Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Green Bay Packers presidents/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Green Bay Packers presidents

Featured list candidates/List of Green Bay Packers presidents/archive1

Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the culmination of many years of work bringing all the Packers president articles up to WP:GA quality (only missing John Jones and this FLC to round out a featured topic). The Packers have a unique ownership structure unlike any NFL team. They are led by a Board of Directors, with the president being elected and acting as a team owner. In the 100+ year history of the team, there have been 11 of these presidents. Thank you for your time reviewing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Image caption should be "Mark Murphy, the Packers' current president"
"which mandate no more than 25 people can" => "which mandate that no more than 25 people can"
"the Packers ownership structure was grandfathered" => "the Packers' ownership structure was grandfathered"
"They represent the organization on NFL committees [...] and generally appears" - subject changes from plural to singular mid-sentence
"Eight of the eleven presidents have been" => "Eight of the eleven presidents had been"
"prior to their tenure and include" => "prior to their tenure; these include"
"The Packers first president," => "The Packers' first president,"
That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ChrisTheDude, all changes have been made, thanks for your review. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MyCatIsAChonk

after a public offering of stock raised $5,000. - link stock, as I'm not entirely sure what this means; I'd assume company stock, but I'm no sports aficionado
after it was in receivership for a number of years - what number of years?
I feel like the first para of the lead would be better split into two, the first going up until It was later reorganized into its current form, known as the Green Bay Packers, Inc., in 1935 after it was in receivership for a number of years and the second starting with The executive committee, which is elected from the board members, includes three members at-large, a secretary, treasurer, vice president, and president; the first section introduced the subject and details the Packers' history, and the second details the role of the president- your choice to implement, though
The "Refs" column does not need to be divided into multiple cells, since they all use the same citation; see the Emmys section of List of awards and nominations received by Last Week Tonight with John Oliver for example
Ref 2's title does not need the site directory; just the title of the page ("Birth of a Team & a Legend") is satisfactory
Some citations to Packers.com list the website as "Packers.com" or as "Green Bay Packers, Inc."; choose one and make them all the same for consistency

Gonzo_fan2007, all done, great work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 00:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MyCatIsAChonk I believe I have addressed all of your comments. Thanks for the review! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review and support! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Is there a standard for whether we should list 2008–Present or 2008–present in lists like these? Maybe it's because of all the player infoboxes I look at, but seeing it capitalized caught my eye.
- I have no preference *shrug* I'm fine going lowercase. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Team records accurate as of the end of Week 8 of the 2023 NFL season – Week should be lowercased, as it's not a proper name. Should also be a period at the end of the sentence.
- Sources capitalize the week. See here, here and here. Thoughts? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonzo fan2007: I understand that some sources do capitalize "week" when referring to the weeks of the NFL season, but I also recognize that the media that covers the NFL is inconsistent on this. I also feel it relevant to mention that just because some people do capitalize it, it does not necessarily make it a proper name. With that said, I'm not going to fight for it to be lowercased because I'm not sure we've actually come to a consensus on this issue at WP:NFL. It may be worth discussing at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters at some point just to get some consistency in the mix. Heck, even the season articles, such as 2023 NFL season, aren't consistent on it. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll bring it up at WT:NFL. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
References all look good, in that the formatting is consistent and the sources are appropriately reliable for the information being referenced.
Image licensing looks good
Image has appropriate alt text
- Hey man im josh, responses above. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reference and image check passed. Great job Gonzo_fan2007, even if you are a Packers fan! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – My points have all been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and support! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.