Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 November 1
< October 31 | November 2 > |
---|
November 1
edit- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Looks suspiciously professional, I do not think any fan seating would offer an angle from which to take such a photograph. No information about when the photo was taken, or how the uploader (who claims to be the photographer) got to take it, uploader also has other questionable image uploads. W.marsh 14:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm a professional photographer. Did that ever cross your mind when making these accusations? --Goodfellajohnny 16:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for now, assuming good faith. However, Goodfellajohnny, please provide the information requested (date, place, etc. of photo). Of course, if this is shown to be an infringement, it will be deleted. Superm401 - Talk 21:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyright violation. Goodfellajonny is lying; the image is an Associated Press photo by Bill Kostroun. It's pretty old, so I can only find a scaled-down version of image in a sports news aggregator blog here, but the image that it links to has the exact same dimensions. -- RG2 23:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Clearly a copyvio given Goodfellajohnny's history of uploading stock images and claiming to be the photographer. Goodfellajohnny previously uploaded File:Fullj.getty-73396548me010 boston red so.jpg, a similar image of Clemens. I speedily deleted the image after I located it on Getty Images under image #76383195, by Mike Ehrmann. Rhobite 15:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I found the photo linked from mlb.com. This proves that Goodfellajohnny appropriated it as his own work. Changing to speedy delete. Rhobite 15:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I've speedily deleted this image as a copyright violation (G12). The rest of his images are on their way out anyway per the nominations below, so I don't think any of us need to waste our time finding a smoking gun to argue for speedy deletion. -- RG2 01:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Voyagerfan5761 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is not a true vector rendering, and is simply a copy of Image:System Map.png embedded as an SVG file (see image source code). Image should be deleted because it is redundant to Image:System Map.png and should be replaced with that image. –Dream out loud (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Erm, yeah, I was wondering if that image would last. I guess I'll look up more info on converting PNG to SVG. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 14:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Tuvok, what you want is bitmap tracing. See e.g. http://www.inkscape.org/doc/tracing/tutorial-tracing.html However, we don't need to vectorize every image. The main point is to encourage people to save as SVG when originally creating the image. Superm401 - Talk 21:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per User:Dream out loud. There is no advantage over the original raster. Superm401 - Talk 21:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Image:LACMTA System Map.svg is now orphaned and has been replaced by Image:LACMTA system map.png, which in turn was uploaded to Commons to replace Image:System Map.png. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 00:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Stocksbridge (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- no source, orphan, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 00:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- JW_Education (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- duplicate of article Edward Ng, possible copyvio? Calliopejen1 00:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 00:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 00:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- unclear encyclopedic value, orphan, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 00:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Lsomilleda (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- John_Maguire (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- FarroRavenKnight (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Forsakethesun (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Cameron_fahey (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, possible copyvio? Calliopejen1 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not to be obtuse, but WTF is this for? Looks like an image uploaded by the user to whom that sig belongs, for no apparent reason. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 14:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- 1Jimster07 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Commons showing through. -Nv8200p talk 14:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Beesdonthaveknees (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- hilarious, but the most unencyclopedic image ever Calliopejen1 01:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- image page used to create vanity article (user's only contribution) Calliopejen1 01:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- entertaining, but Orphaned and Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not anymore *thehehehe* ViperSnake151 14:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Giovannito (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Strangeffc (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- IAmJack600 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Adam.scott.sa@optusnet.com.au (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jamieharvey (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- JackHaywire (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic. should this go to commons? Calliopejen1 01:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Andrew_Parodi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as i can te Calliopejen1 01:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Contested. This is a picture of the former Jack Boland Rose Garden at Living Enrichment Center. A bit of a backstory. Jack Bolan was an important figure in New Thought. Mary Morrissey has claimed him as a spiritual mentor, which is why there was a Jack Bolan Rose Gardener at Morrissey's church, Living Enrichment Center. Further, he is the original minister of the Church of Today, which was later led by celebrity spiritual writer Marianne Williamson. Living Enrichment Center is now closed, and it closed in a great deal of controversy; see the articles. Therefore, this image is of historical importance. It can probably be used on the article about Living Enrichment Center, or even about Church of Today. --
- Delete. It doesn't seem like a particularly useful picture. It doesn't even show the garden in question. Superm401 - Talk 21:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It doesn't show the garden in question because Living Enrichment Center had already closed at that point and the garden was obliterated. -- Copy Editor 04:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept. -Nv8200p talk 14:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- ChristiansCatharsis (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- WordsEchoThus (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic as far as i can tell, possible Copyright violation (appears to be a publicity shot) Calliopejen1 01:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- JackJBradford (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- user's only contribution was to upload this image and turn it into a vanity article Calliopejen1 01:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (probably originally for userpage) Calliopejen1 01:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dylanagibson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Anathemation (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, likely Copyright violation (sourced to photobucket) Calliopejen1 01:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 01:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jack_Strider (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jack_Strider (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 02:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic - was originally used on Suwud page (created by same author) that was speedy deleted (A7). Snigbrook 03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned file that isn't even an image. Q T C 06:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ultimatekornfanhurt (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- orphan, obviously nonfree even though the author says otherwise (it's the logo of St. Jago High School) Calliopejen1 14:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Whatsthismornings (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- non-free derivative of copyrighted character, orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 14:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- non-free image, does not contribute significantly to readers' understanding Calliopejen1 14:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jad_cheikh (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Switchedaudio (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- obviously nonfree image (video game element), not used on any mainspace pages Calliopejen1 14:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Captainjacksparrow (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- derivative of copyrighted cartoon character, orphaned Calliopejen1 14:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 14:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned< Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- likely nonfree patch, orphaned Calliopejen1 15:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Raj_srikanth800 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Jagadishkonduru (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ingineer1981 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- orphan, likely nonfree CD cover Calliopejen1 15:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- JamesHilton07 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dontgetshot (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 15:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- does not match specified source image on fr.wiki (which is older than this one) Calliopejen1 16:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Joseph Dwayne (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- While the garden gnome will be non-free in any photo, the photo itself could be replaced by one under a free license. —Remember the dot (talk) 18:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Alicesneary (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- It isn't an actual logo, and I don't think it's a necessary fair use. The uploader did say, "I am an employee of OCLC and do have an express request and permission to add the WorldCat search box image to Wikipedia, so that more people will understand the concept of WorldCat." but no proof of this permission is given, and it probably doesn't extend to all third parties.- Superm401 - Talk 21:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. What does "non-copyrightable" mean? A sampling of Dominican Republic government sites show that all rights are reserved (for example, here). -- RG2 23:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Free image of individual at Image:Leonelfernandez20062007.jpg. -- RG2 23:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Though it's indicated that the work is licensed under cc-by-sa-2.5, it states that "Permision was given by him to the uploader for any and all non-lucrative and/or educational purpose." Clearly, the intended release by the copyright holder is much more restrictive than the license the uploader chose to display. -- RG2 23:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Tag is wrong, as this is allegedly a work of the New York state (not federal) government. Mugshots are often released to the public, but they are not automatically free. -- RG2 23:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Tag is wrong, as this is allegedly a work of the New York state (not federal) government. Mugshots are often released to the public, but they are not automatically free. -- RG2 23:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Tag is wrong, as this is allegedly a work of the New York state (not federal) government. Mugshots are often released to the public, but they are not automatically free. -- RG2 23:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Tag is wrong, as this is allegedly a work of the New York state (not federal) government. Mugshots are often released to the public, but they are not automatically free. -- RG2 23:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Source gives no indication that shot has been release into the public domain by the federal government. -- RG2 23:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. No indication credited photographer in source has released the image into the public domain. -- RG2 23:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No indication credited photographer has released work into the public domain. Deleted versions of this same image (redundant images speedily deleted) indicated Viorel Florescu worked as a Newsday photographer. It is extremely unlikely that such images are released, especially given this user's suspect upload history, especially here. -- RG2 23:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. Unsourced image; uploader not likely to hold rights to image, especially given questionable upload history and lies to cover that up. -- RG2 23:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Possible copyright violation. Uploader not likely to hold rights to image, especially given questionable upload history and lies to cover that up. -- RG2 23:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Possible copyright violation. Looks like a screencap. Uploader not likely to hold rights to image, especially given questionable upload history and lies to cover that up. -- RG2 23:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Goodfellajohnny (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Possible copyright violation. Uploader not likely to hold rights to image, especially given questionable upload history and lies to cover that up. -- RG2 23:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Alex Needham (notify | contribs). - uploaded by