To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 17:08 on 6 July 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

edit
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

edit

Errors in "Did you know ..."

edit

Way Less Sad

edit

I don’t understand how this song passed DYKINT. One song sampled another. How is this unusual? Zanahary 02:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's ask those who were involved in this: Koopastar (as nominator), Dharmadhyaksha (as reviewer), Hey man im josh (as promoter to prep), and Premeditated Chaos (as promoter to queue). Link to nom page. Schwede66 03:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At WT:DYK#Way Less Sad, I wrote the alternative hook "... that AJR built "Way Less Sad" around a barely audible trumpet riff from Simon & Garfunkel's "My Little Town"?" as it highlights a more unique aspect of the sampling and is mentioned as such in multiple sources. This was supported by User:AirshipJungleman29 but opposed by User:Launchballer, who opted for a reworded version of ALT0 from the original nomination page. Neither of these went through though. Koopastar (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I objected to "barely audible" as factually inaccurate (it's the same riff twice at the end and it's playing at about 50% volume at the end of the first). How are the sources describing it?--Launchballer 05:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the currently sourced article for the DYK (1) and other interviews such as (2), they continuously emphasize that they had to turn up their volume to hear it and the riff being in the fade-out. I agree that it doesn't sound that quiet, but when combined with their phrasing in multiple places, it seems low enough to warrant the label. Koopastar (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From the interview, you could try "... that AJR built "Way Less Sad" around the "last three seconds" of the fade-out of Simon & Garfunkel's "My Little Town"?". You will need to add that to the article, probably as a quote. (I don't expect Simon & Garfunkel to do a Skynyrd's Innyrds and release a non-fade version even though they should, but belt and braces and all that...)--Launchballer 07:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of moving from the approved area to the prep area I just thought the hook was interesting. If others do not, I'll make note of that. I'm new to helping out at DYK so I'll adjust appropriately based on feedback. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpatokal, Hybernator, AirshipJungleman29, and Premeditated Chaos: Hook is sourced to two travel websites with no editorial control? I wouldn't think those are reliable sources... theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't realize they were user-generated. I think I misunderstood what Leek was saying was wrong, I should really not comment without coffee. ♠PMC(talk) 12:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? HPRC is the Hiroshima Prefecture Roads Public Corporation, the government-owned entity which operates the road and just about the most reliable source you could get. Jpatokal (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One of them is a reliable government website. I'm not convinced that the second website has no editorial control with such a big corporation behind it. Also take a look at this journal article. There is other significant coverage as well. SL93 (talk) 09:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jpatokal, it would help most readers if you could add translated titles |trans-title= to references and translate website names. TSventon (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "On this day"

edit
edit
(July 12)
(July 8)
edit

Any other Main Page errors

edit

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.