Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:57, 13 August 2008 [1].

List of parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

edit

I ran this by The Rambling Man (talk), and edited the page in reply to his comments on the talk page. I also submitted this for Peer Review and made edits in response to those suggestions as well. Believing in good faith this is at or near the criteria necessary for a featured list, I submit this for your suggestions and hopefully approval. Best, --Allstar86 (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I saw this the other day and thought it was good. Here are a few nitpicks:
  • Support. Looks good. But one last small question. It the lead, "most recently Barbados on 14 January 2008 and Colombia on 29 January 2008, respectively." - no Malaysia (17 January 2008)? --maclean 08:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. I'm trying to say Barbados is the most recent to have signed, and Colombia most recent to have ratified. Malaysia is neither (but is the second most recent to have ratified). Perhaps the way it reads now is a bit confusing, but I'm not sure how best to improve it. --Allstar86 (talk) 20:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments
    • "encompasses the states who have signed and ratified " - however it should be worth pointing out in the lead that a number of nations have not signed/ratified the treaty because those nations are included in this list. Otherwise they should be removed from the list I guess. Or am I confused?
      • Done You're quite right that this list contains information about those not party to the treaty. I added a sentence to the first paragraph to explain that. I think this is a good title, though. --Allstar86 (talk) 07:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Second para reads a little clunky to me, four short choppy sentences... any chance of some merging and flow improvement?
      • Partially Done I've tried to edit this for flow a bit, and I think it's slightly better, but it's still not merged and I don't seem to be able to make it work any better than it is at the moment with the tweaking done to the end sentences of the paragraph. --Allstar86 (talk) 07:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • "instrument of ratification" - sounds cool, what exactly is it?
      • Basically, a document with signatures on it. I think this is common parlance in terms of every international treaty. But if you think it needs to be defined within the article, let me know. "The instrument of ratification is a document, which must be signed by an appropriate official of the respective national government, including the title of the person who has signed it and its date and place of issue. The instrument of ratification must be signed either by the Head of State, Head of Government, the Minister of Foreign Affairs or an official with full powers to sign the instrument. This signature validates the instrument of ratification."[2] --Allstar86 (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Cool, I get it but I think it's worth noting in this article. After all, we need to appeal to non-experts, so something describing what it is would be useful. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done Alright; I didn't think it was necessary but I'll happily yield to your better judgment. Edited to "the instrument of ratification serves as the document binding the state to the international treaty and can be accepted…"
    • There's been a general move away from wikilinked dates en-mass - any idea if the {{dts}} template allows for a "non-linked" version?
    • Table heading - States->states
    • I would have a look at forcing column widths in each table so you get a similar look-and-feel through each section.
    • A sub category of "treaties" is "Nuclear weapon governance" which may well be suitable here.
    • If you use it, remove the Arms control cat as that one is a supercat of the governance cat.
  • The Rambling Man (talk) 15:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support I resized the date columns so they are on one line. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - nicely done. 72.83.143.33 (talk) 19:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_parties_to_the_Comprehensive_Nuclear-Test-Ban_Treaty&oldid=231672277"