Wikipedia:Featured article review/Torajan people/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: User talk:Indon, User talk:Outriggr (2006-2009), WikiProject Indonesia, WikiProject Ethnic groups, WikiProject Death, 31 Dec
Review section
editI am nominating this featured article for review because of verifiability issues and lack of RS, as detailed on the talk page (t · c) buidhe 08:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no edits. (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, no progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC: large swaths of unsourced or poorly sourced text remain. (In addition to the unreliable sources that Buidhe mentioned on the talk page, amazingnotes.com is a blog and incitoprima.com is selling tourist excursions.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I see Chainwit. has added some references, although the ruparupa source might be a blog? Hog Farm Talk 15:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a commercial website with no academical reliability. It's not a good ref too. --Chainwit. (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I see Chainwit. has added some references, although the ruparupa source might be a blog? Hog Farm Talk 15:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
edit- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing. DrKay (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- A couple of refs were added, but we're still far from fixing the sourcing problems with this article. (t · c) buidhe 19:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist still has 16 cn tags and other sourcing issues (unreliability) (t · c) buidhe 19:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist while Chainwit. made excellent progress on adding citations, there have been no edits from them since Jan. 25 and concerns still remain. I will strike this vote if Chainwit. returns or someone else steps up to make improvements. Z1720 (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - a long way to go in citation quality and quantity. Hog Farm Talk 02:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.