Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Unnale Unnale/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted Consensus is that some of the sources aren't reliable. Szzuk (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Formatting problems in Cast and Soundtrack sections
- Generally not up to par with other Indian cinema GAs, with some very brief sections and not many sources
- Many sources are from websites considered unreliable in other Indian cinema GA reviews, including blogs and gossip sites
BollyJeff || talk 15:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- The GA criteria do not require the article to be "up to par" compared to other articles, because we're not grading on a curve. They also do not require any particular system of formatting. So your first two complaints are irrelevant: Articles are not delisted for these reasons.
Your last complaint could be significant. I suggest that you use{{Verify credibility}}to identify the specific sources that you believe are unacceptable so that others can consider whether these sources are being used appropriate. (No source is always unreliable.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have gone ahead and fixed some of the formatting issues that were considered unimportant by some. Now we just need to deal with sourcing issue. BollyJeff || talk 13:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Article doesn't look that bad now you've edited it. Again the main issue for me is sourcing. All dodgy sources should be replaced.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)