Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of St. Louis Rams head coaches
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Matthewedwards 00:56, 17 December 2008 [1].
Hats off to Juliancolton for doing the bulk of the work for the list's first FLC; unfortunately, it failed. I think it's good to go now. Gary King (talk) 23:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SRX
Oppose- lead/sourcing problems.
- The prose checks out fine grammatically, however, it is very messy and disorganized. Please reorganize so it may follow like the recently promoted FL of List of Tennessee Titans head coaches, or the FLC List of New Orleans Saints head coaches.
- The color in the table should only extend to the coach's name, like in the other lists mentioned above.
- I suggest moving the references for the awards to the award column because it extends the ref column and in addition it makes it confusing as to what is referencing what.
- Is databasefootball reliable? If not, replace with the football-reference.
- What source is verifying the list itself, the stats, etc. Like a general ref?--SRX 23:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- All done. Lead should be better now. I typically see the color extend through the entire row, like in List of Tennessee Titans head coaches. I've moved the references, it does indeed look better. I've replaced the references. I've never seen a general referenced used for these types of lists. Gary King (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think a general reference is necessary if everything is individually sourced. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, some of the citations need to be linked to their coaching record not their playing record, like Snyder. In addition, the lead still needs work, the first sentence of the lead should go somewhere in the last paragraph, it will be best to follow the leads of the examples I gave above.--SRX 14:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sentence moved. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead expansion? I.e. Coach who has most games played, coach who only served for the Rams. etc.--SRX 00:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- The lead already mentions which coach has coached the most games with the team. The coaches who have only served with the Rams are already mentioned in the table. Gary King (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead expansion? I.e. Coach who has most games played, coach who only served for the Rams. etc.--SRX 00:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sentence moved. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, some of the citations need to be linked to their coaching record not their playing record, like Snyder. In addition, the lead still needs work, the first sentence of the lead should go somewhere in the last paragraph, it will be best to follow the leads of the examples I gave above.--SRX 14:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think a general reference is necessary if everything is individually sourced. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Sources looks good, checked with the Checklinks tool. Cannibaloki 04:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
I think you should have asked Juliancolton before nominating, since I think its rude nominating without the main contributor. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 05:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not at all. Gary King did most of the work bringing the article up to standard. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But I think you should take hale of the credit, since you edited more than half of the page, while Gary King re-worded sentences and fixed the table. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 05:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- But I think you should take hale of the credit, since you edited more than half of the page, while Gary King re-worded sentences and fixed the table. -- SRE.K.A
- Comment from Killervogel5
- Get rid of the word "winningest"! Ew. It's in there several times.
- Done. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Julian, "winningest" doesn't mean "most wins" :) It's a percentage, so someone can still have very little wins but the highest winning percentage. Gary King (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- *facepalm* –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Julian, "winningest" doesn't mean "most wins" :) It's a percentage, so someone can still have very little wins but the highest winning percentage. Gary King (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- The table needs the playoff winning percentages.
- "The team became known as the Los Angeles Rams after they moved to Los Angeles, California in 1946." "they"-->it.
- "During World War II, the Rams suspended operation for the 1943 season because of wartime restrictions and shortages." "suspended operation" sounds like the team was a manafacturing company.
- "The club moved east to St. Louis, Missouri prior to the 1995 season." "prior to"-->before.
- The colors should only highlight the head coaches' names.
- "He served for
onlyone season before he was replaced by Hugo Bezdek." - "The current coach is Jim Haslett, and is the 25th person to serve in the position."-->Jim Haslett, the current coach, is the 25th person to serve in the position.
- "Scott Linehan, head coach of the St. Louis Rams from 2006–2008" En dash should be "to".
- Sources
- What makes http://web.archive.org/web/20071010113510/www.footballresearch.com/index.cfm reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm, well there's Professional Football Researchers Association and this. Gary King (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I am still a bit uneasy. I found this, which supports some but not all of the info that you were citing. Perhaps use the source I provided for support? Dabomb87 (talk) 13:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay I've added it. Gary King (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I am still a bit uneasy. I found this, which supports some but not all of the info that you were citing. Perhaps use the source I provided for support? Dabomb87 (talk) 13:43, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hm, well there's Professional Football Researchers Association and this. Gary King (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes http://web.archive.org/web/20071010113510/www.footballresearch.com/index.cfm reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support with the obvious conflict of interest. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24
- Comments
- I think you should merge the second paragraph with the first, since in lists, only the first article is talking about the history of the franchise.
- "There have been 21 head coaches for the Rams franchise." The table has 25.
- The third paragraph is way to small for "List of (team) head coaches" articles. Should include more stats like the playoffs and who won the most games.
- The third paragraph should cite to the general reference, but readers may not know that. Just put the general reference at the end of the paragraph.
- In the article, do you guys know which NFL Coach of the Year award did Adam Walsh won specifically?
- How did you find ref 25?
- The picture should be bigger than 350px, or just thumbed, uprighted, or righted. It says it somewhere in WP:MOS.
- Anaheim Stadium is a redirect.
- "Cleveland, Ohio" --> "Cleveland, Ohio"
- Los Angeles, California is a redirect.
- Do you really have to put Dutch Clark's name as Earl "Dutch" Clark?
- I think you should only list the Pro Football Hall of Fame inductees who were inducted as a coach. Joe Stydahar and Bob Waterfield were not elected into the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a coach.
- Why is there an external link to the St. Louis Rams official site?
- John Robinson (football coach) is a redirect.
- George Allen (NFL) is a redirect.
- When are the statistics up to?
-- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 20:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- All done. I didn't do a few as I either disagree with them or think they are incorrect. For instance, I don't think the first two paragraphs need to be merged because they discuss two fairly different topics. I don't have a general reference, so I can't add it to the third paragraph; in any case, if I did, it wouldn't be a "general" reference anymore. The NFL Coach of the Year was the "Pro NFL Coach of the Year"; there began to be more than one Coach of the Year award starting in 1947 (or later, but I know it's not before this), and the award was given in 1945 to this particular coach. Reference 25 I found through an online newspaper database search. I don't think the image needs to be any bigger; MOS says 300px is a good width to use for lead images, but in this case it's a portrait image (height is longer than width), so I think 200px is acceptable. I'm going to leave Anaheim Stadium as a redirect as that was its name at the time; redirects should not always be piped links because there is always the possibility that the redirect is built into its own article. In this particular case, for instance, the redirect could be a new article written about the time when the stadium was still called Anaheim Stadium. Locations should have the city and state separately linked, for people who want to click on one or the other; this is per MOS, I believe, and something that I strongly support. The external link is there because it is pretty relevant and can be useful. Gary King (talk) 21:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since you didn't do half of the suggestions I gave you, I'll just Weak support this nomination. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 21:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.