflux, I posted here because you guys are the highest of the highest and the best of the best, and I was hoping for...well I don't know. CU is really useless anyway; the CU data for the original account are clear and "real", but all these recent ones, it's just proxies. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks for the note, the volunteer teams that will get most attention from WMF resources are Arbcom and the stewards. Our stewards team will block open proxies that are brought to our attention - even if they are 'only disrupting enwiki', and can work with Trust and Safety if there is an overwhelming attack. We do not aggressively block all peer-to-peer proxies, as they are often single nodes on dynamic addresses. There used to be an adminbot here that would block proxies locally, but it stopped doing so back in March (see also Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#ST47ProxyBot). If there is still community support for such, another admin could spin up a replacement if the original operator no longer wants to do this. — xaosflux Talk 15:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply