Talk:Unnale Unnale

Fair use rationale for Image:19unnale.jpg

Image:19unnale.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Good article nomination on hold

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of October 29, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Article is well written in clear language. Passes here. However, the third paragraph of the lead is too short. Either expand by one sentence or two, or merge somewhere in the lead.

2. Factually accurate?: Cites all look good, but I wish there were more parameters/information given in them. If you use {{Cite news}} - you should be able to fill in info on the author of the source, the date, the work, the publisher, when you last accessed it via Web, as much as you can. Please improve on this.

3. Broad in coverage?: Generally very thorough. Soundtrack could use the times of each track next to it. Try to expand, or merge small paragraphs throughout the article. (2 sentences or less usually).

4. Neutral point of view?: Article appears to indeed be written from a neutral perspective. Passes here.

5. Article stability? Some anon editing going back before one month. Not a big deal, but keep an eye on it. No major talk page conflicts. Passes here.

6. Images?: 7 images used in the article. (1) is creative commons. The rest are fair use. Detailed good fair use rationales are given on all the fair use image pages. However, I think 6 is too many. Also, some of the images' resolution is too high, please upload lower size/quality images.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. —

• Message me on my talk page after the above has been addressed, and I will give it another once over. Overall, great work, just some points above that shouldn't be too hard to quickly address. Reviewed version, 11:03, 26 October 2007 Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 15:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I helped out a bit (at User:Universal Hero's request), but i have to say the images fair use rational don't convince me, i did a google image search for "unnale unnale" and all the pictures in this article appeared in [page 1] and [page 2]. I would only leave two images, but as i am not really involved with the article i don't want to make the move. Also, it's impossible to find any information about the movie's soundtrack in the internet, you can't even buy the cd from amazon so that makes the soundtrack section un-expandable (unless you have the cd, which i don't). Yamanbaiia 18:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Failed GA

• I failed this GA candidate. My apologies, but nothing has been addressed since my GA review, and it has been over 7 days. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 06:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:19unnale.jpg

Image:19unnale.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

• I think I fixed this concern. On the image page, per policy, you had to state specifically which article the image was fair use in. And I went and did that. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 22:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC).

GA Nomination on hold

Overall the article looks pretty good. Here are a few suggestions I have:

• There are just too many decorative pictures in the article. Since all of them are used under fair-use, it's important to keep things to a minimum. Therefore, the only ones I recommend keeping are the one in the infobox and the one in the cast section. All the others should go.
• In general, I'd recommend a throgough copy edit. There's a few uneccessary comas here and there, some odd phrases, but nothing to major. I just think the language could be tightened up a bit.
• The Soundtrack section needs a bit of work. Take a look at some other film articles that include soundtrack information (Zero Patience, for instance).
• Why does it say "Life Is Beautiful" under the picture in the infobox?
• Also in the infbox, what is "crores"? If that is a currency denomination, it would be helpful to wikilink it to something.
• "The filmare was declared a hit overall, while multiplexes in cities claimed it was a blockbuster" The main thing wrong with that sentence is that it's claiming something too broad. It's only backed up by one source that says it was a hit. I'd recommend taking it out completely, as it doesn't really add much. Same thing with "It received positive feedback." in the soundtrack section. To broad, doesn't add much.
• The source provided for the DVD seems to go to a main page that doesn't give the information cited.

And that's pretty much it! I've put the articles GA nomination on hold, which means you have 7 days to address the above. Feel free to drop me a line when/if you feel the article is ready for me to look at it again. Good luck! Drewcifer (talk) 09:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

A quick observaation while I was aiming to correct the format of the 27th reference - "Topsy turvy Unnale Unnale: Big Bore. SearchIndia.com. Retrieved on November 3, 2007." It is a blacklisted hyperlink on wikipedia. The concerned editor(s) should attempt to cite another source instead. The message I get when I add "http://" to this URL is

The following link has triggered our spam protection filter: http...www.searchindia.com Either that exact link, or a portion of it (typically the root domain name) is currently blacklisted.

Thanks and regards, Mspraveen (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Looking better, but there's a few you missed:

• There's too many pictures. Since they're copyrighted, they have to be kept to a mimimum. The only ones I see worth keeping are the one in the infobox and the one in the cast section. The others should be taken off.
• Still, why does it say "Life is Beautiful" under the picture in the infobox?
• The soundtrack section is looking better, but I would still recommend changing the track listing from a table into bullet points. Take a look at The White Album for an example. 18:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I have to insist on taking Image:SadhaVinay.jpg and Image:UnnaleUnnale17.jpg out, since they're copyrighted. Illustrations are great, but if they're copyrighted they have to be kept to a minimum. That would by my last objection to the article's nomination. Drewcifer (talk) 02:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks good, Well done! I've promoted the article. Drewcifer (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

"Unnale Unnale (2007 flim)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Unnale Unnale (2007 flim) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Unnale Unnale (2007 flim) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 05:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)