Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of colleges and universities in Iowa/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:12, 9 October 2012 [1].
List of colleges and universities in Iowa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Ruby 2010/2013 03:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it fulfills the FL criteria. This is my fifth colleges list, and I've tried to include improvements along the way as they've been suggested for each nomination. Any comments should be speedily addressed. Thanks in advance! Ruby 2010/2013 03:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support TBrandley 05:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I have no stylistic concerns, having already supported the layout when it was used for South Dakota's list; the prose looks good to me too (looked first at DYK, second review now still doesn't present anything). Keep them coming in. GRAPPLE X 00:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks to both of you for the support! Ruby 2010/2013 02:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I did a little copyedit, but I couldn't see anything worth bringing up here. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:57, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I did a very short spot-check and found that Waldorf College was sold in 2009 and became for-profit. Please check that others are up to date. Otherwise Support. Reywas92Talk 04:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm, Carnegie still lists Waldorf as a private not-for-profit institution, though the NCES has updated their information. I've adjusted the Waldorf entry accordingly. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Ruby 2010/2013 02:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NapHit (talk • contribs) |
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments good, some picks...
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.