Wikipedia:Featured article review/Wigwag (railroad)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 14:33, 26 March 2007.
Review commentary
edit- Original nominator no longer active. Message left at Trains and California. LuciferMorgan 23:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My main concern is the lack of references here (WP:FA? 1.c). Only two references are given, and only one of these is inline. The article is tagged as not representing a worldwide view, and hence is not comprehensive (1b). I am also not convinced by the lead section (2a) and the overall quality of the writing (1a). →Ollie (talk • contribs) 13:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Fails 1c. LuciferMorgan 13:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails 1c for even GA status. Needs a huge referencing campaign to maintain FA status. — Deckiller 16:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails 3 Fair use Image:Burlington_Northern_SantaFe_Herald.png does not contribute substantially to the text. Hipocrite - «Talk» 21:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), comprehensiveness (1b), LEAD (2a), prose quality (1a). Marskell 14:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 11:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per my reasoning above. The article has major deficiencies to my mind, and the required work is not forthcoming. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 19:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.