Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Padma Vibhushan award recipients/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat via FACBot (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Padma Vibhushan award recipients (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of Padma Vibhushan award recipients/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Padma Vibhushan award recipients/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): - Vivvt (Talk) 07:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because last nomination was archived, mainly because of the delays in resolving comments due to my wiki-inactivity. This time I hope to get it to its desired status. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Frankie talk |
---|
Comments by FrB.TG:
Otherwise pretty good work. Sorry I didn't leave comments in its previous nomination as I was a little bit late. Anyway, hope these help. -- Frankie talk 20:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. Per my resolved comments at its previous nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the nomination. -- Frankie talk 19:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. My two cents were incorporated in the earlier nom. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 13 needs spaces after each comma. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Done. Please let me know if you have more comments. - Vivvt (Talk) 15:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review by MPJ
So I will be looking specifically at the sources to help ensure it's meeting the FL criteria.
- The "External Links" tool shows that everything is live and well so that's good.
- I am seeing official sources, news sources ,books etc. nothing that is not a Reliable source
- Formatting is okay, dates consistent etc.
- Generally the recipients are sourced, all spot checks confirm this.
- The only statements made in the article I do not see are the "Posthumous honors" part prior to 2015 - the sources confirm they were awarded the Padma, but not posthumous? No sources on their death listed.
- The date of death sources seems to be the only issue I can find, otherwise it all looks good to me. MPJ-US 13:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In ProgressDone @MPJ-DK: Please check now. - Vivvt (Talk) 17:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]- All deaths do look sufficiently sources, reliable and well formatted. I figure it would not be hard to get the sources since the subject articles most likely had them already. Good work. From a Source standpoint I can give this my Support Y MPJ-US 19:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks much. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- All deaths do look sufficiently sources, reliable and well formatted. I figure it would not be hard to get the sources since the subject articles most likely had them already. Good work. From a Source standpoint I can give this my Support Y MPJ-US 19:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.