Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Joker (2019 film)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Joker (2019 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Sgubaldo (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is my third accolades-related FLC. I have brought the article in line with similar FLs, added missing awards, removed some non-notable ones and improved sourcing. Joker was initially somewhat controversial, but it has also received significantly more awards than the films in my other nominations.
Note: My Hacksaw Ridge nomination has received three supports, so I am adding a second one. Sgubaldo (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824
- The result column sorts weirdly with won > runner-up > nom > 23rd > 20th > 13th.
- That's all I got for now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It sorts alphabetically. Is it supposed to sort as win, runner-up, numerical places, nom and viceversa? Sgubaldo (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Jumping in to say that IMO it should sort by placement, for want of a better term, so Won, then runner-up, then "numbered" places from 3rd downwards, then un-numbered "nominated"..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Now sorts properly regardless of whether you look in ascending or descending order. Sgubaldo (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Now sorts properly regardless of whether you look in ascending or descending order. Sgubaldo (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Jumping in to say that IMO it should sort by placement, for want of a better term, so Won, then runner-up, then "numbered" places from 3rd downwards, then un-numbered "nominated"..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
editI'll do this source review, numbers taken from this revision [2] Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Refs 7, 10, 32, 41 are live, though seems to be listed as dead.
- Ref 41 is listed as ANSA and not spelt out as opposed to British Society of Cinematographers.
Only problems I see now. I'll have the spoties done soon. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- All have been returned back to life.
- Fully spelt out.
- Sgubaldo (talk) 09:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 5 Good
- Ref 10 Good
- Ref 16 Good
- Ref 19 Good
- Ref 22 Good
- Ref 28 Good
- Ref 30 Good
- Ref 35 Good
- Ref 48 Good
- Ref 57 Good
- Ref 68 Good
- Ref 70 Good
- Ref 74 Good
- Ref 97 Good
- Ref 101 Good
- Ref 105 Good
Spell out RTBF in ref 24.
What's the relability of AwardsWatch? That's all I got. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Spelt out RTBF.
- AwardsWatch is a website on the film industry and awards; it's similar to Awards Daily. It seems reliable for film awards and it's been used in FLs already. My reasoning for using it was because I wanted secondary source for all the accolades, but sometimes none of the bigger websites covered a specific one while AwardsWatch did. Sgubaldo (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as this is a nearly perfect list. Chompy Ace 21:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 19:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.