Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Augustinian theodicy/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 18:13, 20 September 2012 [1].
Augustinian theodicy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article candidates/Augustinian theodicy/archive1
- Featured article candidates/Augustinian theodicy/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been working on this article on an off for almost a year, and believe that it is finally ready to be listed as a Featured Article. It was failed a nomination in April; since then, I have improved the article, dealing with the criticisms from the last FAC as well as making further improvements with the content, sourcing, and prose. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion with Staszek Lem moved to article talk page. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Addressed comments from Crisco 1492 moved to talk
- Support - Looks well written enough, images are fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I supported this at its last nomination, and, having looked through the subsequent changes, I see no reason to rescind my support for this round. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:27, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image Check - all images are OK in public domain (2 PD-old-100, 1 Yorck project, 1 CC 3.0), author- and source-information is provided. GermanJoe (talk) 08:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, with one quick comment: Should sources be small per MOS:ACCESS? TBrandley 05:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done
- Bennet or Bennett?
- FN21: italicization
- Little is missing date
- No citations to McGrath 1999. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.