Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2021 at 18:51:18 (UTC)

Original – Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III

Reason: Good capture.
Articles in which this image appears: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Free adv. – Sca (talk) 12:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Purple lens looks so good.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 12:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Purple lens looks fakey. – Sca (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 13:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
min kameera 194.71.0.58 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose These lenses are not transparent, not purple. See [1] and [2] for instance. Nick-D (talk) 08:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nick-D, this is common for a multi-coated lens [3], [4], which most lenses are these days [5]. At ~45 degree angle one sees the reflection off of the lens coating. There are many examples on the web [6]. Here are two versions of the same lens, with and without multi-coating [7], description [8]. The tint can also be blue or green [9]. I have 3 lenses that do this, one of them reflects the same color as the nom image. Bammesk (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good quality, but a routine product photo, limited EV. --Tagooty (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to explain that one to me. We have an article on the very camera itself. We have a good-quality picture of that very camera. How on Earth is that "limited EV"? The featured picture criteria itself states that an image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. -- Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limited in that only a few photographers interested in Olympus cameras will read the article. Limited compared to more popular brands, and compared to other articles on a river or a mountain or a town. --Tagooty (talk) 03:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with above. --Janke | Talk 14:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It is what it is: a very good-quality photo of a camera. If we're going to have electronic products in and of themselves as featured pictures, I can't see why this one wouldn't qualify. -- Veggies (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Olympus E-M1 Mark III Zuiko 12-100mm.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]