Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Azealia Banks discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Crisco 1492 13:20, 17 April 2015 [1].

Azealia Banks discography

Nominator(s): HĐ (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This list is about the discography of American hip hop artist Azealia Banks. A concise and well-sourced list, it meets all the criteria for a featured list. HĐ (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from FrB.TG

"Broke with Expensive Taste, which attained moderate success". Needs a source even if it is available in the section(s) as it's not mentioned elsewhere other than lead.

Fixed. HĐ (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"yield" does not sound encyclopedic. How about "spawn"? --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 15:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your review! HĐ (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support — FrankBoy _(Buzz) 16:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from SNUGGUMS

Very good so far, here are my comments:

I think simply "American rapper" can be used rather than "American rapper and singer"

Done. HĐ (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on the worldwide sales for Broke with Expensive Taste?

I have found nothing on it. Sorry. HĐ (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In "Guest appearances", remove the period following "II. Earth: The Oldest Computer (The Last Night)"

Done. HĐ (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, a fine list. Well done! Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review! HĐ (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, and I can now support this for FL. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man

"Banks officially adopts the present-day" not grammatically correct, maybe "Banks officially adopted her present stage name..."

done. HĐ (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In general, the lead is a little weak.

To what extend? I don't get this much. HĐ (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The lead does not adequately summarise the whole article. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How does it look now? HĐ (talk) 11:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. I don't think it covers the 19 music videos at all (other than to say she has 19 music videos) and I don't think it covers the ten singles adequately. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which country is each release date relevant to?

done. HĐ (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing the 1,751 sales for her album in the UK in that reference, could you advise?

It clearly reads "subscription required". HĐ (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"including four as a featured artist" in lead, three in the table.

done. HĐ (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ten singles in total in the tables, nine in the lead and infobox.

done. HĐ (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the "other charted songs" in the lead.
And that song "Ice Princess" isn't referenced anywhere.

I don't get this. HĐ (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see it now. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid the SHOUTING in the reference titles.

done. HĐ (talk) 02:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully ~~oppose~~ until the quality of the prose and the content is improved. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I have addressed all of your concerns. HĐ (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not as bad as it was, but the prose is still clunky, repetitive and weak. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Then what should I do to strengthen the lead? Could you suggest some? HĐ (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It just contains a lot of repetition of terms, and odd statements like suggesting her real name is now her stage name. But as you already have support from others, I'm sure it won't be long before it's promoted. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have amended it a bit. Is it better now? HĐ (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man, are you neutral in this, or...? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sticking at neutral. I still don't really like the lead, but I can't really get my head into fixing it myself I'm afraid. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archive, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Unfortunately, not enough of a consensus has been developed to promote this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492: How come? This nomination has got two supports and one neutral. HĐ (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, a minimum of three support !votes is expected by the delegates to judge a list ready for promotion. This has already been open for 2 months and 10 days, with no comments except for TRM's in 2 months and 8 days. This nomination will likely have a better chance if you renominate in a week and start anew. You may find it helpful to review other people's nominations as well, to get interest in your own work. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492: I understand. However, the FLC for Christina Aguilera discography (nominated by me) also attracted two supports and it's promoted. HĐ (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for the delegate who closed that nomination, but perhaps he considered Rufus' comments to be akin to a support !vote. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.