Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/R. Mika/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Withdrawn after improvement. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Per precedent when there was a physics GAR glut, it seems that this GAR was opened a bit prematurely. Since GAR nominator has agreed this was premature, this review is put on hold until May 23.
|
---|
As noted by Kung Fu Man at the article's talkpage. This article shouldn't passed on GAN since 2014, due to lack of significant coverage (not a broad in its coverage) added to the article. The article looks shoort and some important details were not added to the article. Tagging author MoonJet who worked on this article before, zero or poorly worked at the article shall be delisted. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 11:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
|
- Keep the article now looks fine unlike before, thanks to KFM for cleaning up all the mess. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 11:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.