Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/World Trade Center

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2013 at 18:55:59 (UTC)

Original – View of Twin Towers, c. 2000

Reason

High resolution low noise view of Twin Towers.

Articles in which this image appears

World Trade Center, One WTC

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Carol M. Highsmith

Time: 1997-2001 based on Nymex building at the riverside (finished 1997.)
Camera: probably a Mamiya medium format camera based on photo from photographer's article. Soerfm (talk) 14:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know... she seems to change her equipment a bit, and she's changed brands a bit. Her more recent stuff has been with a Phase One A/S P45+. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
...how about: high end medium format analog camera? Soerfm (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it's correct, but let's not veer into OR territory. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator --Soerfm (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
support --Երևանցի ^talk 19:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Highsmith's donation of her works into the public domain makes her one of my heroes, and this photograph is an illustration of why such efforts are important. Irreplaceable. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'd quite like to see a more precise date, but the picture is very strong and very valuable. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Highsmith doesn't seem to have recorded the date she took this... the LOC gives a much worse time frame (between 1980 and 2006 [!]) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent quality photo that we won't get the opportunity have a better one of. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great... --Godot13 (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo Anonimski (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Great picture with obvious EV, but I'd prefer that the edit were in a separate file from the original, since the alteration (particularly to hue) is noticeable. Chick Bowen 06:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some edits to the image as to color, perspective etc. but found that there was not many ways to improve it. Before the nomination I returned to the original picture with some noise reduction around the towers and along the horizon. Soerfm (talk) 12:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]