Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Closed Cases 3

2006

edit

January

edit
  • The opposing side seems to have no interest in defending his edits and has resorted to making accusations against Firestorm and things like that, and hasn't given a realistic response to anything at all for three weeks. Don't waste your time with this user, please keep the page and its history as reference for his bad faith though, so that people won't waste time on it later when he inevitably proposes a mediation against me or something like that in the future. --Atari2600tim (talkcontribs) 01:26, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February

edit

March

edit
  • 2006-02-28 The Humanist papacy assigned to Chandler75 3 March 2006 (UTC). contacted parties.23:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC) Collecting comments. 21:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Have made suggestions and asked editors to work together to hammer out acceptable statements. Not sure it's going to work out. 04:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Case is closed - complainant satisfied and is taking a break from Wikipedia.02:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April

edit
  • 2006-01-04 tired light still in mediation, a very technical subject, I can use some input if anyone is able to understand physics and cosmology. thanks, SteveMc 02:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC) This case appears to have died out. I've taken a look at it (I have a background in astrophysics) and it appears the central disagreement involves including non-mainstream science in articles about scientific topics versus having them in their own pages. There doesn't appear to be much activity here and some of the disputed content has made its way into the articles in question (and points to more elaborate discussions of the disputed content). I'm going to close this case in a few days if no one disputes that. -- Joebeone (Talk) 15:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Case closed per [2]. -- Joebeone (Talk) 22:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2006-04-22 SkyTran/UniModal uncooperative admin Case still needs a mediator if one is interested, though I have recommended to those involved that they seek official, formal mediation. Cowman109Talk 22:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC) The mountain of a discussion seems to be scaring off mediators. Closing this case and recommended to those involved that they see arbitration, as this has gone through so many channels that the Mediation Cabal would have little effect, the user in question inevitably going to another source if we don't rule things in his favor. Cowman109Talk 19:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


June

edit
  • 2006-06-01 Web 2.0 referenceTotally blank, I'm assuming it's not wanted. Second opinion requested before removal. --Xyrael T 20:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Awaiting for the submitter to respond. Will close in a few days if no response is given. Cowman109Talk 21:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC) Closing. No response, if the user is not looking for the case they wanted submitted it is unlikely they will fill out the form. Cowman109Talk 14:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Seconding Closing Geo.plrd 18:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2006-06-08 neniTaken--Initial stages I'm taking this, and set up the discussion, and notified the parties. As this is my first one, I would like an experienced mediator to please randomly check over my progress, and advise me on beneficial ways I can change, or help out the discussion, that I am not doing already. Danl 01:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Closed Due to non responsiveness by one of the parties. Danl 07:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July

edit


(Note: Due to the implementation of the new bot, and uncertainty of how the bot will handle archiving, we won't be archiving cases for awhile. if you want to see a history of old cases, check out the Category:Wikipedia Medcab closed cases category.)
--The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake 00:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August

edit

September

edit

October

edit

November

edit

December

edit

Please start a new archive for 2007.