Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Emily Osment

Emily Osment

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2012 at 15:30:17 (UTC)

Original – Emily Osment performing live at KISS concert in May 2010

Reason: High resolution, sharp and free under cc-by license, already a FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Emily Osment, Emily Osment discography
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Mikey Hennessy

Support as nominator --Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as I put that in the article (then forgot about it :-/ ) Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support [[User talk:ayanosh|T]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/ayanosh|M]] (talk) 18:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)ayanosh[reply]
Support. Love the way the blurred lights offset the tight detail on the body ... the shadows of her eyelashes and the sweat and/or sparkle on her skin. Great photo of a singer in action. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry to be a negative voice, but I don't think the composition is as good as it could be, and I'm not certain that the EV is super-high; it doesn't seem to give the best impression of what she looks like, and, as far as I can tell from the article, she's more of an actress than a singer. I do normally like portraits, but I don't think this is quite up to scratch. J Milburn (talk) 13:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: We're generally much too harsh on concert photography, and I would like to see more of it promoted. The conditions are often such that some noise and softness are practically unavoidable, and having microphones and instruments a little in the way ought to be forgivable, I think. In this case, though, as a portrait, we should be able to see her eyes. Julia\^talk 20:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with Julia W, the focus appears to be on her right shoulder, not her face. A nice portrait but not well executed. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 06:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Poor composition, focus issues. Clegs (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: per J Milburn. Sanyambahga (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]