Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water Buffalo

Support — Tomer T 13:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — Nice quality but not a very interesting image on the whole aside from the exoticism of the animal, which is highly relative (a picture of a Jersey Cow might be exotic to someone in Thailand, but it is ho-hum to me). Lighting is a bit washed out, the animal is just standing there, the photo is just a front-on with little else going on in it and with no real depth of field. A good illustration of a water buffalo, but not an interesting photo beyond that. --Fastfission 15:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, It's a great photo of its subject, but the framing is too tight. —Pengo 01:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. Encyclopedic, but boring and not particularly sharp. It already is a quality image on the commons, but it's not FP material. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) (The Game) 11:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, tight framing anf the posture of the animal is suboptimal. I'd rather like to see the head in profile. --Dschwen 13:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support angle isn't the best, but seems to be in an appropriate setting and detail seems to be high (took ages for the picture to load up). Terri G 16:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good detail... But not very interesting. 8thstar 00:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered background and pose leave it unclear exactly what the animal looks like. Gaius Cornelius 23:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 01:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]